Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

New Focus RS V New STi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25 February 2009, 03:51 PM
  #1  
John Hughes
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
John Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default New Focus RS V New STi

Just bought a couple of magazines, Autocar and Autoexpress, to see what the new Focus RS could do. Autoexpress has a “shoot out” with a Mini John Cooper Works and the Impreza STi. Obviously as there is no mention of the R26.R the Mini is the winner. And as usual in this type of magazine they contradict their judgement at every turn, depending on what car they are talking about. Autoexpress cant justify the high price of AWD as on the day the test track was dry. With over 4000 of these RS's expected to be sold in Britain, I hope it doesn't rain then. The test is supposed to be for the new evolution of hot hatches that can be used as family cars, and the winner couldn't get a budgie in the back seat and a packet of trill in the boot. And by the way they never compared performance times. Autocar has the quote “ the focus is as fast as anything we've ever driven across country” then all they have to back this up is a very slow 0-62 time.

So as yet I've not learned very much except the focus is very slow 0-62 and the price is a bargain at £24995 compared to the £26040 STi. Actually the RS cost £850 more than the STi, as it was in blue (£395) had climate control (£750) and key-less entry (£750).

Also available for the RS partial leather trim is £500, SN is £750 and in that green colour, it sets you back a further £695.

I just hope all the hype on the RS is eventually justified (lets see some real head to heads first), as it's a nice looking car, and it gives me another option when it's time to trade in the STi (about 18 months).

PS. The Mini will not be an option.

Last edited by John Hughes; 25 February 2009 at 04:08 PM. Reason: Spelling!
Old 25 February 2009, 04:00 PM
  #2  
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,151
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I,ll keep my Classic i think...

On a serious note, 0-60 has never bothered me, i,m not really into bragging rights etc same with BHP. I think it,s a tuff one really, i mean, take the ST, it is VERY Tunable to 300+ with similar, if not more torque, i,d have to think very long & hard about parting with another 10k for the RS, BUT i guess that,s exactly it, IT,S AN RS, those 2 last letters will make it sell and i guess eventually be a collectors car, who knows??

I,d have to seriously conside the RA-R too if i was about to spend 25k on another car..

Decisons....

Last edited by Pete; 25 February 2009 at 04:01 PM.
Old 25 February 2009, 04:16 PM
  #3  
John Hughes
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
John Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
I,ll keep my Classic i think...

On a serious note, 0-60 has never bothered me, i,m not really into bragging rights etc same with BHP. I think it,s a tuff one really, i mean, take the ST, it is VERY Tunable to 300+ with similar, if not more torque, i,d have to think very long & hard about parting with another 10k for the RS, BUT i guess that,s exactly it, IT,S AN RS, those 2 last letters will make it sell and i guess eventually be a collectors car, who knows??

I,d have to seriously conside the RA-R too if i was about to spend 25k on another car..

Decisons....
I'm not implying that the 0-62 is that important, it's just the only actual figure they give. They shouldn't tell you it's super fast without backing it up. How fast is it or fast compared to what?
Old 25 February 2009, 04:19 PM
  #4  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Autocar is, well, a bit crap IMHO. They compromise objective journalism to get the story first! I prefer reading performance car.

Ns04
Old 25 February 2009, 04:19 PM
  #5  
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,151
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I,ve read somewhere the 0-60 is under 6 secs, 5.7, or 5.8 i think, what does your STI do it in John?? not alot quicker i,d imagine....
Old 25 February 2009, 04:39 PM
  #6  
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
EddScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: West Wales
Posts: 12,573
Received 64 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Before anyone else says it, why not just buy a slightly older, arguably better 06 Impreza STI?

The currrent breed of hatches look a bit geh IMO. I hated the driving position of the ST after being in my classic impreza - was like driving an MPV.

I agree with the Mini though - complete waste of time including it in a "practicle" hot hatch test. But then if you have the R26 with the roll cage you don't get rear seats. Although you'd probably get more shopping in.
Old 25 February 2009, 04:42 PM
  #7  
GazTheHat
Scooby Regular
 
GazTheHat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: 392/361 MY04 STi
Posts: 7,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love the new look of the RS and if it was AWD, i don't think there would be a comparison. As they stand though, i'd still get the STi. So the Focus coped with itself (apparently) in standard form. What about another 50bhp/50lb??

I like tinkering with cars and i'd like to retain some form of driveability. The STi will keep that.

