bug bhp
29 November 2010, 11:09 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bug bhp
in your OPINION , what power should i be gettin from a 02 jdm prodrive bug , with decat downpipe , 3' all the way back, walbro fuel pump, apexi induction , and ecutek'ed to 1.5 bar ???
29 November 2010, 03:46 PM
#4
mine 2001 JDM STI is running 344.5bhp.. list of mods is similar, apexi induction, sports cat on the uprated zort, walbro fuel pump, FMIC & full remap on a stock Turbo seeing it hit 1.5bar max on the defi's at ScoobyClinic
They did say thats high figures on a stock turbo & usually with similar mods hit between 320-335bhp. Get it on the rollers m8 best way to find out if car is healthy or not
They did say thats high figures on a stock turbo & usually with similar mods hit between 320-335bhp. Get it on the rollers m8 best way to find out if car is healthy or not
30 November 2010, 10:06 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
bob map , dyno dynamics rollin road , and results were 302/310. dissapointed
i seem to be missing about thirty ponies , has anyone seen them ????
and yesh she be's a sti , prodrive style !
i seem to be missing about thirty ponies , has anyone seen them ????
and yesh she be's a sti , prodrive style !
Trending Topics
30 November 2010, 10:14 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: leicester
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
had the same issue myself with figures on the same car but uk , going to try a different rollers in jan if no joy back to the mapper
was bob mapping it at hte time , if so what did he say ?
was bob mapping it at hte time , if so what did he say ?
30 November 2010, 11:52 AM
#11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stoke On Where?
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have a 2003 JDM, so assuming this is the same on both years of car with the gearbox etc, There is a switch on top of the gearbox that tells the ecu when it`s in neutrol, unfortunatley made of plastic and prone to wearing out.
I`ve seen it twice on mine now. in only 3 years. The car runs prefectley smoothly when its not working and will make quite good power, but is usually about 40bhp down on where it should be. If i remeber rightly it thinks its in neutrol and stops the avcs heads from kicking in. Paul at Zen diagnosed it on mine when it first went for mapping.
I`ve seen it twice on mine now. in only 3 years. The car runs prefectley smoothly when its not working and will make quite good power, but is usually about 40bhp down on where it should be. If i remeber rightly it thinks its in neutrol and stops the avcs heads from kicking in. Paul at Zen diagnosed it on mine when it first went for mapping.
30 November 2010, 12:30 PM
#13
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Slowly rebuilding the kit of bits into a car...
Posts: 14,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Obvious fault to spot whilst mapping, your car will feel very smooth from tickover to limiter, BUT there will be no "kick" when the AVCS should be engaged due to a faulty NPS.
HTH
dunx
P.S. Diagnosed on mine whilst mapping too !
HTH
dunx
P.S. Diagnosed on mine whilst mapping too !
30 November 2010, 02:34 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stoke On Where?
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine was mapped on the road, most are, Paul just tweeks on the rollers when done. Can`t hurt to post a graph copy, might be quite hard to tell from this though. I`ll find mine (similar spec) to compare. Could have gone post mapping easy enough in that gap, so as to be not spotted when the mapping was done.
30 November 2010, 04:37 PM
#17
Had my bug sti done just over a week ago and Duncan from racedynamix picked up that my neutral position switch was faulty, still managed to do the map. Will be of to Zen sometime early next year for the rollers
just waiting to get my new one fitted and should be happy days
30 November 2010, 07:51 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bath
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
01 December 2010, 10:55 AM
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Stoke On Where?
Posts: 764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine have come from subaru / Roger Clark, think they were about £45, easy part to change but in an awkward position, right on the top of the gearbox.
01 December 2010, 06:23 PM
#23
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (30)
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: leicester
Posts: 3,508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
no graph but just found out that if it was the nps then my car would be running rich and when it was on the rollers the operator said fueling was fine
back to the drawing board to find my missing ponys ...lol
dynamix - may need to speak at some point
back to the drawing board to find my missing ponys ...lol
dynamix - may need to speak at some point
02 December 2010, 10:34 AM
#25
Not sure if this is a silly question but the car whilst on the on the rollers was with high ron fuel? right? Mine was done with shells V-power. I always use that & nothing else.. if it was done with a lower grade of fuel this could be the same amount of missing ponies
02 December 2010, 11:26 PM
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portadown
Posts: 1,003
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
the mapping guys would be able to tell if the switch is faffin about, quick fix is thinner copper washer, new switch about 40 to 50 quid off subaru, all new age have them