what?!

92 minutes?

Jammy gits!

what?!

Why was this moved from Scotland?

Most folk in "Sports" won't be familiar with Scottish teams nicknames?

Marky-San

You should be asking why it wasnt locked instead.

Marky-San

And I think it was one of those 'grind one out' results.

As Mr O'Neil said, three points is three points.

caz1562

He really did say that

Its the points in the bag, regardless of time of winning goal.

As Mr Shankley once said "The game lasts for 90 minutes" .....well 92

moses

dont tell me the huns one

pedro72

Its a big win for rangers, no doubt about it. I remember a few years back these were the kind of results the bhoys were having to grind out, frquently at the **** end of the game. If i were a rangers fan i would be getting extremely jittery about the lack of goals. It seems only a matter of time before they drop more points. As for celtic, when they play pish they win 3-1(hope this is the case when h.l. leaves!)

Hail Hail

Pete

Zeolite

Aye well if the Celts get the twelth man help they did against the Arabs then their will be no stopping them!

hepster

It doesn't matter if you score in the 1st minute or the 92nd minute. It's the result that counts.

So get it up you

[Edited by hepster - 11/30/2003 7:16:14 PM]

my00scooby

iTrader: (1)

The tide certainly has turned, people accusing Celtic of having the twelfth man, I can remember not too long ago standing in Ibrox and we all had orange cards to wave at Hugh (hun) Dallas as he was so bias towards Rangers in the 3-1 defeat of Celtic in Parkhead.
Referees are still biased against Celtic in Scotland, end of story

Zeolite

my00scooby. What planet are you residing on? Did you not see the utd game? In my mind the Old Firm get the breaks from the refs.

Zeolite

With reference to my last post. The huns get a dodgy penalty and then the ref doesn't give a stonewall against Dodds. I think my point is proven.