Notices

Lowering front subframe.

Old Jun 28, 2015 | 04:04 PM
  #1  
TECHNOPUG's Avatar
TECHNOPUG
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 114
From: Tetbury
Default Lowering front subframe.

Which bolts do I need to loosen to lower the front subframe enough to change the ARB bushes? Just the 2 at the front or at the back also?

Can I do one side at a time or do I need to loosen both the left and the right side?

Finally, is it actually supporting the weight of anything above or simply bracing everything together (before I it on my face)?
Reply
Old Jun 29, 2015 | 03:49 PM
  #2  
TECHNOPUG's Avatar
TECHNOPUG
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 114
From: Tetbury
Default

Anyone?
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2015 | 02:27 PM
  #3  
MH-Racing's Avatar
MH-Racing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Devon
Default

If its the lower c frame your talking about, just do what ive done and remove it completely. Its weighs a fair bit and just rots away anyway.
The rumour is its designed to force the engine under the car in a crash? classics don't have this c frame and I don't think there's a problem with there engines going into the cabin on a collision.

Ive kept mine in the shed just incase I fail mot for not having it.
Can actually feel the difference without it.

But to answer your question, remove the 2 front bolts (under rad support) loosen all the other bolts abit to get your clearance, if you do 1 side at a time you might twist the frame.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2015 | 08:41 AM
  #4  
bonesetter's Avatar
bonesetter
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,492
Likes: 6
From: Midlands
Default

The subframe doesn't need touching to change arb bushes
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2015 | 10:40 AM
  #5  
PhilWrx100's Avatar
PhilWrx100
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
From: Ipswich
Default

I looked at mine (blob) and found it really tight clearance between the arb bolts on lower sub frame, especially two of the bolts, plus the bolts heads are the normal soft as butter. So for me I will remove the c frame and give it a good clean and spray up while it's off.
Phil
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2015 | 01:39 PM
  #6  
TECHNOPUG's Avatar
TECHNOPUG
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 114
From: Tetbury
Default

Originally Posted by MH-Racing
If its the lower c frame your talking about, just do what ive done and remove it completely. Its weighs a fair bit and just rots away anyway.
The rumour is its designed to force the engine under the car in a crash? classics don't have this c frame and I don't think there's a problem with there engines going into the cabin on a collision.

Ive kept mine in the shed just incase I fail mot for not having it.
Can actually feel the difference without it.

But to answer your question, remove the 2 front bolts (under rad support) loosen all the other bolts abit to get your clearance, if you do 1 side at a time you might twist the frame.
That makes sense if the frame was a later addition. It's the only explanation for such a stupid design. I'll keep the subframe in place, as although it seems superfluous, I'd doubt that Subaru would go to the added expense of fitting parts for the fun of it (although it may have just been down to new legislation).

Also, I find it a good place to stick a jack when raising the car (awaits to be told that it's a really bad idea....)
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2015 | 01:44 PM
  #7  
TECHNOPUG's Avatar
TECHNOPUG
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 2,075
Likes: 114
From: Tetbury
Default

Originally Posted by bonesetter
The subframe doesn't need touching to change arb bushes
True. I managed eventually without dropping the frame.. Access is really poor though. That, plus the stupid captive bolt design....which is great until the bolt is no longer captive and the nut gets stuck at the end.....had to cut it off and replace with a normal bolt. Only really daft design I've have come across in replacing the suspension & brakes.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jul 19, 2015 | 01:25 AM
  #8  
MH-Racing's Avatar
MH-Racing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Devon
Default

Originally Posted by TECHNOPUG
That makes sense if the frame was a later addition. It's the only explanation for such a stupid design. I'll keep the subframe in place, as although it seems superfluous, I'd doubt that Subaru would go to the added expense of fitting parts for the fun of it (although it may have just been down to new legislation).

Also, I find it a good place to stick a jack when raising the car (awaits to be told that it's a really bad idea....)


It would of been just keep the eu regs happy, notice the big heavy crashbar 2001 on? Just another thing to rust lol
Alloy crashbar next on the list for me.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
Dec 22, 2015 11:59 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 AM.