ECUTEK v PPP
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ECUTEK v PPP
Hi all,
I'm about to take my first steps into modification of my bugeye WRX. I was close to ordering PPP a few weeks ago but had second thoughts when it came to justifying the £1600 outlay.
I have been looking around and taking advice from people on this and the S.Wales forums and have been left in a quandry.
Do I buy?
a) PPP, keeping in mind my car is a '51 plate so I don't have a warranty to protect.
b) an ecutek remap by Powerstation in Tewkesbury, including an uprated fuel pump. I'll also get a Prodrive/H&S/Scoobysport backbox fitted.
Both options offer similar power increases but the ecutek option should leave me with a few hundred quid left in my wallet.
I'm about to take my first steps into modification of my bugeye WRX. I was close to ordering PPP a few weeks ago but had second thoughts when it came to justifying the £1600 outlay.
I have been looking around and taking advice from people on this and the S.Wales forums and have been left in a quandry.
Do I buy?
a) PPP, keeping in mind my car is a '51 plate so I don't have a warranty to protect.
b) an ecutek remap by Powerstation in Tewkesbury, including an uprated fuel pump. I'll also get a Prodrive/H&S/Scoobysport backbox fitted.
Both options offer similar power increases but the ecutek option should leave me with a few hundred quid left in my wallet.
Last edited by Trap2Terrorist; 10 September 2005 at 03:50 PM.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East - "Keep Attacking The Ring"
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Got the same car and in the same position.
I'd definately say to go down the EcuTek road. I am sure you will end with more power than if you'd gone with PPP. It should be a lot cheaper and there are far better exhaust systems than whats included in the PPP IMHO.
Only advantage to having PPP I can see is a slightly better resale value as it is an upgrade most buyers will understand. We are only talking about a few hundreds pounds tops though.
I've already got an exhaust with partial decat and an uprated air filter so was wondering how much Powerstation are quoting you for a remap with uprated fuel pump fitted?
Cheers
I'd definately say to go down the EcuTek road. I am sure you will end with more power than if you'd gone with PPP. It should be a lot cheaper and there are far better exhaust systems than whats included in the PPP IMHO.
Only advantage to having PPP I can see is a slightly better resale value as it is an upgrade most buyers will understand. We are only talking about a few hundreds pounds tops though.
I've already got an exhaust with partial decat and an uprated air filter so was wondering how much Powerstation are quoting you for a remap with uprated fuel pump fitted?
Cheers
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
They quoted me
- Fuel pump @ £115.00 + VAT and £40.00 + VAT to fit.
- The ECUTEK costs £550.00 + VAT
Powerstation reckon I should get around 260 - 270 bhp with a simple ecutek and pump. I'll then sort a back box from eBay or somewhere and then a decat sometime in the future.
Have you been quoted for an ECUTEK and if so, how much?
Cheers
- Fuel pump @ £115.00 + VAT and £40.00 + VAT to fit.
- The ECUTEK costs £550.00 + VAT
Powerstation reckon I should get around 260 - 270 bhp with a simple ecutek and pump. I'll then sort a back box from eBay or somewhere and then a decat sometime in the future.
Have you been quoted for an ECUTEK and if so, how much?
Cheers
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Old Detroit aka Chippenham
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I wasn't concerned about keeping my warranty on my MY04 STi, I would have gone down a different route than the PPP that I currently have fitted.
Since warranty is not a concern in your case, I'd be looking at Ecutek and some other subtle mods.
Since warranty is not a concern in your case, I'd be looking at Ecutek and some other subtle mods.
Last edited by Robocop; 10 September 2005 at 04:29 PM.
#6
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: stewarton Ayrshire
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hi
prev owner had my car tekecu remap. When he put it on a rolling road bhp was at 290 ono car has a few extras like de-cat and a new turbo. I think that i get more power from that than i could from ppp.Plus it runs like a dream and pulls like a train and just keeps on going.
ed
prev owner had my car tekecu remap. When he put it on a rolling road bhp was at 290 ono car has a few extras like de-cat and a new turbo. I think that i get more power from that than i could from ppp.Plus it runs like a dream and pulls like a train and just keeps on going.
ed
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi,
It's beginning to sound like the ecutek is the way to go. I'm looking forward to having the extra horses available, I must admit I was expecting more from a WRX than I got when I bought it. From reading posts on various forums, the bugeye is obviously underpowered compared to most (ALL) other versions.
