View Poll Results: How is Scoobynets loading performance for you TODAY?
Its fast, threads take under 4 seconds to load.
43
29.05%
Its ok, threads take between 5 and 8 seconds to load.
44
29.73%
Its slow, threads take between 9 and 12 seconds to load.
34
22.97%
Its terrible, threads take more than 13 seconds to load.
27
18.24%
Voters: 148. You may not vote on this poll
Scoobynet Performance Update. Feedback Welcomed.
#1
Administrator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Blackpool, Uk. Destination: Rev Limiter.
Posts: 4,464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Scoobynet Performance Update. Feedback Welcomed.
Hello Everyone,
As most of you will know, we have been suffering a DDOS attack from a malicious third party trying to take down IB's network for some weeks now and as a result we have been working flat out to alleviate the problems caused by this and whilst improving our Firewall bandwidth and installing other hardware had to take all the sites down a couple of times over the last week to finalise one or two of the upgrades on the servers.
Whilst the sites were offline the team also took the opportunity to roll out a few other upgrades we had planned on some sites at the same time, including some upgrades to the scoobnynet software. The result of this should hopefully be that 99% of you will no longer be having access problems, and we should all enjoy a speed improvement whilst browsing.
I would really appreciate some feedback on todays performance if you wouldn't mind guys as its not easy for the guys in the US to ascertain performance over here in the UK. I have generalised the poll to make it easy for folks to answer, but would appreciate some feedback by way of a reply too if you can spare the time please.
As most of you will know, we have been suffering a DDOS attack from a malicious third party trying to take down IB's network for some weeks now and as a result we have been working flat out to alleviate the problems caused by this and whilst improving our Firewall bandwidth and installing other hardware had to take all the sites down a couple of times over the last week to finalise one or two of the upgrades on the servers.
Whilst the sites were offline the team also took the opportunity to roll out a few other upgrades we had planned on some sites at the same time, including some upgrades to the scoobnynet software. The result of this should hopefully be that 99% of you will no longer be having access problems, and we should all enjoy a speed improvement whilst browsing.
I would really appreciate some feedback on todays performance if you wouldn't mind guys as its not easy for the guys in the US to ascertain performance over here in the UK. I have generalised the poll to make it easy for folks to answer, but would appreciate some feedback by way of a reply too if you can spare the time please.
Last edited by Evolution Stu; 23 December 2009 at 11:07 AM.
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (100)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 13,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Things are certainly improving as the access times are less than they have been of late, typically between 4-8 seconds to load a page for me.
Still not ideal with the occasional hanging page and ideally I would like to see a page load in 2-4 seconds but as I have said it is certainly getting better.
Still not ideal with the occasional hanging page and ideally I would like to see a page load in 2-4 seconds but as I have said it is certainly getting better.
#5
I have to agree with Alcazar, unfortunately, it hangs a lot... When it's working relatively normally, it is faster than it has been of late, but still far from ideal. Good luck with it...
(BTW tested my connection with other BBS, e.g. AVforums etc, and they all seemed to work ok FYI)
(BTW tested my connection with other BBS, e.g. AVforums etc, and they all seemed to work ok FYI)
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: England
Posts: 1,131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Still a lot slower than it used to be - although maybe marginally faster than it has been over the last month or so.
Replying to a thread is still a nightmare - takes 2 or 3 attempts each time.
Replying to a thread is still a nightmare - takes 2 or 3 attempts each time.
Last edited by renny; 23 December 2009 at 04:45 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
It is possible that the delays you are experiencing are caused by some issues we have identified with our new firewall and its interaction with our load balancer (we are updating them this afternoon).
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: www.southeastscoobies.co.uk
Posts: 2,947
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yet they've fixed something - for the last few days every page has loaded in less than 5 seconds, first time.
#21
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Replying to this just to see what, if any diffference, Adrian's update has made. I'll edit it to say.
THREE full thirty second timeouts. Fourth try gave me the duplicate message, so it HAD posted on the third try..
No change there, then
Plus the Firebug I loaded has jammed solid on 4.12s, won't change no matter what.
THREE full thirty second timeouts. Fourth try gave me the duplicate message, so it HAD posted on the third try..
No change there, then
Plus the Firebug I loaded has jammed solid on 4.12s, won't change no matter what.
Last edited by alcazar; 24 December 2009 at 12:55 PM.
#24
Supporting Member
iTrader: (28)
At my folks, so on Tiscali (think it got taken over by Carphone Warehouse / Talk Talk??) rather than my normal Sky home connection.
Have to say it's noticeably slower - the homepage is taking 10 seconds to load, very laggy.
Also noticed the connection on my iPhone, even via 3G has been worse over the last fortnight.
Have to say it's noticeably slower - the homepage is taking 10 seconds to load, very laggy.
Also noticed the connection on my iPhone, even via 3G has been worse over the last fortnight.
#26
Supporting Member
iTrader: (28)
I'd have to say the choices in this poll are somewhat unfairly biased.
5-8 seconds being labelled as "ok" just isn't right.
As a web programmer I know very well that response times should be equal or less than 2 seconds per request - if the site isn't meeting those criteria, something is very wrong!
2 seconds should be good. Instant would be excellent. Anything else is "mediocre" or "acceptable" - NOTHING more.
5-8 seconds is slow, not "ok".
5-8 seconds being labelled as "ok" just isn't right.
As a web programmer I know very well that response times should be equal or less than 2 seconds per request - if the site isn't meeting those criteria, something is very wrong!
2 seconds should be good. Instant would be excellent. Anything else is "mediocre" or "acceptable" - NOTHING more.
5-8 seconds is slow, not "ok".
Last edited by MrNoisy; 26 December 2009 at 04:20 PM.
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Romford
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
it just took 1 minute and 4 seconds to load this thread....https://www.scoobynet.com/private-sa...ts-thread.html
If you call that exceptable then I suggest you train for another vocation
If you call that exceptable then I suggest you train for another vocation
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
I'd have to say the choices in this poll are somewhat unfairly biased.
5-8 seconds being labelled as "ok" just isn't right.
As a web programmer I know very well that response times should be equal or less than 2 seconds per request - if the site isn't meeting those criteria, something is very wrong!
2 seconds should be good. Instant would be excellent. Anything else is "mediocre" or "acceptable" - NOTHING more.
5-8 seconds is slow, not "ok".
5-8 seconds being labelled as "ok" just isn't right.
As a web programmer I know very well that response times should be equal or less than 2 seconds per request - if the site isn't meeting those criteria, something is very wrong!
2 seconds should be good. Instant would be excellent. Anything else is "mediocre" or "acceptable" - NOTHING more.
5-8 seconds is slow, not "ok".