Notices
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes

Geometry settings, advice on measurements

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 12:16 PM
  #1  
hoskib's Avatar
hoskib
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
From: gravesend, kent
Default Geometry settings, advice on measurements

i'm getting the car set up soon and i'm after tweeking the current set up a bit, are there any 'geo setters' on here that can offer some advice.

i appreciate alot of places will keep race settings a bit of a secret, but could they advise on fast road settings please

setting started at this



felt ok, but still wasn't quite as grippy all round as i wanted. it just gave good grip, then understeer and that was it.

then went to these settings



much better, with better front end grip and the rear was very planted aswell. downside is a tendancy for the back to get away a bit quickly on tighter corners, it oversteered a bit too aggresively.

in all this set up felt maybe a bit too extreme for my (lack of) driving skill.

so, is it possible to get my car with a small amount of understeer that leads into a neutral back end that at worst gives a small bit of oversteer?

my thinking is i can't have both? more grip up front will lead to less grip at the back, so it needs more grip at the rear? but this then leads to it breaking away when it gets past it's limits? or do i just need less grip all round to limit the effect of the 'snap' when it lets go?

all very confusing, anyone got any ideas?

cheers,
Paul

Last edited by hoskib; Jul 25, 2010 at 12:19 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 02:06 PM
  #2  
Mocom Racing's Avatar
Mocom Racing
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Default

Might be worth looking at increasing your front bar rate and fitment of a rear subframe lock kit would help to keep the rear geometry consistant

Last edited by Mocom Racing; Jul 25, 2010 at 02:10 PM. Reason: Added reference to subframe lock kit
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 03:26 PM
  #3  
hoskib's Avatar
hoskib
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
From: gravesend, kent
Default

Originally Posted by Mocom Racing
Might be worth looking at increasing your front bar rate and fitment of a rear subframe lock kit would help to keep the rear geometry consistant
is that an uprated ARB and some sort of brace Zak?

i'll definately give you a call soon to get those rear shocks changed, just haven't seemed to be able to find the time to get it re-booked with you. bit embarrassing really given the time, but i will deffo be in touch
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 03:53 PM
  #4  
Mocom Racing's Avatar
Mocom Racing
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Default

A larger front ARB may suit your requirements, iirc both front and rear's on yours are OEM?
The rear subframe is allowed to float a little on it's rubber bushing to limit NVH, trouble with this is that the rear lateral arms that dictate the rear suspension's geometry are secured to this - as it moves your rear geometry changes.
The chassis already has a location to secure the position of the rear subframe and Whiteline have a couple of bolts sold as 'rear subframe lock kit' for circa £20
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 03:53 PM
  #5  
Mocom Racing's Avatar
Mocom Racing
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Default

A larger front ARB may suit your requirements, iirc both front and rear's on yours are OEM?
The rear subframe is allowed to float a little on it's rubber bushing to limit NVH, trouble with this is that the rear lateral arms that dictate the rear suspension's geometry are secured to this - as it moves your rear geometry changes.
The chassis already has a location to secure the position of the rear subframe and Whiteline have a couple of bolts sold as 'rear subframe lock kit' for circa £20
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 04:12 PM
  #6  
hoskib's Avatar
hoskib
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
From: gravesend, kent
Default

yeah it's all standard apart from the Prodrive springs. what's NVH mate?

the only thing i really don't want to do is compromise the every day ride of the car. if it makes it a really good handling car but it drives like it'll shake my fillings out that's not for me.

resonable handling and a smooth, non crashy ride and i'll be happy
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 06:36 PM
  #7  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

All wasted if the struts are coming off, you'll have to start again.

Less rear toe should calm things down, IMHO. Mine was unstable in the wet with a similarly aggressive geometry set-up.

I would also advise that an adjustable rear ARB transformed my bug-eye.

IMHO.

dunx

P.S. Noise, Vibration & Harshness...

Last edited by dunx; Jul 27, 2010 at 06:38 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 07:16 PM
  #8  
hoskib's Avatar
hoskib
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
From: gravesend, kent
Default

Originally Posted by dunx
All wasted if the struts are coming off, you'll have to start again.

Less rear toe should calm things down, IMHO. Mine was unstable in the wet with a similarly aggressive geometry set-up.