£550 + VAT seems pretty good, TSL charge £650.
Anyone know what effect it has on fuel consumption?
It's beginning to sound like the ecutek is the way to go. I'm looking forward to having the extra horses available, I must admit I was expecting more from a WRX than I got when I bought it. From reading posts on various forums, the bugeye is obviously underpowered compared to most (ALL) other versions.
£550 + VAT seems pretty good, TSL charge £650.
Anyone know what effect it has on fuel consumption?
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: stewarton Ayrshire
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trap2Terrorist
Hi,
It's beginning to sound like the ecutek is the way to go. I'm looking forward to having the extra horses available, I must admit I was expecting more from a WRX than I got when I bought it. From reading posts on various forums, the bugeye is obviously underpowered compared to most (ALL) other versions.
£550 + VAT seems pretty good, TSL charge £650.
Anyone know what effect it has on fuel consumption?
It's beginning to sound like the ecutek is the way to go. I'm looking forward to having the extra horses available, I must admit I was expecting more from a WRX than I got when I bought it. From reading posts on various forums, the bugeye is obviously underpowered compared to most (ALL) other versions.
£550 + VAT seems pretty good, TSL charge £650.
Anyone know what effect it has on fuel consumption?
i still get about 290 to 300 to a tank
ed
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What scooby are you driving, 290bhp sounds nice???
Originally Posted by eddie c
I do not use much more fuel than two of my mates who have standered scoobys.
i still get about 290 to 300 to a tank
ed
i still get about 290 to 300 to a tank
ed
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East - "Keep Attacking The Ring"
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trap2Terrorist
They quoted me
- Fuel pump @ £115.00 + VAT and £40.00 + VAT to fit.
- The ECUTEK costs £550.00 + VAT
Powerstation reckon I should get around 260 - 270 bhp with a simple ecutek and pump. I'll then sort a back box from eBay or somewhere and then a decat sometime in the future.
Have you been quoted for an ECUTEK and if so, how much?
Cheers
- Fuel pump @ £115.00 + VAT and £40.00 + VAT to fit.
- The ECUTEK costs £550.00 + VAT
Powerstation reckon I should get around 260 - 270 bhp with a simple ecutek and pump. I'll then sort a back box from eBay or somewhere and then a decat sometime in the future.
Have you been quoted for an ECUTEK and if so, how much?
Cheers
I've got an H&S de-cat centre and non-resonating centre section with a Scoobyworld Afterburner Vortex backbox. I also have a green panel filter. That lot cost about £600, added approximately 20bhp and gave it the sort of sound I wanted. I'd recommend you do the exhaust mods before the remap if possible. The map will then be tailored to the exhaust changes, releasing more power.
I am expecting around 270bhp when remapped.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East - "Keep Attacking The Ring"
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also don't worry too much about exact BHP figures. These vary rolling road to rolling road. It will be significantly faster on the road, delivering the same power as before a full 1,000 rpm lower in the rev range. Gone will be the lack of torque below 3,000 rpm and it won't start losing power over 6,000 rpm like before.
#12
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: stewarton Ayrshire
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trap2Terrorist
What scooby are you driving, 290bhp sounds nice???
#13
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm possibly looking at getting a Scoobysport backbox but not the full system or decat yet.
I know another forum user from S.Wales who's looking to get an ecutek remap done by Powerstation - we could try a group buy and see if we can get a discount???
I know another forum user from S.Wales who's looking to get an ecutek remap done by Powerstation - we could try a group buy and see if we can get a discount???
Originally Posted by Ben WRX Bug-Eye
Thats not bad the £550.00 + VAT for the remap (some places charge £650.00 + VAT). I heard that it's recommended to get an uprated fuel pump too, but glad it looks like they are happy using the standard regulator. I expect I will be taking mine to them for identical work. They have a good reputation.
I've got an H&S de-cat centre and non-resonating centre section with a Scoobyworld Afterburner Vortex backbox. I also have a green panel filter. That lot cost about £600, added approximately 20bhp and gave it the sort of sound I wanted. I'd recommend you do the exhaust mods before the remap if possible. The map will then be tailored to the exhaust changes, releasing more power.
I am expecting around 270bhp when remapped.
I've got an H&S de-cat centre and non-resonating centre section with a Scoobyworld Afterburner Vortex backbox. I also have a green panel filter. That lot cost about £600, added approximately 20bhp and gave it the sort of sound I wanted. I'd recommend you do the exhaust mods before the remap if possible. The map will then be tailored to the exhaust changes, releasing more power.
