Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

why do uk cars have less power?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 October 2003, 10:39 PM
  #1  
hoskib
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
hoskib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: gravesend, kent
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

really need to get out more,but i was wondering why the massive difference between the wrx and turbo 2000? guessing the engine and management have to cope with the lower octane fuel,but if that is the case why has the P1 got the same bhp as the stiV5(?) it's based on even after it has been played with to suit this country?
any thoughts at all?
cheers
Old 16 October 2003, 10:50 PM
  #2  
wanted
Scooby Regular
 
wanted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 862
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

So you can spend more money moding them
Old 16 October 2003, 10:51 PM
  #3  
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Turbohot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

LOL!
Old 17 October 2003, 01:04 AM
  #4  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

i was wondering why the massive difference between the wrx and turbo 2000?
Partly a marketing decision, and partly a reflection of the fact that Japanese road conditions are different, and that we have lower quality pump fuel.

guessing the engine and management have to cope with the lower octane fuel,
Correct in large part.

but if that is the case why has the P1 got the same bhp as the stiV5(?)
It hasn't. An STi5 running on 100RON fuel would in practice produce noticeably more power than a P1 running Opti, despite what the figures may say.

Cars can't legally be sold in Japan with outputs greater than 280ps (276bhp), so the manufacturers with cars that produce more power than that just lie on the official spec sheets. A standard STi5 Type R produces in excess of 290bhp on proper fuel.

While the P1 has the same fuel map, the knock correction is considerably more active, so under real-world conditions, there'd be an immediately noticeable power difference between an STi5 on Jap fuel and a P1 on Opti, even if you forgot about all the other differences like gearing, weight and so-on.
Old 17 October 2003, 01:27 AM
  #5  
MISS SCOOBY STI
Scooby Regular
 
MISS SCOOBY STI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Highlands
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool


"A standard STi5 Type R produces in excess of 290bhp on proper fuel."

Heyhey, u just made my day!!! I've got a 1998 Type R STI, but only had less than 3 months, & since I seem to be followed everywhere by my fans with the strange coloured go faster stripes on their vehicles, I've obviously been a good girl . Been to the 1/4 mile strip though so I know it's f@#king fast!!!
What exactly do u mean by "proper fuel" though? (we only have one place selling Optimax here & that's only been open a month!, so not very knowledgeable about that stuff)

[Edited by MISS SCOOBY STI - 10/17/2003 1:31:08 AM]
Old 17 October 2003, 02:06 PM
  #6  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Even more amazing is the fact that the US cars have the same power rating as us (in some cases more, i think their STI has 300 standard) yet they run them on 91 Octane fuel (and thats their PREMIUM!!)

I have no idea how they get the figures, might as well run it on cooking oil...
Old 17 October 2003, 02:07 PM
  #7  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Whoops double post!

[Edited by Neilo - 10/17/2003 2:07:48 PM]
Old 17 October 2003, 02:42 PM
  #8  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What exactly do u mean by "proper fuel" though? (we only have one place selling Optimax here & that's only been open a month!, so not very knowledgeable about that stuff)
I mean Japanese market fuel - what these engines were designed to run on. Don't want to scare you unduly, but these cars have a nasty habit of going bang if run on our fuel, so you need to do something about it sooner rather than later.

Running on "normal" UK unleaded is a quick route to disaster, so just don't. Either get it remapped for UK Opti/Super, or use Optimax plus the correct amount of good (i.e. NF) octane booster. Fitting a KnockLink is also strongly recommended.

BTW, Neilo, although the figures for USDM and UK appear to indicate the same power levels, there have been a number of reports from people who've driven cars in the 'States that they're not in fact as quick as what we have. Thus it would seem that the figures alone again don't tell the full story.

[Edited by greasemonkey - 10/17/2003 2:44:36 PM]
Old 17 October 2003, 02:52 PM
  #9  
Gridlock Mikey
Scooby Regular
 
Gridlock Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: http://www.facebook.com
Posts: 15,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Red face

Running on "normal" UK unleaded is a quick route to disaster, so just don't.
greasemonkey You're not normally one to come out with mad scare mongery type statements of that magnitude
I thought scoobynet had moved away from these sweeping statements.
I'm sure we all know of people with imports that run their cars on "normal" unleaded a few mods etc and the cars are fine, just not ragged around 24/7.
The higher octane fuel may help to look after the engine but just cos you don't use it doesn't mean that you are going to have a disaster
Wise words monkey, just a tad heavy handed I feel

Mikey
Old 17 October 2003, 03:00 PM
  #10  
Neilo
Scooby Regular
 
Neilo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Greasemonkey, fair do's, its just that i was in the states the other week and the impreza ad came on TV, claiming 0-60 in 5.4 and whatnot....