If the new STi looked like the new RS, i'd of donned my balaclava, robbed post offices, old grannies and sold a kidney to get one.
Old 25 February 2009, 05:06 PM
  #8  
John Hughes
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
John Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pete
I,ve read somewhere the 0-60 is under 6 secs, 5.7, or 5.8 i think, what does your STI do it in John?? not alot quicker i,d imagine....
As tested in Autoexpress 25/02/09 - Focus 5.9 / STi 4.7
Old 25 February 2009, 05:11 PM
  #9  
Pete
Scooby Regular
 
Pete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 4,151
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

John,

I didn,t realise the new shape STI was that quick to 60..

Well there ya go, over 1 second..........that,s where the FWD suffers obviously, spinning of the line....


Edited to say, i,d still have the RS over that ugly ***** STI.......


Only kidding John................

Last edited by Pete; 25 February 2009 at 05:20 PM.
Old 25 February 2009, 05:11 PM
  #10  
scooby L
Scooby Regular
 
scooby L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: CHIPP'N HAM
Posts: 3,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John Hughes
As tested in Autoexpress 25/02/09 - Focus 5.9 / STi 4.7
4.7

I'd say that was slightly optimistic

How about 5.2 and not kill your clutch in 3 months..
Old 25 February 2009, 05:14 PM
  #11  
Shailan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Shailan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I prefer reading EVO, they have a group test FRS vs. R26r

Ford Focus RS & Renault Mgane R26-R | Car Review Group Test | evo
Old 25 February 2009, 05:15 PM
  #12  
scooby1doo1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
scooby1doo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: could be near you
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by John Hughes
As tested in Autoexpress 25/02/09 - Focus 5.9 / STi 4.7
I would like to see some body do a 0-60 time of 5.9 in a 300bhp ford focus, real world drivin side buy side ford vs scoob any scoob (turbo) scoob would win due to traction. Your ford will just light his/her tyres= buy buy mr ford.
Another thing who would pay 25k plus for a focus
Old 25 February 2009, 05:16 PM
  #13  
Shailan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Shailan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would rather have the Litchfield Type 20

Subaru Impreza Litchfield Type-20 | Car Review | evo
Old 25 February 2009, 06:54 PM
  #14  
stara
Scooby Regular
 
stara's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: dorset
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the litchfield motor is some machine, apparantly as quick to 60 and then on to 100 on a damp road as an audi R8 is on a dry road.
Old 25 February 2009, 07:17 PM
  #15  
Paul666
Scooby Regular
 
Paul666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Down the road from Oulton Park
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by scooby L
4.7

I'd say that was slightly optimistic

How about 5.2 and not kill your clutch in 3 months..
The 5.2 is what Subaru claim for the 0-62 time and those who have tested the car list 4.8 for 60 with the PPP or 330s looking at 4.4
Old 25 February 2009, 07:27 PM
  #16  
mit
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
mit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't subaru quote times with two people and a tank of fuel? They have always been quoted quicker 0-60 times when tested in magazines with just a driver.
Old 25 February 2009, 07:39 PM
  #17  
BigBez
Scooby Regular
 
BigBez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manchester
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i cant believe Ford havn't made the Focus RS 4 wheel drive based on the rally car. Ford owners have been let down enough with the focus rs (mk1) and the new ST being FWD it sucks to put it bluntley

theres rumours after the new RS there planning a Focus Cosworth which may finally bring us 4 wheel drive but i doubt it !

as people said no need to pay 25 K for a Focus RS still with Front wheel drive, you can get a Focus ST3 with under 30,000 miles on it for 10 K these days and another 2 - 3 K on a tuning package from Pumaspeed or Pumabuild which will see it max out at 350 BHP with 400 Ft/lb torque
Old 25 February 2009, 07:50 PM
  #18  
Mikkel
Scooby Regular
 
Mikkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North East
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If it had AWD I would pay £25k for it I have to say.
Old 25 February 2009, 07:52 PM
  #19  
+Doc+
Scooby Senior
 
+Doc+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sunny Ilson
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

4 wheel drive is not cost effective for them.
Old 25 February 2009, 07:53 PM
  #20  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RS is still only as fast to 60 as my classic was 10 years ago and it cost 4 times less

Old 25 February 2009, 07:58 PM
  #21  
Mikkel
Scooby Regular
 
Mikkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North East
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrighty338
RS is still only as fast to 60 as my classic was 10 years ago and it cost 4 times less

Let's be honest though, it looks 10 times better. And don't get me wrong, I aint no Impreza basher and the classic is my second favourite shape for the Impreza.
Old 25 February 2009, 08:02 PM
  #22  
nik52wrx
Scooby Regular
 
nik52wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would hardly say its very slow to 62
I've not had a performance car since i sold my STI PPP two years ago but a Focus RS could change that A new Impreza wouldn't.
Nik.


