Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Lightened flywheel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 09:27 AM
  #1  
John WRX's Avatar
John WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: Wirral & Scoobysmacs
Default Lightened flywheel

Been asked to post this by Frank (Redwrx) as he cant get to a pc.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of running with a lightened flywheel such as power increases and fuel consumption ??

Cheers.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #2  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

no real power increase but the revs will rise quicker thus aiding acceleration. On the downside, engine braking will be greatly reduced. Basically it helps the engine on the way up but can harm it a lot more on the way down....(as advised by Branko from BRD)
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 01:49 PM
  #3  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

We had this discussion some time ago and such was the difference in opinion (weighed in favour of ) that I brought a lightweight flywheel (4.5kg) only to sell it without it even making it onto the car. I then thought 'what the hell' and brought another ultralight flywheel (4.2kgs) and had it fitted to my car (along with many other bits).

The negatives that came up on the thread were:

*Makes the car idle badly
*Makes the car too hard to launch
*Doesnt make a difference to performance
*Engine braking etc etc

My experiences:

*Intially makes the car feel lighter and more free revving
*Idle - unchanged
*Performance? Not one for bhp (number) chasers, but makes a positive difference on the road.
*No problem with launching. Yes it takes more skill to stop bogging but I had no probs achieving consistant 1.7s 60ft at the drag strip.

I will most definatley be sticking with lightweight flywheels
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 01:52 PM
  #4  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

agree with BOB there, it depends what the cars going to be used for as well.

I think when the time comes i will get a lighter one, but only slightly....maybe the 8.6kg variety that seems to go round....horses for courses and all that...
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #5  
John WRX's Avatar
John WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: Wirral & Scoobysmacs
Default

What about fuel consumption? thats his main issue.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 04:22 PM
  #6  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Havent noticed any difference in fuel consumption and cant see any reason why it should be effected?
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #7  
stu_5's Avatar
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Neilo
no real power increase but the revs will rise quicker thus aiding acceleration. On the downside, engine braking will be greatly reduced. Basically it helps the engine on the way up but can harm it a lot more on the way down....(as advised by Branko from BRD)
This has been discussed before.

Suprisingly engine braking should increase.

Friction losses within the engine are the same, but the momentum to keep it running at the same speed when you lift off has been reduced so the revs will fall faster- the same way they rise.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #8  
stu_5's Avatar
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Default

If anything fuel consumption would also fall- engine has to do less work. Wouldnt expect to notice it on anything other than a test bed however!
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #9  
Neilo's Avatar
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Default

either way i was told it wasnt so good for the engine on the way back down.....??
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 07:22 PM
  #10  
stu_5's Avatar
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Default

to be honest I'd be more concerned for it on the way up under load. The issue is the engines designed with the flywheel to act to help counter imbalances present within it. Never seen any problems on mine, but thats only with an oem item machined down by API. - Something similar to thats probably the best way to go on a cost/return basis.

If your really bothered however and are going for something very light at around 4.5kg- change the pulley counterweights at the front as well for lightened items to help bring it back in balance.
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2005 | 11:12 PM
  #11  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

David has mentioned before what you say stu_5

Mines running a dream so not going to bother messing around with it.

Bob
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2005 | 10:52 PM
  #12  
theotherphil's Avatar
theotherphil
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 1
Default

Same experience as Bob. I am also running a 4.2kg fw (Fidanza) with no problems. The difference in "pull" through the gears is like night and day - really noticable!
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 10:39 AM
  #13  
John WRX's Avatar
John WRX
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: Wirral & Scoobysmacs
Default

up for Frank for when he gets home from holiday/work
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #14  
timmyajmy93wrx's Avatar
timmyajmy93wrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,597
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire
Default

well i hope it is good news for light weight flywheels i just bought an exedy 4.5kgs flywheel and a nice ACT organic clutch (420lbs capable). I already
have the GO Fast Bits lightweight pulleys at the front 'to balance it out'

have to see what a difference it makes when i get it done - sounds promising, then i will be off for a trip to see havey for a fmic!

tim
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 06:13 PM
  #15  
murfs's Avatar
murfs
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
From: Cork, Ireland
Default

Originally Posted by timmyajmy93wrx
well i hope it is good news for light weight flywheels i just bought an exedy 4.5kgs flywheel and a nice ACT organic clutch (420lbs capable). I already
have the GO Fast Bits lightweight pulleys at the front 'to balance it out'

have to see what a difference it makes when i get it done - sounds promising, then i will be off for a trip to see havey for a fmic!

tim
I'm thinking of doing the same, lets us know when it's all done and how you get on with it. I'm more interested in a quick start than big HP, and that should help.

Best of luck
Murfs
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 06:17 PM
  #16  
StickyMicky's Avatar
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
From: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Default

i run a 7.5kg as performance item

i thought i noticed a marginal increase in MPG, but i cant be sure

it did make "heel and toe" much much easier tho
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 08:34 PM
  #17  
98prodrivewrs's Avatar
98prodrivewrs
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Question

Is it benificial to the engine meaning less stress on it
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #18  
redwrx's Avatar
redwrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire
Default

Thanks for the info guys, and thanks John for posting this for me..

Frank
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #19  
vulnax999's Avatar
vulnax999
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 4,362
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by John WRX
What about fuel consumption? thats his main issue.
Then buy a Diesel!!!

Mine is a lightened OEM one at 8kg ( By ASPerformance approx £100 exchange ) and is fine - no downsides and engine spins up a bit quicker, as less mass to get moving ( and to slow down too! ).
It's smooth and not jerky on pulling away, launches fine without bogging.

Very lightweight flywheels circa 4kg may have more issues?

As less metal to spin round, very slight fuel economy could be expected but offset by the better go!


I also got light front pulleys but not essential as the engine is not especially balanced front to back ( only rotationally ), so changing one end for lighter items won't cause any problems. Saved 3kg on front pullies but expensive way to do it!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #20  
redwrx's Avatar
redwrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,381
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire
Default

Hopefully getting the car done this weekend,

the flywheel is 25% lightened.

As for economy, i still need to get some kinda sense from it...... for work based 'expenses' trips.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
Sep 28, 2015 01:06 PM
alex_00s
Drivetrain
2
Sep 26, 2015 06:07 PM
speedrick
Subaru Parts
0
Sep 26, 2015 03:01 PM
MightyArsenal
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
6
Sep 25, 2015 08:31 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:19 AM.