I cant believe that they would be anywhere near what we have though running on chip fat.
Old 17 October 2003, 03:27 PM
  #11  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

greasemonkey You're not normally one to come out with mad scare mongery type statements of that magnitude
Indeed I don't. If I do then, there's probably a good reason. I read Miss Scooby's post that as there was only one Opti garage in her area, she'd been using "something else" (not necessarily SUL), hence the wording of my response.

I'm sure we all know of people with imports that run their cars on "normal" unleaded a few mods etc and the cars are fine, just not ragged around 24/7.
I'm sure we do, but that's a bit like saying you've smoked for 40 years and don't have lung cancer. We also know of several cars that have blown up expensively as a result of being run on incorrect fuel. BTW, you don't necessarily have to "rag" a det-prone car to bring it on. Just running tall can do it.

I'd much rather scare someone into running Opti plus booster than understate the urgency of the situation and see them posting about a melted engine. Don't forget we've had people blow engines on the way home from picking up their new car after filling it with "Premium" unleaded! While it could well be that the car was already knackered, tempting fate by running on the wrong fuel is not the best way to proceed.

The higher octane fuel may help to look after the engine but just cos you don't use it doesn't mean that you are going to have a disaster
It means you are much more likely to have a disaster. The Japanese ECU's simply don't have sufficient knock correction built into them to protect the engine adequately when run on UK "supermarket" fuel.

The STi 5 is far too close to the limit for comfort in these circumstances, hence the urgency of my previous post.

[Edited by greasemonkey - 10/17/2003 3:37:53 PM]
Old 17 October 2003, 04:03 PM
  #12  
Gridlock Mikey
Scooby Regular
 
Gridlock Mikey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: http://www.facebook.com
Posts: 15,233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Like I said grease, it's not that what you said was incorrect, it was how it was said. If the thread wasn't for the benefit of a newbie, then it wouldn't have alarmed me.
This person is now gonna be driving the next few miles until they get optimax/ob/knocklinks etc , worrying that their scoob is about to fail. Paranoid about every surge and pop and rumble. They don't need to be if they are driving normally.
I think I would have phrased your response something like:
" In my experience, the car is more prone to detonation (See Search) the lower the grade of fuel that you use. Personally I like the security of using x,y and z as it reduces the chances of damage"
Enough info there, doesn't scare anyone and also shows newbies where to get information for them to make up thier own minds.
I do get a bee in my bonnet about this sort of thing because I shat myself for the first 3 months of scoob ownership, paranoid because I had no choice but to believe and absorb everything on SN. I then learnt that not every scoob has engine failiure when not wrapped in cotton wool!
Anyways, no offence intended, just saying me bit

Mikey <MY00 UK Decat ITG Dawes NO Knocklink 58,000 miles >
Old 17 October 2003, 04:08 PM
  #13  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Post

I cant believe that they would be anywhere near what we have though running on chip fat.
They dont run chip fat fuel in the USA. The octane numbers in the USA are based on PON values (MON+RON/2) so you cant compare values. Premium in the USA is 93PON, which is the equivilant to 97RON.

The USDM STi is faster than a UK spec STi, by quite some margin. It's a much better car and has the DCCD-A transmition plus BBS magnesium wheels, it's very similar to a spec C, but has a torquey 2.5T engine. It costs £19K too!
Old 17 October 2003, 04:25 PM
  #14  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Post

You should never run a Japanese spec STi on 95RON. 97RON is fine for just tootling around, but if you are going to be loading it up, even for short bursts you need optimax. If you decat An STi or use it very hard, then you need to add booster to SUL/Optimax unless you have it remapped.

It means you are much more likely to have a disaster. The Japanese ECU's simply don't have sufficient knock correction built into them to protect the engine adequately when run on UK "supermarket" fuel.
you will find the STi5 and P1 have identical knock correction/ignition maps. The P1 has a more active knock correction though, as the STi has its knock sensitivity reduced to allow it to produce more power on 100RON fuel.

Unlike a UK Turbo, the P1 and STi5 have efectively one base set of ignition maps, a UK turbo has a diferent map that it switches to when it detects you have a low octane 95RON fuel in the car, because of this you should never use anything but SUL or better in a P1 IMHO.