I am expecting around 270bhp when remapped.
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Register with http://photobucket.com/ (free) so you can upload pictures to there, you can then load them onto this site......
Originally Posted by eddie c
first reg in 99. wrx gold alloys, tek remap, new turbo with a data monitor that i can not use. lovely car if i new how to post pics i would.
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East - "Keep Attacking The Ring"
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Trap2Terrorist
I'm possibly looking at getting a Scoobysport backbox but not the full system or decat yet.
I know another forum user from S.Wales who's looking to get an ecutek remap done by Powerstation - we could try a group buy and see if we can get a discount???
I know another forum user from S.Wales who's looking to get an ecutek remap done by Powerstation - we could try a group buy and see if we can get a discount???
I am also going to have Eibach's fitted with full geometry at Powerstation at some point in the future. They are one of the few places I'd trust with my car.
Cheers
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's reassuring to hear, I've been worried about entrusting someone with my car and they were recommended to me by someone from this forum.
They seem to get good comments from most people who know them.
I am also going to have Eibach's fitted with full geometry at Powerstation at some point in the future. They are one of the few places I'd trust with my car.
Cheers
They seem to get good comments from most people who know them.
Originally Posted by Ben WRX Bug-Eye
I am also going to have Eibach's fitted with full geometry at Powerstation at some point in the future. They are one of the few places I'd trust with my car.
Cheers
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: www.sox-japoc.co.uk
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had my 01 WRX done this week, with PPP back box and centre cat, did not mention the need to uprate the fuel pump at all, makes 265 BHP & 276 ft/lb torque, very nice!! Check the price with Powerstation, eveyone charges about the same; £550 for the Ecutek (licence) then £100 odd to set it up, hence £650 plus VAT... around £760 all in, money well spent IMO.
Last edited by BrynO; 10 September 2005 at 09:29 PM.
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Isleworth, MSOC
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Having an ECU remap on a WRX will certainly require a decat up pipe. The WRX up pipe is very restricted, and actually starts fragmenting with the extra heat created by having a remap! You may also like to consider a sports cat downpipe, then of course add your backbox of your choice. Do these things first then get the remap! Hope this helps a bit.
#20
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Something like the Afterburner Up Pipe? Powerstation didn't mention that I may need to replace that, only the fuel pump........
Originally Posted by GREGGYG
Having an ECU remap on a WRX will certainly require a decat up pipe. The WRX up pipe is very restricted, and actually starts fragmenting with the extra heat created by having a remap! You may also like to consider a sports cat downpipe, then of course add your backbox of your choice. Do these things first then get the remap! Hope this helps a bit.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Without wishing to contradict you Greg your EGTs won't be discernably different after the remap, and you certainly don't need to do the up-pipe.
High EGT's are typically caused by lean running and are a symptom of increasing boost without sufficient fuelling; if you simply want to turn up the boost with an mbc then it can cause a problem. A properly written fuel map should reduce egt's.
Most people change the up-pipe last- although it is restrictive there are much more restrictive parts that require attention first.
Powerstation are very good but I'm not sure who maps for them. TSL are excellent at it, and are Prosport- Richard Bulmer does there mapping and he's one of the best, as is Bob Rawle. There are, however, some with, shall we say, 'lesser' reputations.
My MY03 did 349/347 after Richard mapped it (with supporting mods) and did about 20k on the same map and never missed a beat.
High EGT's are typically caused by lean running and are a symptom of increasing boost without sufficient fuelling; if you simply want to turn up the boost with an mbc then it can cause a problem. A properly written fuel map should reduce egt's.
Most people change the up-pipe last- although it is restrictive there are much more restrictive parts that require attention first.
Powerstation are very good but I'm not sure who maps for them. TSL are excellent at it, and are Prosport- Richard Bulmer does there mapping and he's one of the best, as is Bob Rawle. There are, however, some with, shall we say, 'lesser' reputations.
My MY03 did 349/347 after Richard mapped it (with supporting mods) and did about 20k on the same map and never missed a beat.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South East - "Keep Attacking The Ring"
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've never heard that its necessary to decat the up-pipe. The PPP certainly doesn't bother and the power ouput between that and the EcuTek is close enough to be within tolerances. Can someone please confirm this.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to add, the same car produced 297/301 a month before on the same rollers after 'another' mapper TEK'd it- exactly the same spec. Felt as flat as a witches t*t even though said mapper had three go's at it.
