Should a classic WRX be noticably quicker than a UK classic?
#1
Should a classic WRX be noticably quicker than a UK classic?
As above, your thoughts?
From what I've read the WRX models are 270 bhp standard using optimax and fuel additives and a standard UK classic is 214bhp. What are peoples personal experiences on the differences on the road between the two standard?
There is reason behind my thinking after a short blast tonight.
Robert.
From what I've read the WRX models are 270 bhp standard using optimax and fuel additives and a standard UK classic is 214bhp. What are peoples personal experiences on the differences on the road between the two standard?
There is reason behind my thinking after a short blast tonight.
Robert.
#2
yeah imports are quicker than uk cars this is helped by the import gearbox more suited to the quick sprint but uk gets better fuel economy u get better spec with an import to such as air con and stuff. I think it is around 40 bhp difference between the two if they are in standard trim
#3
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Here and there
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
where did you read that 93-95 wrx is 240 ps 96-97 260ps 98-00 280ps all on 100RON fuel and yes they are noticeably quicker than a uk classic turbo providing you are comparing standard models
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Near Cardiff, South Wales
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You should most certainly be a bit quicker with your import than a UK car as long as your car is set up properly, some of the most modded cars i've brought in from Japan have been a tad dissapointing to say the least. If your import has been thrashed for years and goes up against a nice looked after UK car then the chances are you'll get ya *** kicked!!
I've just sold a Colin Macrae with 103k under her belt but with a fantastic Subaru history that would definately keep up with or even beat many imported WRX cars as she ran so well and had been kept in tip tip order.
Just had in an STI Type UK tonight (it's a hard old life eh!!) and i do find this noticeable slower than the Jap type i had in last week even though she's a low miler with FSH.
Dave.
I've just sold a Colin Macrae with 103k under her belt but with a fantastic Subaru history that would definately keep up with or even beat many imported WRX cars as she ran so well and had been kept in tip tip order.
Just had in an STI Type UK tonight (it's a hard old life eh!!) and i do find this noticeable slower than the Jap type i had in last week even though she's a low miler with FSH.
Dave.
#7
I have a MY95 Classic Wagon and had a brief encounter with a WRX saloon this evening from 2nd, 3rd, 4th and just sat on his tail easily, really thought it would pull away dramatically. Probably running a litle rough.
Nice blast.
Robert.
Nice blast.
Robert.
Trending Topics
#9
must have been rough because correct me if i am wrong but do the wagons not run less boost than the saloons and u only see a difference if both cars are standard which is rare these days
#15
Scooby Regular
TD05 makes huge difference IMHO having owned two WRX's and driven the UK turbo.
Never re-mapped any of my imports and have imported them both myself, so they were never done prior to my ownership, and have not gone bang
The JDM's have alloy bits and bobs that decreases the over all weight too, and less weight equals better performance.
Never re-mapped any of my imports and have imported them both myself, so they were never done prior to my ownership, and have not gone bang
The JDM's have alloy bits and bobs that decreases the over all weight too, and less weight equals better performance.
#16
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by yodajedimaster
I have a MY95 Classic Wagon and had a brief encounter with a WRX saloon this evening from 2nd, 3rd, 4th and just sat on his tail easily, really thought it would pull away dramatically. Probably running a litle rough.
Nice blast.
Robert.
Nice blast.
Robert.
#20
imports do not need mapped to prevent the engine going bang biggest load of **** i have ever heard. think thats what people tell them selves to ,ake them feel better about buying a slower, heavier uk car
#21
Originally Posted by 95blackWRX
imports do not need mapped to prevent the engine going bang biggest load of **** i have ever heard. think thats what people tell them selves to ,ake them feel better about buying a slower, heavier uk car
i think people are far too paranoid,and as far as iam concerned i always have and always will buy jap
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bridgend, S Wales
Posts: 2,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm in a perfect position to comment on this, as my first scoob was a MY95 WRX and current a MY00 UK Turbo.
The WRX was fully decatted with a green filter, standard TD05 and no remap run on Optimax alone (Z4 ecu no activity on knocklink, naturally upped boost via decat).