I would also advise that an adjustable rear ARB transformed my bug-eye.

IMHO.

dunx

P.S. Noise, Vibration & Harshness...
i agree 100% it's a bit daft getting the geo done twice, but there's a very noticable bit of extra wear on one of the tyres so i want that sorted as soon as possible.
the shocks can be done whenever i get the hump with them clonking

P.S. Noise, Vibration & Harshness... - what with the uprated ARB Dunx?

this is the only thing i'm hesitant about, all i want is the car to feel a bit less edgy without losing it's good grip levels.
the last thing i want is to make it a less comfortable ride than it is now, this year has been bad enough with the potholes, rutts and REO70's!
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 08:29 AM
  #9  
stockcar's Avatar
stockcar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,839
Likes: 427
From: north east
Default

you dont mention if track or road car??
certainly for road i would personally leave the Geo pretty much as is BUT with approx 1mm of toe-in total.........from the settings you currently have toe-OUT on the rear which will give you the indtability your experiencing

alyn
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 10:10 AM
  #10  
D1CCY's Avatar
D1CCY
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,966
Likes: 0
From: East Yorkshire
Default

OE suspension can be harsh (is it an STi). When I changed mine to AST struts the improvement in ride was an unexpected revelation as I thought it would be harder.
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 12:50 PM
  #11  
dunx's Avatar
dunx
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
From: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Default

Not daft, but more expense...

On the stiffest setting transverse ridges can be felt quite harshly. Adjustable allows you to be family friendly all winter and turn it up for the summer.

dunx
Reply
Old Jul 28, 2010 | 06:21 PM
  #12  
hoskib's Avatar
hoskib
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
From: gravesend, kent
Default

Originally Posted by stockcar
you dont mention if track or road car??
certainly for road i would personally leave the Geo pretty much as is BUT with approx 1mm of toe-in total.........from the settings you currently have toe-OUT on the rear which will give you the indtability your experiencing

alyn
pure road car Alyn.

so get the rear into the minus figures like the front and it'll be a bit more stable? is there much of a trade off with this option?

and what sort of degrees/minutes is about 1mm approx?

thing is though, it was less edgy with more toe out as it was before or is that the increase in front grip making the back twitchy?

steep learning curve this

cheers

Last edited by hoskib; Jul 28, 2010 at 06:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 12:21 AM
  #13  
Mocom Racing's Avatar
Mocom Racing
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
From: workshop tel: 01787 275074
Unhappy

Originally Posted by stockcar
from the settings you currently have toe-OUT on the rear which will give you the indtability your experiencing
What makes you think that, the settings illustrated on the picture above most definately provide toe-in.

I came across similar misinformation given by Dynamix recently so it'd be nice to set the record straight here; I've used a number of alignment rigs over the years and different manufacturer's make reference to what is a positive and what is a negative toe angle in different way's - perhaps this is the confusion?
Reply
Old Jul 29, 2010 | 08:26 AM
  #14  
stockcar's Avatar
stockcar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,839
Likes: 427
From: north east
Default

maybe its the way the sttings are conferred Zak but toe-in is/was always referred to as a Negative.......if your saying their wrong then that means the front is toeing out??? as the figures for front clearly state a negative figure and the rear states a positive??

the actual figures for the rear state 0.02toe either side

confused alyn.......
Reply
Old Aug 4, 2010 | 04:00 PM
  #15  
jengis's Avatar
jengis
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Can't quite believe there is confusion amongst serious enthusiasts/mechanics about toe in or out messurement!!!!

Toe-in is positive +
Toe-out is negative -

If there is confusion, then at least know that the printed setup shows toe out on the front and the slightest bit of toe in on the rear. And it is almost exactly what I have on my classic.

to the O/P - I think you have a good alignment, if you are not happy with the handling look at other areas of chassis, such as good tyres, their pressures, consider changing anti-roll bar rates. That should alow enough scope for further tweeks without you feeling like you have wasted money on more alignments.

Kev
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
taylor85
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
9
Sep 28, 2015 11:34 PM
psport
Subaru Parts
0
Sep 26, 2015 11:09 AM
Nick_Cat
Computer & Technology Related
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:00 AM
hedgecutter
General Technical
3
Sep 25, 2015 02:35 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:30 PM.