If you decat a P1 you must get it remapped to be sure it is safe, as unmapped decated STi5/6/P1's produce big det spikes which could kill your engine. These particular cars also have a rather sensitive MAF sensor (all MY99/00 do) so if you install an aftermarket cone filter or oiled panel filter you are going to kill the MAF sensor, which will leave you with a lean mixture, which again can kill the engine.

Like most things on these cars, do your homework and use quality fuel, maintanance routines and you wont have a problem, start playing with them and using poor fuel and you are increasing your risks significantly.



Old 17 October 2003, 04:30 PM
  #15  
sti-spec-a
Scooby Regular
 
sti-spec-a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: glasgow
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

jdm cars r quicker than uk lots of components r diffrent open the bonnet of a uk turbo 2000 twice the weight of a jdm wrx Suspension components r alloy on jdm Final drive is UK 3.6 JDM WRX 3.9 or 4.1 JDM WRX RA 4.4 As for the engines blowing my belief is its the fuel pump It can supply enough pressure at high rpm it finds it difficult to supply the actual volume of fuel required To remedy this i thoroughly recomend fitting an uprated fuel pump about 180 pounds jdm cars have the 180 kmh limiter on them so they r intended as "blast up through the gears" not flat at 160
Old 17 October 2003, 05:42 PM
  #16  
hoskib
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
hoskib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: gravesend, kent
Posts: 4,721
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

johnfelstead,

got me worried talking about oiled panel filters killing your MAF/car,i've had an itg panel in my car (MY99) for a couple of years now, should i change it for a drier panel? if so can you guys recommend one? bit of a **** cos i bought the panel after being told i could put it in and forget about it (i have it out to remove the crap off it every now and again but its still gloopy as hell) am i driving a ticking time bomb or is it not that bad?
cheers
Old 17 October 2003, 05:49 PM
  #17  
johnfelstead
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
johnfelstead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 11,439
Received 53 Likes on 30 Posts
Post

I would not use an oiled filter on an MY99/00 car, the MAF's are too fragile. The problem with MAF failures is its a gradual decline in performance, so you dont always notice them going.

You can use an OEM filter from an STi5, available via scoobymania, these flow enough air for at least 320BHP and filter properly.

New MAF's cost around £75, i would either get it checked with a select monitor/Delta Dash by a competent subaru specialist or just put a new one in and swap the filter.
Old 19 October 2003, 05:18 PM
  #18  
martyrobertsdj
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
martyrobertsdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: York-ish
Posts: 1,707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Things to consider when looking at US cars 0-60 times and power outputs....

I think US miles are a bit shorter than UK miles

and

Each US BHP is a bit less than a UK one, so for example 290 US BHP might be 280 UK BHP

Please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong!!

Marty
Old 19 October 2003, 05:36 PM
  #19  
Boro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Boro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Do you think there are to0 many QUOTES being used on this thread?
Yes, i do


[Edited by Boro - 10/19/2003 5:37:12 PM]
Old 19 October 2003, 05:55 PM
  #20  
BOB.T
Scooby Senior
 
BOB.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Radiator Springs
Posts: 14,810
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

actually no, I like it when folk use quotes, it's easier to understand what they're talking about!
Old 27 October 2003, 12:48 PM
  #21  
Jza
Scooby Regular
 
Jza's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,959
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

97RON is fine for just tootling around, but if you are going to be loading it up, even for short bursts you need optimax. If you decat An STi or use it very hard, then you need to add booster to SUL/Optimax unless you have it remapped.
And when you do, and you change your oil religiously, warm the car up properly - ensure everything is tip top.... they still blow up don't they John

Fact is - even with all the precautions in the world - if its going to go pop its going to go pop isn't it

Jza
Old 27 October 2003, 12:58 PM
  #22  
Wilster
Scooby Regular
 
Wilster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Its probably more closely related to how hard the thing is driven
Old 27 October 2003, 01:04 PM
  #23  
Nezz10
Scooby Regular
 
Nezz10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Post

Arent the Jap engines different internally as well? The guys at Powerstation said mine produced good power for a UK cause it has hydraulic lifters (whats that?).
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Iqy7861
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
22
12 October 2015 09:21 AM
blockhead
Subaru Parts
7
25 September 2015 08:33 AM
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
23 September 2015 09:11 AM
ossett2k2
General Technical
9
13 September 2015 09:35 AM
alcazar
Other Marques
9
09 September 2015 05:42 PM



Quick Reply: why do uk cars have less power?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 PM.