impreza vs evo
31 January 2012, 03:58 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Lymington, newforest
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
impreza vs evo
which is faster,
impreza or evo,
there's only one way to find out,
fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63fc6o9COTU
impreza or evo,
there's only one way to find out,
fiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=63fc6o9COTU
31 January 2012, 04:30 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Worcestershire
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for that trippie.
was thata fair fight???? were they similar spec ????
I always thought the mitz had a bhp advantage??? albeit trick computer expensive bits.
the scooby showd it ITS TAIL , and sucked it up in your video. n i c e..
Glad i got mine now.
LoL
ps . chopperman , they used to do this on birmingham ringroad in the early hours....
was thata fair fight???? were they similar spec ????
I always thought the mitz had a bhp advantage??? albeit trick computer expensive bits.
the scooby showd it ITS TAIL , and sucked it up in your video. n i c e..
Glad i got mine now.
LoL
ps . chopperman , they used to do this on birmingham ringroad in the early hours....
31 January 2012, 04:47 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for that trippie.
was thata fair fight???? were they similar spec ????
I always thought the mitz had a bhp advantage??? albeit trick computer expensive bits.
the scooby showd it ITS TAIL , and sucked it up in your video. n i c e..
Glad i got mine now.
LoL
ps . chopperman , they used to do this on birmingham ringroad in the early hours....
was thata fair fight???? were they similar spec ????
I always thought the mitz had a bhp advantage??? albeit trick computer expensive bits.
the scooby showd it ITS TAIL , and sucked it up in your video. n i c e..
Glad i got mine now.
LoL
ps . chopperman , they used to do this on birmingham ringroad in the early hours....
Last edited by chopperman; 31 January 2012 at 05:54 PM.
Trending Topics
31 January 2012, 09:15 PM
#11
31 January 2012, 11:25 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Tony
31 January 2012, 11:28 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yeah i always thought evos were a bit quicker as they had more power out the box excluding RB320 and cs400 with their fq 320,360 and 400 but the scoobs were a better daily driver and just as quick in the real world.
01 February 2012, 08:18 AM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01 February 2012, 08:37 AM
#20
Here's my old on I had for 5 years.
Still miss it sometimes.this type R is a little quicker in a straight line,and keeps you on you're toes a bit more.
The Evo did handle a bit better than the scoob.It was an Evo 3 so didn't have AYC.I don't like driving aids.
It never let me down once.
My favourite is................,ok I still can't decide.Love em both.
Danny.
Still miss it sometimes.this type R is a little quicker in a straight line,and keeps you on you're toes a bit more.
The Evo did handle a bit better than the scoob.It was an Evo 3 so didn't have AYC.I don't like driving aids.
It never let me down once.
My favourite is................,ok I still can't decide.Love em both.
Danny.
01 February 2012, 11:03 AM
#22
@ tony
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review...a/saloon-2000/
ref 03 sti
and
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review.../evo-vii-2002/
03 evo
0.2 of a sec quicker to 60 and 5mph higher top speed goes to the evo . this is just the first example i came across with googles help , so would stand by my original statment . evo's may be marginally quicker but a scoob will handle better and possibly do a quicker lap (track dependant). confirm's what i originally thought .
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review...a/saloon-2000/
ref 03 sti
and
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review.../evo-vii-2002/
03 evo
0.2 of a sec quicker to 60 and 5mph higher top speed goes to the evo . this is just the first example i came across with googles help , so would stand by my original statment . evo's may be marginally quicker but a scoob will handle better and possibly do a quicker lap (track dependant). confirm's what i originally thought .
01 February 2012, 11:07 AM
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chester, NW
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not a lot in it in the real world.
Had 2 Evo's (VIII & IX). Beat some scoobs, lost to some scoobs. Always respected both makes.
Now looking for a V4/V5 typeR or Sti bug to make the switch.
Had 2 Evo's (VIII & IX). Beat some scoobs, lost to some scoobs. Always respected both makes.
Now looking for a V4/V5 typeR or Sti bug to make the switch.
01 February 2012, 11:21 AM
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
@ tony
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review...a/saloon-2000/
ref 03 sti
and
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review.../evo-vii-2002/
03 evo
0.2 of a sec quicker to 60 and 5mph higher top speed goes to the evo . this is just the first example i came across with googles help , so would stand by my original statment . evo's may be marginally quicker but a scoob will handle better and possibly do a quicker lap (track dependant). confirm's what i originally thought .
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review...a/saloon-2000/
ref 03 sti
and
http://www.parkers.co.uk/cars/review.../evo-vii-2002/
03 evo
0.2 of a sec quicker to 60 and 5mph higher top speed goes to the evo . this is just the first example i came across with googles help , so would stand by my original statment . evo's may be marginally quicker but a scoob will handle better and possibly do a quicker lap (track dependant). confirm's what i originally thought .
you have quoted a JDM evo against a UK spec sti.Now if you go for my MY03, 4.3 to 60, 276 (quoted) bhp, 290lbs of torque (factory figures of 280ps/290lbs) it sort of moves the goal posts a little
You could if you wished, quote the evo 260 v the my05 uk sti, much better comparison as anything else is actually a JDM model when it comes to evo's in the uk
Tony
01 February 2012, 11:43 AM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chester, NW
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
@ Tony.....
.....You can't use Evo 260 figures as everyone knows their not a real Evo!! Plus they have a ****ty 1st gear rev limit.
And the manufacturers claims are always exaggerated.
0-60 times for a VIII MR RS (jdm) and VIII FQ300 (ukdm) are oft found quoted as the same but the RS has less weight, RS short ratio box, etc etc......
.....You can't use Evo 260 figures as everyone knows their not a real Evo!! Plus they have a ****ty 1st gear rev limit.
And the manufacturers claims are always exaggerated.
0-60 times for a VIII MR RS (jdm) and VIII FQ300 (ukdm) are oft found quoted as the same but the RS has less weight, RS short ratio box, etc etc......
01 February 2012, 12:15 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
@ Tony.....
.....You can't use Evo 260 figures as everyone knows their not a real Evo!! Plus they have a ****ty 1st gear rev limit.
And the manufacturers claims are always exaggerated.
0-60 times for a VIII MR RS (jdm) and VIII FQ300 (ukdm) are oft found quoted as the same but the RS has less weight, RS short ratio box, etc etc......
.....You can't use Evo 260 figures as everyone knows their not a real Evo!! Plus they have a ****ty 1st gear rev limit.
And the manufacturers claims are always exaggerated.
0-60 times for a VIII MR RS (jdm) and VIII FQ300 (ukdm) are oft found quoted as the same but the RS has less weight, RS short ratio box, etc etc......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dGlrdpa4p70
Tony
01 February 2012, 12:27 PM
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Chester, NW
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
