Is this a real RA?
#1
Is this a real RA?
Hello, joined up because am looking to buy a Subaru and thought this forum would be a good place to get advice, am looking at buying this Impreza but got a few questions about it is it a real RA? and why is the engine stronger?
Thanks for any help
Thanks for any help
Last edited by Vader9; 08 July 2010 at 09:13 AM. Reason: removed link :-p
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Welcome
It could be a WRX RA but you would need to check the chassis code to be 100% sure, then the rest is total bs with the exception of the close ratio gearbox, the engine is no stronger than any other car of its year, its the same block, same internals etc, no difference, and the power is no where near 280bhp (no subaru had 280bhp out of the factory, 280ps but those were version 3 STI's onwards), the power output of this car is 237bhp or 240ps on 97 ron fuel (if they have ever used 95 ron fuel, walk away, could hold some nasty surprises caused by prolonged det )
Tony
It could be a WRX RA but you would need to check the chassis code to be 100% sure, then the rest is total bs with the exception of the close ratio gearbox, the engine is no stronger than any other car of its year, its the same block, same internals etc, no difference, and the power is no where near 280bhp (no subaru had 280bhp out of the factory, 280ps but those were version 3 STI's onwards), the power output of this car is 237bhp or 240ps on 97 ron fuel (if they have ever used 95 ron fuel, walk away, could hold some nasty surprises caused by prolonged det )
Tony
Last edited by TonyBurns; 06 July 2010 at 04:28 PM.
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Here are the applied model codes, god that guy is coming out with some bs lol
http://www.scoobypedia.co.uk/index.p...ProductionRuns
Only the STI's had a 5th injector (its not used btw, not even attached), ic water spray (though it can be retro fitted but you get auto and manual on a "real STI RA" nothing on a wrx).
Tony
http://www.scoobypedia.co.uk/index.p...ProductionRuns
Only the STI's had a 5th injector (its not used btw, not even attached), ic water spray (though it can be retro fitted but you get auto and manual on a "real STI RA" nothing on a wrx).
Tony
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Tony
Trending Topics
#9
Welcome
It could be a WRX RA but you would need to check the chassis code to be 100% sure, then the rest is total bs with the exception of the close ratio gearbox, the engine is no stronger than any other car of its year, its the same block, same internals etc, no difference, and the power is no where near 280bhp (no subaru had 280bhp out of the factory, 280ps but those were version 3 STI's onwards), the power output of this car is 237bhp or 240ps on 97 ron fuel (if they have ever used 95 ron fuel, walk away, could hold some nasty surprises caused by prolonged det )
Tony
It could be a WRX RA but you would need to check the chassis code to be 100% sure, then the rest is total bs with the exception of the close ratio gearbox, the engine is no stronger than any other car of its year, its the same block, same internals etc, no difference, and the power is no where near 280bhp (no subaru had 280bhp out of the factory, 280ps but those were version 3 STI's onwards), the power output of this car is 237bhp or 240ps on 97 ron fuel (if they have ever used 95 ron fuel, walk away, could hold some nasty surprises caused by prolonged det )
Tony
Last edited by Vader9; 06 July 2010 at 05:40 PM.
#10
#11
Scooby Regular
IMO it looks a bit manky considering the price. You can get good to full history MY99/00 UK cars for that money. If your determined to go for an import then an import around 98 would be a good idea if you intend to mod it - its kind of the one know one wants but for no real reason why not.
#12
IMO it looks a bit manky considering the price. You can get good to full history MY99/00 UK cars for that money. If your determined to go for an import then an import around 98 would be a good idea if you intend to mod it - its kind of the one know one wants but for no real reason why not.
Manky? it will be like new after a full respray surly can i get a 98 RA for £2500 and do they have a closed deck block too?
#16
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Tony
#19
The ra is a very light and nimble car if you wanted a point to point car, short straights and tight bends then it is perfect 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th are very close and you can be very quick through the box 0 to 85 is very quick and you would always be in boost coming out of the bends , 5th is longer but still low compared to other impreza's .sti ra you would benefit from a dccd center diff and a bit longer gears so better for main roads and motorways , if you want a car or long distance then a uk spec car would be better .
Good luck with your choice , Shonner.
Good luck with your choice , Shonner.
#20
The ra is a very light and nimble car if you wanted a point to point car, short straights and tight bends then it is perfect 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th are very close and you can be very quick through the box 0 to 85 is very quick and you would always be in boost coming out of the bends , 5th is longer but still low compared to other impreza's .sti ra you would benefit from a dccd center diff and a bit longer gears so better for main roads and motorways , if you want a car or long distance then a uk spec car would be better .
Good luck with your choice , Shonner.
Good luck with your choice , Shonner.
Hopefully i will be a fellow scooby owner tomorrow afternoon like you fine boys and girls
Last edited by Vader9; 06 July 2010 at 08:19 PM.
