SIMPLE QUESTION
18 January 2005, 09:07 PM
#5
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Notts
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MY04 is lighter than the MY05 then, unless the wagon is heavier which stands to reason.
Also 265 is PS not BHP
Did the sums recently to compare against the car I have :
MY98 Wagon with PPP 1270kg 250bhp 196.9bhp/ton
MY05 Wagon 1410kg 225ps=222bhp 157.4bhp/ton
MY05 Wagon with PPP 1410kg 265ps=261bhp 185.4bhp/ton
Also 265 is PS not BHP
Did the sums recently to compare against the car I have :
MY98 Wagon with PPP 1270kg 250bhp 196.9bhp/ton
MY05 Wagon 1410kg 225ps=222bhp 157.4bhp/ton
MY05 Wagon with PPP 1410kg 265ps=261bhp 185.4bhp/ton
18 January 2005, 09:14 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
did mine as well :
337/1.24 = 272bhp/ton
or to put it another way about the same power to weight as a 400bhp MY04 STi
337/1.24 = 272bhp/ton
or to put it another way about the same power to weight as a 400bhp MY04 STi
Last edited by chrisp; 18 January 2005 at 09:19 PM.
Trending Topics
19 January 2005, 07:55 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Beds
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
crisp, is your weight including
bigger wheels
fatter tyres
Stereo ,amp & sub
added mechanical modifications
etc etc
Not to say that you do or anything, but would imagine if someone did there would be a significant difference ?
personally i dont (but used to !)
bigger wheels
fatter tyres
Stereo ,amp & sub
added mechanical modifications
etc etc
Not to say that you do or anything, but would imagine if someone did there would be a significant difference ?
personally i dont (but used to !)
19 January 2005, 08:06 PM
#10
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Notts
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wouldn't have though any significant gains would have been made with the drive train efficiency.
the delivery is certainly different from classic to new age though, mapping is different, new age power delivery is much smoother as opposed to the slam in the back you get when a classic comes on boost. Suppose if you remapped though you could get the same delivery style in a newage but not sure.
the delivery is certainly different from classic to new age though, mapping is different, new age power delivery is much smoother as opposed to the slam in the back you get when a classic comes on boost. Suppose if you remapped though you could get the same delivery style in a newage but not sure.
19 January 2005, 09:00 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by virgin
crisp, is your weight including
bigger wheels
fatter tyres
Stereo ,amp & sub
added mechanical modifications
etc etc
Not to say that you do or anything, but would imagine if someone did there would be a significant difference ?
personally i dont (but used to !)
bigger wheels
fatter tyres
Stereo ,amp & sub
added mechanical modifications
etc etc
Not to say that you do or anything, but would imagine if someone did there would be a significant difference ?
personally i dont (but used to !)
I changed my 16" for 18" speedline lites they are slightly heavier
I have a double din stereo but no sub
turbo back stainless zorst which maybe lighter as the silencer is smaller
Only really increase maybe the spoiler change from a 4 to a 6 but nothing major
oh and security install
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM
Phil3822
General Technical
0
30 September 2015 06:29 PM