#25
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi RRH,
What are EGT's?
Also, what parts of the exhaust system would you recommend changing in prep for the ecutek?
I'm looking at a number of exhaust backboxes (nothing too large, probably a 3-4" like scoobysport/H&S, etc.), plus the fuel pump that Powerstation recommended. Do I need to change down pipe/centre pipe, etc?
I do have a budget so it's not a case of money-no-object, I'm taking a phased approach over the next 9-12 months (at least that's the plan ).
What are EGT's?
Also, what parts of the exhaust system would you recommend changing in prep for the ecutek?
I'm looking at a number of exhaust backboxes (nothing too large, probably a 3-4" like scoobysport/H&S, etc.), plus the fuel pump that Powerstation recommended. Do I need to change down pipe/centre pipe, etc?
I do have a budget so it's not a case of money-no-object, I'm taking a phased approach over the next 9-12 months (at least that's the plan ).
#26
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Isleworth, MSOC
Posts: 1,151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just quoting what Graham at TSL told me last week when I had a conversation with him re improving torque on my WRX PPP bugeye! These cars are restricted (up pipe and down pipe), and an ECU remap would be far more advantageous after improving the breathing of the engine, i.e, deristricting.
So many ways to extract extra torque/bhp!!
So many ways to extract extra torque/bhp!!
#27
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's what I'm finding - and more importantly, where to start!!!!
Thanks for the info.
Thanks for the info.
Originally Posted by GREGGYG
So many ways to extract extra torque/bhp!!
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ppp is a waste of time and money if you want to tune it. Once you have bought the Ecutek licence the map can be tweaked every time you change something.
I would change the backbox first, then either the two centre sections or the downpipe. Bear in mind that your choices will have a major affect on the noise level.
The fuel pump is always a good safety measure, and I would be inclined to fit an SX fuel regulator too- either get them from powerStation or speak to Mark Aigin at Lateral Performance.
EGT is exhaust gas temperature. I was the first one in the UK to use a Dawes device (manual boost controller) on a bugeye way back in 2000 or so. It did produce high EGT as there wasn't enough fuel to support the extra boost. There was a lot of talk at the time about the up-pipe cat disintegrating but I never came across one that failed, although I do agree that it could theoretically happen.
I have always changed the up-pipe for a de-cat, but it is a fair way down the list of mods I'd recommend if you're only tuning mildly. Will pop and bang like a bstard once the cats are removed, but they are bloody noisy!!!
I would change the backbox first, then either the two centre sections or the downpipe. Bear in mind that your choices will have a major affect on the noise level.
The fuel pump is always a good safety measure, and I would be inclined to fit an SX fuel regulator too- either get them from powerStation or speak to Mark Aigin at Lateral Performance.
EGT is exhaust gas temperature. I was the first one in the UK to use a Dawes device (manual boost controller) on a bugeye way back in 2000 or so. It did produce high EGT as there wasn't enough fuel to support the extra boost. There was a lot of talk at the time about the up-pipe cat disintegrating but I never came across one that failed, although I do agree that it could theoretically happen.
I have always changed the up-pipe for a de-cat, but it is a fair way down the list of mods I'd recommend if you're only tuning mildly. Will pop and bang like a bstard once the cats are removed, but they are bloody noisy!!!
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by GREGGYG
I was just quoting what Graham at TSL told me last week when I had a conversation with him re improving torque on my WRX PPP bugeye! These cars are restricted (up pipe and down pipe), and an ECU remap would be far more advantageous after improving the breathing of the engine, i.e, deristricting.
So many ways to extract extra torque/bhp!!
So many ways to extract extra torque/bhp!!
cheers,
simon
#30
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Surrounded by sheep, tidy.
Posts: 3,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok thanks.
Do you know the approximate cost of a fuel regulator?
Would you recommend getting the centre sections/downpipe done before the map, I guess if I have to pay for a remap if I change one of them a few months down the line it'll be more economical to do it now?
Any preference on which section to change first or is there equal benefit for each?
Rich.
Do you know the approximate cost of a fuel regulator?
Would you recommend getting the centre sections/downpipe done before the map, I guess if I have to pay for a remap if I change one of them a few months down the line it'll be more economical to do it now?
Any preference on which section to change first or is there equal benefit for each?
Rich.