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
some model codes
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 first STi Modified from production WRX
94-96 Sti RA V3 GC8C4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-96 WRX V3 RA V1 GC8C47D 260
BTW there were two years of "C" year code one being C1 94-95 & C2 95-96 but cant tell by the plate
IIRC
Tony
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 first STi Modified from production WRX
94-96 Sti RA V3 GC8C4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-96 WRX V3 RA V1 GC8C47D 260
BTW there were two years of "C" year code one being C1 94-95 & C2 95-96 but cant tell by the plate
IIRC
Tony
Last edited by T5NYW; 06 July 2010 at 08:49 PM.
#22
some model codes
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 4 door Modified from production WRX
94-95 Sti RA GC8C47D 275 4 door Modified from production WRX
95-96 Sti RA V3 GC8D4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-95 WRX V3 RA V1 GC8C47D 260
Tony
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 4 door Modified from production WRX
94-95 Sti RA GC8C47D 275 4 door Modified from production WRX
95-96 Sti RA V3 GC8D4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-95 WRX V3 RA V1 GC8C47D 260
Tony
#23
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes
on
19 Posts
I have edited it as was not correct due C year code C1 & C2 year quirk such an ****
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 first STi Modified from production WRX
94-96 Sti RA V3 GC8C4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-96 WRX V3 RA GC8C47D 260
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 first STi Modified from production WRX
94-96 Sti RA V3 GC8C4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-96 WRX V3 RA GC8C47D 260
#24
#25
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Where is Simon when you need him?
It's MY93, which I'm certain doesn't have 280bhp, so its output is incorrectly advertised for starters. I'm pretty sure its 240ps.
This is backed by the fact my old MY97 UK (standard, but as per most UK spec cars, it rollers around 240bhp on 95RON) can keep up with one in a straight line drag as recently proven a few months back, despite the shorter gearing. So it most certainly does not leave other Imprezas in the dust (in standard trim, at least).
It's MY93, which I'm certain doesn't have 280bhp, so its output is incorrectly advertised for starters. I'm pretty sure its 240ps.
This is backed by the fact my old MY97 UK (standard, but as per most UK spec cars, it rollers around 240bhp on 95RON) can keep up with one in a straight line drag as recently proven a few months back, despite the shorter gearing. So it most certainly does not leave other Imprezas in the dust (in standard trim, at least).
Last edited by ALi-B; 06 July 2010 at 09:32 PM.
#26
I have edited it as was not correct due C year code C1 & C2 year quirk such an ****
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 first STi Modified from production WRX
94-96 Sti RA V3 GC8C4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-96 WRX V3 RA GC8C47D 260
93-94 Sti RA GC8B47D 250 first STi Modified from production WRX
94-96 Sti RA V3 GC8C4DD 275 First full production STi RA
92-93 WRX V1 RA GC8A47D 240 4 door
93-94 WRX V2 RA GC8B47D 260 4 door
94-96 WRX V3 RA GC8C47D 260
www.type-ra.co.uk .....
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (18)
Seeing as we'r on the subject, the one below looks like a Ver5 1999 Type R Vltd not a WRC Ltd (Ver 6 /MY 2000) as stated in advert:
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1838495.htm
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/1838495.htm
#28
Where is Simon when you need him?
It's MY93, which I'm certain doesn't have 280bhp, so its output is incorrectly advertised for starters. I'm pretty sure its 240ps.
This is backed by the fact my old MY97 UK (standard, but as per most UK spec cars, it rollers around 240bhp on 95RON) can keep up with one in a straight line drag as recently proven a few months back, despite the shorter gearing. So it most certainly does not leave other Imprezas in the dust (in standard trim, at least).
It's MY93, which I'm certain doesn't have 280bhp, so its output is incorrectly advertised for starters. I'm pretty sure its 240ps.
This is backed by the fact my old MY97 UK (standard, but as per most UK spec cars, it rollers around 240bhp on 95RON) can keep up with one in a straight line drag as recently proven a few months back, despite the shorter gearing. So it most certainly does not leave other Imprezas in the dust (in standard trim, at least).
Last edited by Vader9; 06 July 2010 at 09:41 PM.
#29
I've not read the advert but the car may of been modified slightly & remapped, but I think 280bhp is unlikely though from a 93 car.
If you do a lot of motorway miles i'd give it a miss as the short ratio's are quite harsh on the earlier RA's. Probably about 4000-4500rpm at 70 on the motorway. But if you only want it for short sprints then a RA would be a good choice
Good-Luck if you decide to buy it
If you do a lot of motorway miles i'd give it a miss as the short ratio's are quite harsh on the earlier RA's. Probably about 4000-4500rpm at 70 on the motorway. But if you only want it for short sprints then a RA would be a good choice
Good-Luck if you decide to buy it
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The yorkshire dales - best roads in the UK
Posts: 3,311
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Should be approx 240 if it's a 93. 280 is easy with a chipped ecu, filter, exhaust etc. Seems a bit pricy for a 93, I paid £2300 for mine 5 years ago, totally standard and untouched. Keep your options open there are pleny of nice cars to choose from around that price.