Originally Posted by John Hughes
So as yet I've not learned very much except the focus is very slow 0-62 and the price is a bargain at £24995 compared to the £26040 STi. Actually the RS cost £850 more than the STi, as it was in blue (£395) had climate control (£750) and key-less entry (£750).

Also available for the RS partial leather trim is £500, SN is £750 and in that green colour, it sets you back a further £695.

I just hope all the hype on the RS is eventually justified (lets see some real head to heads first), as it's a nice looking car, and it gives me another option when it's time to trade in the STi (about 18 months).

PS. The Mini will not be an option.

Last edited by nik52wrx; 25 February 2009 at 08:48 PM.
Old 25 February 2009, 08:20 PM
  #23  
Robocop
Scooby Regular
 
Robocop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Old Detroit aka Chippenham
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Focus RS v Evo X v BMW135i
Video: Ford Focus RS Triple Test - Sky Motoring Video
Old 25 February 2009, 08:34 PM
  #24  
DazW
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
DazW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fpmsl at John's post history ...It's like a one man mission to save IM & Subaru
Old 25 February 2009, 08:48 PM
  #25  
Boyakasha
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Boyakasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: just to your right
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The RS looks a million times better than the current MY08 STi Ugly Duckling. Real world driving is not about 0-60, the RS may be 1s slower to 60 but once moving it will probably be quicker than the STi as it does not have the trany loses. Also it should hold it's value very well.

.........I'm still keeping my Hawkeye STi though
Old 25 February 2009, 09:00 PM
  #26  
Mikkel
Scooby Regular
 
Mikkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North East
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boyakasha
.........I'm still keeping my Hawkeye STi though
Best of the Imprezas (excusing the 22B) unless they do something radically different in the future. I'll be keeping mine until they put AWD in the RS, so I'll be keeping mine
Old 25 February 2009, 09:20 PM
  #27  
colapepsi
Scooby Regular
 
colapepsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

To put it bluntly its time ford brought back the COSWORTH badge.

Iam sure a 4 wheel drive Focus cosworth would sell like hotcakes. So why are their no plans to bring the cossie name back. WHY FORD WHY????
Old 25 February 2009, 09:39 PM
  #28  
Boyakasha
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Boyakasha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: just to your right
Posts: 1,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by colapepsi
To put it bluntly its time ford brought back the COSWORTH badge.

Iam sure a 4 wheel drive Focus cosworth would sell like hotcakes. So why are their no plans to bring the cossie name back. WHY FORD WHY????
I'd second that, don't think it would happen though. I remember way back when there was rumours that there would be a cosworth MK1 Focus but it never happened.

I'm pretty sure the development costs of the AWD wouldn't pay off, and now that the economy is down the pan then we can keep on dreaming
Old 25 February 2009, 09:53 PM
  #29  
Andy-pay
Scooby Regular
 
Andy-pay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

fifth gear web site say

"As for a Subaru or Mitsubishi 4WD rally rep - forget it. If you are looking for a performance four-seater at this price point, you would be mad not to try the Focus RS. Even if you can't get on with the looks or the badge, it will give you a dynamic benchmark for everything else."

Interesting.
Old 25 February 2009, 10:01 PM
  #30  
Paul666
Scooby Regular
 
Paul666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Down the road from Oulton Park
Posts: 421
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Boyakasha
Real world driving is not about 0-60, the RS may be 1s slower to 60 but once moving it will probably be quicker than the STi as it does not have the trany loses.
Real world driving also involves wet roads with bends not just 20-60 mph runs but even on a dry road I'd still put my money on the STI. It was said that 200 bhp was the max you could run fwd then came the trick diffs and that went up to 250 but unless you're a very skillfull driver you can't use that, or more, on the roads without something bad happening.

Last edited by Paul666; 25 February 2009 at 10:14 PM.


Quick Reply: New Focus RS V New STi



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:13 PM.