Didn't dyno it but guesstimated 270bhp - 256bhp standard (but on 100 ron) so about 250, plus about 20 from decat and filter.
When I bought the MY00, bog standard apart from Magnex centre and backbox.
The WRX was definitely much quicker. When I bought the MY00 a dyno printout came with it 215.5bhp - bog standard power even with Magnex backbox (dyno'd before centre decat).
When I had the WRX, had a couple of gentle 'plays' with some UK turbos and an RB5 and it was noticeably quicker.
Since I have bought the MY00 however, after Ninja Sports Cat, JR panel filter and an Ecutek3 remap I am now running 273bhp/273lbft.
It now feels just as fast as the WRX did, so I reckon the WRX was running 270ish as I originally thought.
Although the MY00 has TD04, and the WRX had a TD05 I must admit that from memory they feel very similar - I remember the WRX spooling up @ 2500 ish as does the MY00.
The WRX was fully decatted with a green filter, standard TD05 and no remap run on Optimax alone (Z4 ecu no activity on knocklink, naturally upped boost via decat).
Didn't dyno it but guesstimated 270bhp - 256bhp standard (but on 100 ron) so about 250, plus about 20 from decat and filter.
When I bought the MY00, bog standard apart from Magnex centre and backbox.
The WRX was definitely much quicker. When I bought the MY00 a dyno printout came with it 215.5bhp - bog standard power even with Magnex backbox (dyno'd before centre decat).
When I had the WRX, had a couple of gentle 'plays' with some UK turbos and an RB5 and it was noticeably quicker.
Since I have bought the MY00 however, after Ninja Sports Cat, JR panel filter and an Ecutek3 remap I am now running 273bhp/273lbft.
It now feels just as fast as the WRX did, so I reckon the WRX was running 270ish as I originally thought.
Although the MY00 has TD04, and the WRX had a TD05 I must admit that from memory they feel very similar - I remember the WRX spooling up @ 2500 ish as does the MY00.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Gallifrey, but known to travel the universe
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Some interesting responses,
Re Evo magazine Sept 99 did a greatest 4x4 of the time,
A 215 BHP UK turbo lapped Mira in 49.5 secs, A 276 BHP STI Version V lapped Mira in 49.5 secs, A 237 BHP RB5 did it in 48.0 secs
Proves the point, more BHP doesn't guarantee the fastest car !
Re Evo magazine Sept 99 did a greatest 4x4 of the time,
A 215 BHP UK turbo lapped Mira in 49.5 secs, A 276 BHP STI Version V lapped Mira in 49.5 secs, A 237 BHP RB5 did it in 48.0 secs
Proves the point, more BHP doesn't guarantee the fastest car !
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
WRX upto Sept 1994 won't be alot different to a UK from 1994 - 2000.
Upto 1994 WRX were only 240ps on 100RON, so that's probably about 220BHP (ish) on 97RON.
They will 'feel' quicker, however due to the different gearing.
They also run exactky the same boost pressure @ 11.47psi, but a slightly different ignition & fuel map.
Also to clear a few things up.. UK Wagons have TD05 Turbo's and are the same as saloons. WRX Wagons are TD04 and only 220ps. So a WRX wagon would probably be slower then a UK wagon or saloon.
Upto 1994 WRX were only 240ps on 100RON, so that's probably about 220BHP (ish) on 97RON.
They will 'feel' quicker, however due to the different gearing.
They also run exactky the same boost pressure @ 11.47psi, but a slightly different ignition & fuel map.
Also to clear a few things up.. UK Wagons have TD05 Turbo's and are the same as saloons. WRX Wagons are TD04 and only 220ps. So a WRX wagon would probably be slower then a UK wagon or saloon.
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Here and there
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Deano1983
Only if you dont keep up with the services and put the right fuel in!!!
#28
My 97MY uk turbo2000 60k miles, with only a STi7 rear box and Pipercross panel filter - running on 1/2 tesco unleaded & 1/2 optimax clocked 241.9 bhp recently...
Mick
Mick