Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

NAME AND SHAME???????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 07:52 PM
  #1  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Angry NAME AND SHAME???????

to cut a long story short...

i brought something from a member on here, it was posted to me, and when i recived it, it was broken.

I pm'ed the person, and they reply to my pms quite fast, which is good.

He has tried to claim on the insurance that it was posted with, but the post office said that there was not enough wrapping/protection on the good, and will not refund on the insurance.

this has been going on from around 18th october!!!

the seller has sent the post office a letter, stating that he is not happy about there decision, but nothing has come of it.

i pm the seller today, asking for a refund, and this was his reply.....


ive sent them a reply to the other letter. not heard anything since.

sorry but im not giving a refund out of my own pocket. if there was insufficient packaging on the parts then the post office shouldnt of let me send them. youve had the bits and its unfortunate that they broke. regardless of cost there was nothing stoping you from collecting in person. you chose to have delivery. i offerd delivery but dont offer money back. im not a shop im no company and im not going to give a refund.

ive done all i will do so far"






I really dont like to name and shame, but feel that i have nothing left to do now, and all options have been used up.


i feel that im out of pocket, when i should not be, and i feel that i have been very patient with this seller.


options please
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 07:55 PM
  #2  
wrighty338's Avatar
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: E Yorks
Default

name & shame
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #3  
Ianm1983's Avatar
Ianm1983
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: Anus of the world
Default

when you received it did you think it was underpackaged?

what were the parts?

If it were me id have gone 50/50 with you atleast
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
GC8's Avatar
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Default

This is not so clear cut. Youre presuming that you havent completed until you receive the item in a fit condition, but thats not always the case.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:06 PM
  #5  
rob2006's Avatar
rob2006
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,394
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Default

In what way were the goods sent? parcelfore? standard parcels?

All claims made are registered by the sender therefore its the senders responsibility to ensure the claim form is filled in properly. If the goods were not wrapped correctly then its his responsibility not the post office.

It says so on everything that the postoffice prints.

In the claim form there is a section requesting details about the packing, why didn't the seller over exaggerate how the item was packed. Obviously it wasnt packed properly or it wouldnt have broke and he obviously filled in the claim form to back that up. Hence the claim being refused.

Not good show at all mate, he should be offering a refund on recipt of the goods being returned to him, its his fault in the first place.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:11 PM
  #6  
mikey30's Avatar
mikey30
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: co.louth,eire
Default

name and shame IMO....
your out of pocket and not likely to receive anything!!!!
that sucks!!!
do you mind me asking what was broken???
was it properly packed in your opinion???
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:15 PM
  #7  
adzer's Avatar
adzer
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 0
Default

i sent a spoiler over to france and it was heavily bubble wrapped, still got broke during transit, i logged a complaint with the company who replied in a letter saying that it was not their responsibility. the buyer should of checked item for damage before signing for it, so for that matter i never refunded the guy as it was wrapped up as best as it could be.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:16 PM
  #8  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

abit more info here.

i helpted the seller out, and sent the claim form off with the packing it came with and any other parts it was asking for, as he said it would be easyer to do, in the time given by the post office (royal mail) asking for the packing etc.

the seller has been good, and has tried to sort this out, but to come down to not being wrapted up enough, they have broke in delivery, and im £50 out of pocket
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:17 PM
  #9  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

they were a set of classic wind deflectors in mint condition when he sent them, but now have a big crack/split right through one of them
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #10  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

shaggy1973 = detective work
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:23 PM
  #11  
Jamo's Avatar
Jamo
Cooking on Calor
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 23,346
Likes: 7
From: in a house full of girls!
Default

your not allowed to name and shame on here mate

https://www.scoobynet.com/private-sa...eflectors.html
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:27 PM
  #12  
webby v7 slipperwagon's Avatar
webby v7 slipperwagon
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 3
From: Who are you ? the tax man!
Default

Originally Posted by shaggy1973
your not allowed to name and shame on here mate

https://www.scoobynet.com/private-sa...eflectors.html
Agreed.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #13  
pikeywrx's Avatar
pikeywrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 794
Likes: 0
Default

Glad you did as i have loads off stuff being posted out didnt want anybody to think it was me!
but then everyone that buys stuff off me puts that im honust and there exactly as described good looking funny and intelligent...... ok made the last bit up lol
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 12:53 PM
  #14  
Ian's Avatar
Ian
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 7,845
Likes: 1
From: Cambridge
Default

any info on what i could do if anything?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 01:37 PM
  #15  
Chris.B's Avatar
Chris.B
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 731
Likes: 0
From: Glossop
Default

A nearly 300 mile round trip would of been a little OTT I recon.
It's a shame when something like this happens but I think a fair outcome would be to get a £25 refund off the seller.
Failing that, they're future sales on here might not be sold very easily...
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 01:45 PM
  #16  
jonny_693's Avatar
jonny_693
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 1
From: Hudds
Default

Originally Posted by Chris.B
A nearly 300 mile round trip would of been a little OTT I recon.
It's a shame when something like this happens but I think a fair outcome would be to get a £25 refund off the seller.
Failing that, they're future sales on here might not be sold very easily...
Aggreed, one of them is still useable. Its unfortunate but it would be hard to pack them in a way that they could not be broken without going OTT.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 01:49 PM
  #17  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

FWIW it's definitely the sender's responsibility to ensure safe packaging of goods.
The sender is the owner of the 'contract' between themselves and the carrier.
The only time this does not apply in my experience is when a buyer signs for broken goods as received in satisfactory condition.
It's the sender's responsibility to ensure goods are adequately wrapped, and to make the claim if things get broken. The buyer can opt to make the claim if they so wish.
None of this helps you get your money back I know, but the seller has no argument here. It's his (her?) problem and they should at least refund you the price paid for the goods.

