price vs amount
13 March 2007, 11:23 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Secretly saving for another Blobeye STI. Crystal Grey. Widetrack
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
price vs amount
I had my haircut the other day. i parked up outside the barbers and went in. The barber said 'nice car but how many gallons did you use up just parking the thing?'
why does everyone assume scoobs are thirsty? does anyone one here thinks so?
Ok they are not yhe most economical I admit.
Any ways i don't think they are thirsty really as I nver hear people say how many litres their cars burn only HOW MUCH MONEY it burns in petrol.
This means scoobs are fairly good on petrol its just the damnd stuff is too expensive and Gordon is a greedy git.
I wonder if Americans running up to 455 CU muscle in the late sixties thought their cars were thirsty.
I doubt it.
Apologies for a rant.
Feel better now.
why does everyone assume scoobs are thirsty? does anyone one here thinks so?
Ok they are not yhe most economical I admit.
Any ways i don't think they are thirsty really as I nver hear people say how many litres their cars burn only HOW MUCH MONEY it burns in petrol.
This means scoobs are fairly good on petrol its just the damnd stuff is too expensive and Gordon is a greedy git.
I wonder if Americans running up to 455 CU muscle in the late sixties thought their cars were thirsty.
I doubt it.Apologies for a rant.
Feel better now.
13 March 2007, 01:26 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: cardiff
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
everybody needs a hair cut!!
Trending Topics
13 March 2007, 07:03 PM
#11
I had my haircut the other day. i parked up outside the barbers and went in. The barber said 'nice car but how many gallons did you use up just parking the thing?'
why does everyone assume scoobs are thirsty? does anyone one here thinks so?
Ok they are not yhe most economical I admit.
Any ways i don't think they are thirsty really as I nver hear people say how many litres their cars burn only HOW MUCH MONEY it burns in petrol.
This means scoobs are fairly good on petrol its just the damnd stuff is too expensive and Gordon is a greedy git.
I wonder if Americans running up to 455 CU muscle in the late sixties thought their cars were thirsty. I doubt it.
Apologies for a rant.
Feel better now.
why does everyone assume scoobs are thirsty? does anyone one here thinks so?
Ok they are not yhe most economical I admit.
Any ways i don't think they are thirsty really as I nver hear people say how many litres their cars burn only HOW MUCH MONEY it burns in petrol.
This means scoobs are fairly good on petrol its just the damnd stuff is too expensive and Gordon is a greedy git.
I wonder if Americans running up to 455 CU muscle in the late sixties thought their cars were thirsty.
I doubt it.Apologies for a rant.
Feel better now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post