Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How does 2003 JDM STI compare to 2005 UK STI PPP?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01 August 2005, 09:39 AM
  #1  
Stevie_h
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Stevie_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default How does 2003 JDM STI compare to 2005 UK STI PPP?

I drove a 2005(or is it 2004 - the one with the wider track and DCCD) STI PPP Type UK at the weekend and i was totally blown away by it (currently drive 2003 WRX PPP with Decat). The thing that struck me most was the handling. It was totally planted and DCCD really made it fun to drive.
However current funds wont stretch to a new STI so i was wondering is a 2003 JDM STi the same when it comes to handling? I know that substantial changes were made to the suspension of the 2005 STI Uk compared to the 2003 STI UK , but someone mentioned that it was just the same as a 2003 STI JDM. Can anyone comment?

Thanks

Steve
Old 01 August 2005, 10:42 AM
  #2  
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
ex-webby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

In my opinion the only thing that may be a very slight disadvantage is the lack of wider track and lack of the wider tyre on the 2003 JDM. I have a 2003 Spec C and that (as the other JDM MY03> STi's have) includes the DCCD-A as well.

If you don't mind the slightly harder ride of the Spec C (and I do mean slightly), than either the Spec C or a normal JDM STi is the one to go for. The engine is so much better than the UK equivalant and you get the better spec cars as well. It's win win tbh.

Some may prefer the "official" support with a UK model and if so, that is fine and as such a JDM model may not be an option.

Regards,
Shaun.
Old 02 August 2005, 08:17 AM
  #3  
Stevie_h
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Stevie_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by webmaster
In my opinion the only thing that may be a very slight disadvantage is the lack of wider track and lack of the wider tyre on the 2003 JDM. I have a 2003 Spec C and that (as the other JDM MY03> STi's have) includes the DCCD-A as well.

If you don't mind the slightly harder ride of the Spec C (and I do mean slightly), than either the Spec C or a normal JDM STi is the one to go for. The engine is so much better than the UK equivalant and you get the better spec cars as well. It's win win tbh.

Some may prefer the "official" support with a UK model and if so, that is fine and as such a JDM model may not be an option.

Regards,
Shaun.
Thanks Shaun, is the DCCD-A different from the DCCD found in the classics, or do i not know my acronyms? 80)
It also felt like the Uk spec had an Lsd on the rear, does the JDM have this too?

Thanks for your help,

Steve
Old 02 August 2005, 08:43 AM
  #4  
ex-webby
Orange Club
 
ex-webby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Posts: 13,763
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Steve,

The classic DCCD, did not have the "AUTO" feature of the later ones, hence the DCCD-"A" bit.

As far as I am aware the LSD is also on the JDM cars.

Regards,
Shaun.
Old 08 August 2005, 09:26 AM
  #5  
Stevie_h
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Stevie_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by webmaster
Steve,

The classic DCCD, did not have the "AUTO" feature of the later ones, hence the DCCD-"A" bit.

As far as I am aware the LSD is also on the JDM cars.

Regards,
Shaun.
Thanks Shaun,

Steve
Old 08 August 2005, 10:17 AM
  #6  
pippyrips
Scooby Regular
 
pippyrips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bebind the wheel of my red rice rocket
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'ver got a 04 JDM and as a package it's by fdar better than a uk spec. You get more for less money.
Old 08 August 2005, 03:04 PM
  #7  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Plus you get the benefit of quick rack steering and a twin srcoll turbo engine on the JDM car

Tony
Old 08 August 2005, 03:55 PM
  #8  
Stevie_h
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Stevie_h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It turns out that the 2005 sti suspension setup is based on the Spec-c, no wonder i thought it handled so well. So it seems a standard 2003 JDM sti might not be as good in terms of handling. Can anyone comment?

Ste h
Old 08 August 2005, 07:02 PM
  #9  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its not all the suspension thats based on the Spec C's, just the arms/bars etc which are thicker, the rest of the suspension has nothing in common with the Spec C which STILL has its own but you need to compare the 2 cars together, there will be a couple at LADS on sunday ( www.ladsoc.co.uk ) near haslingden (should be some directions there).

Tony
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
Danny0608
Subaru
6
27 September 2015 02:16 PM
Danny0608
Subaru Parts
0
12 September 2015 02:59 PM
Alex182
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
09 September 2015 09:32 AM



Quick Reply: How does 2003 JDM STI compare to 2005 UK STI PPP?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 AM.