Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Optimax VS V-Power - remap question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 10:23 AM
  #1  
[MikeyB]'s Avatar
[MikeyB]
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage
Default Optimax VS V-Power - remap question

Morning all, I have a question about my remap.

I got a new engine slapped in about 6 months ago and had an EcuTEK remap based on the 99ron Optimax fuel.

Would there be any benefit to now get a remap on the V-Power fuel as I’ve been told it’s a higher ron fuel?

My car is a MY03 WRX with an STI engine running 330 BHP.

Cheers, MikeyB
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 10:26 AM
  #2  
wrxcraig's Avatar
wrxcraig
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
From: with your sister
Default

i think a few ppl are getting poor fuel consumption on v-power due to not being remapped, i know i am, i think im getting about 200miles to a full tank.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 10:36 AM
  #3  
[MikeyB]'s Avatar
[MikeyB]
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage
Default

I'm getting between 180 and 190 per tank every time.

I've got the K&N Typhoon (wing) induction kit sat in my loft, I think I'll stick that on too and go for a remap.

Does anyone know what RON (officially) Shell has given V-Power?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 10:39 AM
  #4  
weemac2000's Avatar
weemac2000
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
Default

Optimax was 98 RON, V-Power is 99
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 11:12 AM
  #5  
[MikeyB]'s Avatar
[MikeyB]
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage
Default

Originally Posted by weemac2000
Optimax was 98 RON, V-Power is 99
Hi mate, is this official from Shell?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 11:21 AM
  #6  
[MikeyB]'s Avatar
[MikeyB]
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage
Default

Just found this to confirm the 99 ron.

Shell in the UK - About Shell V-Power
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 11:50 AM
  #7  
PPPRob's Avatar
PPPRob
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Essex/E London
Default

Originally Posted by [MikeyB]
I'm getting between 180 and 190 per tank every time.

I've got the K&N Typhoon (wing) induction kit sat in my loft, I think I'll stick that on too and go for a remap.

Does anyone know what RON (officially) Shell has given V-Power?
That was going to be my suggestion.

Wait until you fit another mod that would require it and then get the remap done.

Otherwise the cost would outway the gains I'd have thought.

Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jan 30, 2007 | 12:21 PM
  #8  
funkyspider's Avatar
funkyspider
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire & District Subaru Owners
Default

Here's a question about after mapping on V-Power. Is it safe to put a 10er normal super unleaded in if caught short between shell stations. Obviously not driving on big boost. Newage ECU, which I believe should cope with adjusting to different fuel types without reset

Cheers.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 12:31 PM
  #9  
[MikeyB]'s Avatar
[MikeyB]
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
From: Shell Garage
Default

If you have already had a remap, can the ECU still adjust to different grades of fuel?? as far as I am aware, it can't??

I.E, if you map for Optimax (V-Power) and then put 95 ron fuel into the car, the ecu will NOT adjust thus you losing performance, is this correct?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 12:58 PM
  #10  
funkyspider's Avatar
funkyspider
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire & District Subaru Owners
Default

It's not the loosing performance I'd be bothered about, it's the DET and associated problems.

The newage ECU will still retard itself after a remap as its knock sensor still works, it's just how far, and whether it can adjust enough to cope with a bit of super unleaded every now and then.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 01:24 PM
  #11  
Izzy's Avatar
Izzy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: From the roads of South East Essex....
Default

I had my STI5 ECUTEK remapped on V Power. It's by no means heavily modded, just the usual exhaust & filter type thing, but mpg is not great, so I dont think the economy from V Power is as good as it seemed to be from Optimax.

If you have a car mapped for Optimax, like it's been said, I wouldnt have thought a remap would be worth-while for V Power unless additional modifications are made....

As for using lower grade fuel in the absence of a suitable Shell stn, I alway carry a couple of bottles of octain boost, just to add to normal super in such eventualities - & then head for the nearest Shell garage whilst keeping off boost. It's only happened once or twice, but you can get caught out....

Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 02:58 PM
  #12  
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Default

Please... Unless you're running horrendous levels of boost a tenner's worth of SUL is not going to kill the car. For every person on here who knows Scoobs inside out and wouldn't dream of polluting their tank of V-Power there are 50 actual owners out there putting in whatever ****e from whatever garage they happen to be passing without breaking down 25 yards up the road.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 03:05 PM
  #13  
mgcvk's Avatar
mgcvk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,884
Likes: 9
Default

Originally Posted by Jap2Scrap
Please... Unless you're running horrendous levels of boost a tenner's worth of SUL is not going to kill the car. For every person on here who knows Scoobs inside out and wouldn't dream of polluting their tank of V-Power there are 50 actual owners out there putting in whatever ****e from whatever garage they happen to be passing without breaking down 25 yards up the road.
Quite right. I wouldn't be too happy about using 95 ron on a regular basis but don't worry at all about using any 97 ron SUL of any type if I can't get to a Shell or Tesco. Its interesting so many people are getting bad mpg on V-Power. I'm getting around 60-70 miles less per tank on V-Power than Optimax, with mixed driving and lots of motorway.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 03:09 PM
  #14  
wrxcraig's Avatar
wrxcraig
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,603
Likes: 0
From: with your sister
Default

my car was mapped on optimax and when i brought the car there wasnt a shell station about so i put £10 worth of unleaded in, didnt use the boost all the way home and it ran fine
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2007 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
funkyspider's Avatar
funkyspider
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,335
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire & District Subaru Owners
Default

Ok, Ta. Sensible question to ask I thought as I'm not a mapper and don't fully appreciate the fuel tolerances that the ecu can deal with

In fact has there been any cases of someone killing a Newage with Det, when the MAF is working normally, or are the ECU's now clever enough retard sufficiently or limit boost in a limp mode to protect it (01 >) ?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #16  
JPS3290's Avatar
JPS3290
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: County Durham
Default

Had my 02 STI recently mapped by Andy Forrest on V-Power and he said it's not a problem to revert to 97 if your caught short but it will reduce the power while doing so. He said to keep away from 95 now i'm mapped to V-Power though.

Mods are K&N Panel filter,Ninja backbox, straight through centre pipe, TSL second de-cat pipe, Ninja Sports cats downpipe.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
Nov 4, 2021 07:12 PM
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
IanG1983
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
2
Oct 6, 2015 03:08 PM
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
Oct 2, 2015 05:26 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
Sep 25, 2015 08:52 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 AM.