Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Help Required !!!!!!!!!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2001 | 09:28 PM
  #1  
wheelwright's Avatar
wheelwright
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 15,507
Likes: 0
From: Birmingham
Question

Recently stayed at a well know holiday centre and the rear of my car was hit and damaged by a large four seater hire cycle.The cycles are owned by the centre and hired out to holiday makers just to ride around the site.
The holiday centre say its not their problem and will not pay the £300 to replace the rear bumper as the car is parked on their site at your own risk.
Could anyone tell me if this is correct or will i be able to get the money off them??As i'm sure they must have some sort of cover for accidents like this.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2001 | 09:31 PM
  #2  
JGRIFF's Avatar
JGRIFF
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 945
Likes: 0
Angry

It's called Public Liability Insurance, get your insurers to press them, they will cave in eventually
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2001 | 10:16 PM
  #3  
IggDawg's Avatar
IggDawg
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Post

I dunno how it is over there, but over here if it says "park at your own risk," thats it. Sometimes you can get them on gross neglegence, but unless you're going to go fullbore its probably going to cost you more than its worth. especially if you end up losing.

-Igg
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2001 | 09:44 AM
  #4  
blp's Avatar
blp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 1999
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Post

A new law was passed beginning of this year which stated that you could claim on insurance even though it was private land, where as before, private land meant no one could claim. I read it in the Advanced Motorists News Letter. Drop me a line if you need a copy of the article. You should be able to claim I reckon.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2001 | 09:54 AM
  #5  
Josh L's Avatar
Josh L
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 2,352
Likes: 0
Post

A couple of years ago, I had cause to sue a company who were using a similar clause to avoid payment for damage (not my car). When it got to the small claims court, the Judge basically said that the clause was not worth the paper it was written on.

Such 'catch all' clauses are commonly found to be unfair, hence invalid, as taken to extremes could almost imply that if the staff wanted to practice their football skills on the side of your car then 'tough, you parked at your own risk'. I can't see how they would not have some sort of Duty of Care.

If you insurance won't press them, take them to the small claims court.

Josh
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Abx
Subaru
22
Jan 9, 2016 05:42 PM
gazzawrx
Non Car Related Items For sale
13
Oct 17, 2015 06:51 PM
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
Oct 4, 2015 09:49 PM
buckerz69
Wanted
2
Oct 3, 2015 09:54 PM
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
Sep 29, 2015 07:36 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:52 PM.