It's Apple Day - Get ready for a game changer.
I am wary of those results: it has the IP6+ resolution as 1136x640, which means a number of possibilities:
1) The benchmark app running on the IP6+ doesn't actually render at 1080p - this could artificially inflate the performance of the IP6+
2) The app *is* rendering at 1080p, but the app is misreporting the resolution - this would suggest the app hasn't been updated for the IP6+/IOS8, which could artificially lower the performance of the IP6+
As usual, benchmarking is lies, damned lies and statistics.
1) The benchmark app running on the IP6+ doesn't actually render at 1080p - this could artificially inflate the performance of the IP6+
2) The app *is* rendering at 1080p, but the app is misreporting the resolution - this would suggest the app hasn't been updated for the IP6+/IOS8, which could artificially lower the performance of the IP6+
As usual, benchmarking is lies, damned lies and statistics.
Its not misreporting, they are being rendered in 1136x640 for the iphone6+ thats why it gets a slightly better on screen score than the regular iphone6.
So yes they are probably inflated results if the app was designed for iphone6+ @ its native 1080P. There is an update out for that, not yet public.
So yes they are probably inflated results if the app was designed for iphone6+ @ its native 1080P. There is an update out for that, not yet public.
Last edited by bioforger; Oct 6, 2014 at 12:26 PM.
I rest m'case lower fps than iphone5s, no surprise really, we've seen it before when they went from non-retina to retina displays.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/...fps-benchmarks
http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/...fps-benchmarks
I am wary of those results: it has the IP6+ resolution as 1136x640, which means a number of possibilities:
1) The benchmark app running on the IP6+ doesn't actually render at 1080p - this could artificially inflate the performance of the IP6+
2) The app *is* rendering at 1080p, but the app is misreporting the resolution - this would suggest the app hasn't been updated for the IP6+/IOS8, which could artificially lower the performance of the IP6+
As usual, benchmarking is lies, damned lies and statistics.
1) The benchmark app running on the IP6+ doesn't actually render at 1080p - this could artificially inflate the performance of the IP6+
2) The app *is* rendering at 1080p, but the app is misreporting the resolution - this would suggest the app hasn't been updated for the IP6+/IOS8, which could artificially lower the performance of the IP6+
As usual, benchmarking is lies, damned lies and statistics.
Thats the slow 1.9ghz octa core version, the Adreno 420 version with 2.7ghz quad core is much faster. Look at the Galaxy S5 and add 10-12% to the performance.
iOS8 is a total piece of **** - for every good bit of hardware Apple sells us they release some crappy software to show older devices down and **** up apps that were working just fine.
For every fan boy running to the crApple store for each new gadget there are two pissed off consumers running the other way.
For every fan boy running to the crApple store for each new gadget there are two pissed off consumers running the other way.
iOS8 is a total piece of **** - for every good bit of hardware Apple sells us they release some crappy software to show older devices down and **** up apps that were working just fine.
For every fan boy running to the crApple store for each new gadget there are two pissed off consumers running the other way.
For every fan boy running to the crApple store for each new gadget there are two pissed off consumers running the other way.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
iOS8 is a total piece of **** - for every good bit of hardware Apple sells us they release some crappy software to show older devices down and **** up apps that were working just fine.
For every fan boy running to the crApple store for each new gadget there are two pissed off consumers running the other way.
For every fan boy running to the crApple store for each new gadget there are two pissed off consumers running the other way.
If we were playing Fandroid Bingo I'd have called house in your first paragraph.
Benchmarks are extremely subjective in any context. an older intel chip will outperform the new ones on a single core speed test
dependant on what the software is will depend how it responds.
that can be said for both android and apple performance benchmarks
dependant on what the software is will depend how it responds.that can be said for both android and apple performance benchmarks
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Jack you are obviously a Labour supporter, Quote figures which are comparing old to new products, then when found out, go on saying its better cos it is. The iphone is a quick phone, but not the quickest or the best with its features, especially with ios8 being riddled with bugs atm.
My daugher has the 6 model, its a nice phone, it doesn't blow you away with anything that any other phone has got already. so stop bleating about it, enjoy it when it turns up.
My daugher has the 6 model, its a nice phone, it doesn't blow you away with anything that any other phone has got already. so stop bleating about it, enjoy it when it turns up.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Same old Jack 
Lets start again.
New version of S5 has the 805 processor with the 420 GPU, "old" version of phone has the 801 processor with the 330 GPU.
New phone around 50% quicker than the old one.
Core on core performance is also what counts, even if (and this is not to say it is) slower core per core, one has 2 cores and the other has 4, that means it can use 2 cores v 1 and have more processing power at its finger tips.
Next.....

Lets start again.
New version of S5 has the 805 processor with the 420 GPU, "old" version of phone has the 801 processor with the 330 GPU.
New phone around 50% quicker than the old one.
Core on core performance is also what counts, even if (and this is not to say it is) slower core per core, one has 2 cores and the other has 4, that means it can use 2 cores v 1 and have more processing power at its finger tips.
Next.....
Same old Jack 
Lets start again.
New version of S5 has the 805 processor with the 420 GPU, "old" version of phone has the 801 processor with the 330 GPU.
New phone around 50% quicker than the old one.
Core on core performance is also what counts, even if (and this is not to say it is) slower core per core, one has 2 cores and the other has 4, that means it can use 2 cores v 1 and have more processing power at its finger tips.
Next.....

Lets start again.
New version of S5 has the 805 processor with the 420 GPU, "old" version of phone has the 801 processor with the 330 GPU.
New phone around 50% quicker than the old one.
Core on core performance is also what counts, even if (and this is not to say it is) slower core per core, one has 2 cores and the other has 4, that means it can use 2 cores v 1 and have more processing power at its finger tips.
Next.....

"Pish" because nobody really cares if FB loads a millisecond faster on one phone or the other, except a handful of geeks on a forum or two
To save me reading the whole thread, when you say "Game changer". Has apple added some new games on the iphone as i can't see much else that's changed ?
Last edited by Rob_Impreza99; Oct 8, 2014 at 10:43 AM.
Sorry Jack but I can't see how. Yeah the ipod was a game changer and it pretty much rewrote the MP3 player market, the iPhone to a certain extent opened up the smartphone market but the Watch seems to be something of nothing.
Health monitoring needs a good shake up and the watch will do it. It's really big data and only Apple will be able to kickstart it, Google can manage it too but fragmentation makes it massively more difficult.