Best of luck mate.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 02:53 PM
  #18  
bluenosewrx's Avatar
bluenosewrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,144
Likes: 0
From: Lanarkshire
Default

All this is getting well out of hand IMO, there HAS to be some kind of Feedback system introduced for sellers and buyers,

i have just purchased a set of prodrive grills for my hawkeye, the cheque cleared on the 1st of jan, i have pm'ed the seller twice now but no luck and the last time i looked he has not been online in ages,

So i looked up the last things he sold and PM'ed the guys.

Guess what: the last guy had to threaten him with a court ordre to get the goods, i know in hindsight that i should have checked up first but i will not be caught out again.

Something needs to be done as this type of thing between sellers and buyers is now commonplace.

Back on topic, its sellers responsibility mate, rais a small claims action as i reckon i might have to,lol.

Mac
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 03:18 PM
  #20  
BigAl024's Avatar
BigAl024
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: Dundee
Default

Funny how he would rather sell em on here, than Ebay......

You can at least open up a dispute on ebay to get your money back.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 03:44 PM
  #22  
EAndy's Avatar
EAndy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Default

Sender should send it packaged in a well fashioned manner
Buyer shouldn't sign for anything without checking

Part of the reason the post office won't push through a refund even if they're not saying so is because the items were signed for or taken on delivery therefore if you followed the matter up it would be your word against theres, they'll just claim they were fine when delivered.

Be nice to see some form of agreement though, if I was the seller I think i'd have offered some form of cash offer like £20 back, I feel for the buyer but its also not the sellers fault (I assume you saw pics before they were sent showing they weren't damaged when sent?)
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 04:04 PM
  #23  
APIDavid's Avatar
APIDavid
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 6,377
Likes: 3
From: @Junc 12, M40 Warwicksh; 01926 614522 CV33 9PL -Use 9GX for Satnav. South Mids Alcatek ECu dealer
Default

I would not have mailed out wind deflectors like that to anywhere The likelihood of them getting across our yard even, by any sort of parcel delivery service unbroken, is very low.

You would need to put them in a much bigger box. with tons of bubble to even stand a half chance.

The seller should meet you halfway on this in my opinion.

We won't send out bonnets for the same reason, they always end up with two little hooks on the pointy bits by the windscreen and then all sorts of aggro over who packed properly and who signed for it "undamaged" and soon. Couriers or the mail, are all as bad as each other they will wriggle out if they can. Don't get me started on Saturday deliveries or timed ones either.

We just shipped an alloy bonnet to Luxembourg in December, they used their courier, as I would not use mine for fear of the above.

They called up to say the bonnet was a really nice one, until their courier had damaged it...... BUT it was Ok they could sort it out.

Some things are only collectable in my opinion.

David APi

Agents for:
Simtek, the most exciting new Ecu for years
Buddy Club exhausts
Scoobysportexhausts
Eibach suspension
Hybrid front mount intercooler kits
AP Racing brakes and clutches
And of course; the well known APi Performance Exedy organic clutch

www.apiengines.com

01926 614333
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 04:16 PM
  #24  
EddScott's Avatar
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,575
Likes: 65
From: West Wales
Default

I thought that it was the sellers responsibility to ensure safe delivery?

You could also say the buyer should check the contents of the package and if its damaged, sign for it but write damaged and take a photocopy ( I got bollcked royally in an old job for not checking a jetwasher cowling wasn't damaged - it was, I got a bollcking)

I would also be reluctant to refund the full amount as I would have acted in good faith - as I'm sure the OP has. Personally 50:50 to keep the peace.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 04:34 PM
  #25  
+Doc+'s Avatar
+Doc+
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 9
From: Sunny Ilson
Default

If it is signed for in good condition then normal carriers do not pay diddly in compensation.
TNT are sods for breaking stuff.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #26  
fmp's Avatar
fmp
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,178
Likes: 2
From: Chichester, West Sussex
Default

i sent some newage wind deflectors once. and knowing that under certain starin they would brake i reinforced the box with bamboo canes (like the ones used in gardens). Plus the usual bubble wrap etc.

If your sending something delicate like that, then you need to wrap, double wrap, reinforce and wrap again!

As for the actual problem..... is a tough one. I reckon you should get your refund and let him fight it out with the postage service for the compensation.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 05:02 PM
  #27  
Boro's Avatar
Boro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 0
From: Cornwall
Default

Small claims court. Open and shut case.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 05:10 PM
  #28  
P555SBR's Avatar
P555SBR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: derbyshire
Default

in my opinion the seller should at least give you half back if im ever sending fragile stought through the post i make a ply wood box inside the carboard one and fill it with bubble wrap and shredded paper never had any problems and i get rid of all my unwanted mail
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #30  
The Rig's Avatar
The Rig
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 7,891
Likes: 8
Default

You can see it from the sellers point of view tho,he has a good item,not broken,packages it well enough and employs a courier/post office to send it,thats why he paid £x for the service.

then THEY break it.

so its the couriers fault

so why should the sender be out of pocket,he didnt break it, you didnt break it, courier broke it.

if it was packaged wel enough,was it ? then brute force was applied so courier is at fault.

its like taking your car to have a service.

they then send it to a valeters as u have a posh service centre,the valeter scratch the car,is the service centre at fault ?
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 PM.