Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Turbo 2000 vs Type R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27 February 2010, 06:04 PM
  #1  
m444rk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
m444rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo 2000 vs Type R

Hello there,

I'm quite intrigued by the type-r, almost to the point of selling the turbo 2000 and buying a type-r. At the moment I have a completely standard turbo 2000.

I'm wondering if there is a huge difference in the way it handles and accelerates? I've tried looking for specs for both cars to compare side-to-side, but I keep finding such varying statistics for the same cars.

From what I understand, my 99 turbo has either 215 or 218bhp? and weighs 1220kg? and a v5 type-r 280bhp? weighing 1100kg?

does anyone have any accurate performance figures?

I think just by looking at the power to weight figures, surely the type-r must feel MUCH quicker than the turbo 2000 or is this not the case?

Any replies would be greatly appreciated!
Old 27 February 2010, 06:08 PM
  #2  
bluenose172
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
bluenose172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Type R will feel quicker and will handle better, that's for sure. The V5 Type R will be at least 1250-1270KG though.
Old 27 February 2010, 06:15 PM
  #3  
Splitpin
Scooby Regular
 
Splitpin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m444rk
I'm wondering if there is a huge difference in the way it handles and accelerates?
The standard version 5 Type R suspension is a little lower and a fair bit stiffer than the UK counterpart. The main handling differences result from mechanical changes - the plated rear and driver controlled centre diff on the Type R. This makes for much livelier handling under power.

Acceleration on the JDM car is sharper both due to the increased power output and the revvier engine, but most importantly by the much lower gear ratios. This improves acceleration but the downside, if you spend a lot of time on the motorway, is that fifth on a Type R gearbox is more or less the same ratio as fourth on a UK one.

From what I understand, my 99 turbo has either 215 or 218bhp? and weighs 1220kg? and a v5 type-r 280bhp? weighing 1100kg?
That's not quite correct. The standard Type R's are more or less the same weight as a UK car, only a handful of kilograms difference. You might even find a Type R - especially with aircon - ends up a tiny bit heavier than its UK equivalent.

Any replies would be greatly appreciated!
There's loads already written on this so search, or a simple browse of the forum, is your friend.
Old 28 February 2010, 01:04 AM
  #4  
m444rk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
m444rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks very much for the replies, very informative!

Originally Posted by Splitpin
There's loads already written on this so search, or a simple browse of the forum, is your friend.
I'd had a good search beforehand, but couldn't find much about the step up from a standard turbo to say an sti/type-r/p1 etc. but I've read a lot of the posts about type r's. I'm becoming more tempted as the days go on!

Last edited by m444rk; 28 February 2010 at 01:06 AM.
Old 28 February 2010, 01:56 PM
  #5  
V5RLTD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
V5RLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Devon
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do it mate, you wont regret it i promise
Old 28 February 2010, 02:40 PM
  #6  
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
jameswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 6,535
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Apart from the acceleration the main thing I noticed was the way it felt round the bends, the type r just seems to dig its heels in and hang on much better than a uk car.

The whole package just feels sharper and more agile though, the gearing can be annoying when you've been used to a UK car. Acceleration is a lot keener when you change up a gear as the ratios are closer and shorter, the gearstick throw is also physically shorter.
Old 28 February 2010, 06:43 PM
  #7  
m444rk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
m444rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks very much for the info! Acceleration is the thing i love the most, so any improvement from the standard would be great! I'm looking to spend around £6.5-7k on one, and from what i've seen i can probably get a nice example for this amount!

Trending Topics

Old 28 February 2010, 06:52 PM
  #8  
type-ellis
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
type-ellis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive had both, uk turbo and now i have the type r and yes the type r would eat my old turbo 2000 alive. I love my type r and would encourage anyone to get one, best car ive owned and i had alot.
Old 28 February 2010, 09:48 PM
  #9  
WaltonWRX
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
WaltonWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 876
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by type-ellis
Ive had both, uk turbo and now i have the type r and yes the type r would eat my old turbo 2000 alive. I love my type r and would encourage anyone to get one, best car ive owned and i had alot.
Also owned both and my current Type R i just wouldn't change
Old 28 February 2010, 10:08 PM
  #10  
johnlogie
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
johnlogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,089
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I quite like my ahem standardish turbo 2000 and im sure it would give a type r a run for its money
Old 28 February 2010, 10:24 PM
  #11  
stann01
Scooby Regular
 
stann01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: wiltshire
Posts: 657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i had to sell my old type r a few years ago because of financial reasons :-(
i went to a nissan gti
now got a u.k 2000, this aint a touch on the sti type r!!

GET ONE MATE THATS ALL I CAN SAY!
Old 28 February 2010, 10:30 PM
  #12  
beef-on-the-bone
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
beef-on-the-bone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: newquay
Posts: 6,880
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

type r every day, looking forward to getting one soon!!
Old 01 March 2010, 07:16 AM
  #13  
scooby1doo1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
scooby1doo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: could be near you
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are the Type R's really that much better the a p1??? And why as from a speed point of view not much in it, but the p1 must be better to live with having longer 5th.
Old 01 March 2010, 07:29 AM
  #14  
m444rk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
m444rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i'm almost definitely convinced now, however I don't think the shorter 5th gear will be much of an issue, as I don't really do any prolonged motorway driving.
Old 01 March 2010, 08:15 AM
  #15  
gpssti4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
gpssti4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by m444rk
i'm almost definitely convinced now, however I don't think the shorter 5th gear will be much of an issue, as I don't really do any prolonged motorway driving.
If it is an issue, you can get a V-Ltd with a longer 5th.
Old 01 March 2010, 09:48 AM
  #16  
MK2VTR8VALVE
Scooby Regular
 
MK2VTR8VALVE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: N.I
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Drive mine near enough everyday.
Full exhaust, decat, remap etc & a set of decent brakes. Then ya got yourself a 330bhp road going rally car! Literally lol!
Old 01 March 2010, 05:01 PM
  #17  
V5RLTD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
V5RLTD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Devon
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gpssti4
If it is an issue, you can get a V-Ltd with a longer 5th.
I had a v5 ltd and it didnt have the longer 5th? 80mph was 4000rpm. Wasnt it the last off the line v6's that had a longer 5th? Wheres Tonyburns when you need him
Old 18 March 2010, 02:20 PM
  #18  
shaggy6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
shaggy6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: In the middle somewhere..
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I was told it was a option on the v-ltd with the longer 5th..
With regards to the P1 vs Type r debarte their are pros and cons for both, type r is more of a track car/drivers car than a P1..
Get a type-r mate you will never look back!
Old 18 March 2010, 03:42 PM
  #19  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes believe the longer 5th was an option from the factory personally the turbo 2000 and type R are just totally different machines, the type R is a more manic monster where as the turbo 2000 is a more sedate everyday car, the turbo 2000 is probably slightly lighter though due to not having air con as standard but the dccd and shorter ratio's make up for this in the type r (and the extra 61bhp helps too )

Tony
Old 18 March 2010, 04:31 PM
  #20  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Shorter gearing = worse fuel consumption, and it's not THAT good in a Turbo 2000
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
S600HBY
Subaru Parts
7
30 September 2015 11:24 AM
jobegold@hotmail.co.uk
ScoobyNet General
2
27 September 2015 09:44 PM
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
0
27 September 2015 11:18 AM
StueyBII
General Technical
4
26 September 2015 12:35 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo 2000 vs Type R



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.