Turbo 2000 vs Type R
Hello there,
I'm quite intrigued by the type-r, almost to the point of selling the turbo 2000 and buying a type-r. At the moment I have a completely standard turbo 2000.
I'm wondering if there is a huge difference in the way it handles and accelerates? I've tried looking for specs for both cars to compare side-to-side, but I keep finding such varying statistics for the same cars.
From what I understand, my 99 turbo has either 215 or 218bhp? and weighs 1220kg? and a v5 type-r 280bhp? weighing 1100kg?
does anyone have any accurate performance figures?
I think just by looking at the power to weight figures, surely the type-r must feel MUCH quicker than the turbo 2000 or is this not the case?
Any replies would be greatly appreciated!
I'm quite intrigued by the type-r, almost to the point of selling the turbo 2000 and buying a type-r. At the moment I have a completely standard turbo 2000.
I'm wondering if there is a huge difference in the way it handles and accelerates? I've tried looking for specs for both cars to compare side-to-side, but I keep finding such varying statistics for the same cars.
From what I understand, my 99 turbo has either 215 or 218bhp? and weighs 1220kg? and a v5 type-r 280bhp? weighing 1100kg?
does anyone have any accurate performance figures?
I think just by looking at the power to weight figures, surely the type-r must feel MUCH quicker than the turbo 2000 or is this not the case?
Any replies would be greatly appreciated!
Acceleration on the JDM car is sharper both due to the increased power output and the revvier engine, but most importantly by the much lower gear ratios. This improves acceleration but the downside, if you spend a lot of time on the motorway, is that fifth on a Type R gearbox is more or less the same ratio as fourth on a UK one.
From what I understand, my 99 turbo has either 215 or 218bhp? and weighs 1220kg? and a v5 type-r 280bhp? weighing 1100kg?
Any replies would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks very much for the replies, very informative!
I'd had a good search beforehand, but couldn't find much about the step up from a standard turbo to say an sti/type-r/p1 etc. but I've read a lot of the posts about type r's. I'm becoming more tempted as the days go on!
I'd had a good search beforehand, but couldn't find much about the step up from a standard turbo to say an sti/type-r/p1 etc. but I've read a lot of the posts about type r's. I'm becoming more tempted as the days go on!
Last edited by m444rk; Feb 28, 2010 at 01:06 AM.
Apart from the acceleration the main thing I noticed was the way it felt round the bends, the type r just seems to dig its heels in and hang on much better than a uk car.
The whole package just feels sharper and more agile though, the gearing can be annoying when you've been used to a UK car. Acceleration is a lot keener when you change up a gear as the ratios are closer and shorter, the gearstick throw is also physically shorter.
The whole package just feels sharper and more agile though, the gearing can be annoying when you've been used to a UK car. Acceleration is a lot keener when you change up a gear as the ratios are closer and shorter, the gearstick throw is also physically shorter.
Thanks very much for the info! Acceleration is the thing i love the most, so any improvement from the standard would be great! I'm looking to spend around £6.5-7k on one, and from what i've seen i can probably get a nice example for this amount!
Trending Topics
I was told it was a option on the v-ltd with the longer 5th..
With regards to the P1 vs Type r debarte their are pros and cons for both, type r is more of a track car/drivers car than a P1..
Get a type-r mate you will never look back!
With regards to the P1 vs Type r debarte their are pros and cons for both, type r is more of a track car/drivers car than a P1..
Get a type-r mate you will never look back!
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Yes believe the longer 5th was an option from the factory
personally the turbo 2000 and type R are just totally different machines, the type R is a more manic monster where as the turbo 2000 is a more sedate everyday car, the turbo 2000 is probably slightly lighter though due to not having air con as standard but the dccd and shorter ratio's make up for this in the type r (and the extra 61bhp helps too
)
Tony
personally the turbo 2000 and type R are just totally different machines, the type R is a more manic monster where as the turbo 2000 is a more sedate everyday car, the turbo 2000 is probably slightly lighter though due to not having air con as standard but the dccd and shorter ratio's make up for this in the type r (and the extra 61bhp helps too
)Tony
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jobegold@hotmail.co.uk
ScoobyNet General
2
Sep 27, 2015 09:44 PM






80mph was 4000rpm. Wasnt it the last off the line v6's that had a longer 5th?
Wheres Tonyburns when you need him



