Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

2.5 vs 2.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 27, 2017 | 11:00 PM
  #1  
Wayno5's Avatar
Wayno5
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Adelaide
Default 2.5 vs 2.0

Hello all
I am a new member seeking info.
Used to own the Bugeye 2000 WRX and loved it.
I am now looking at buying a 2012-2013 2.5 litre WRX.
Have heard issues with Piston problems regarding Ringland which
can cause heaps of damage.
Can any owners put me on the straight and narrow.
Should i be concerned about buying one of these great cards or not.

Thanks from Wayne in Adelaide.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 02:47 AM
  #2  
NGBZ's Avatar
NGBZ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, NZ
Default

They can be problematic if not serviced properly or modded by someone who does not know what they are doing. At the end of they day, the 2.5 is a decent motor if treated with respect.
Get one with a known service history and no mods and you'll more likely to have no issues.
There are a lot of misconceptions out there but didn't put me off getting a 2016 STi.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 06:01 AM
  #3  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

You're a braver man than me.

Yep the world sure is full of misconceptions but the Subaru 2.5L engine ain't one of em!

Fill your boots Wayno...

https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...-failures.html
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 07:59 AM
  #4  
Matty81's Avatar
Matty81
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,768
Likes: 19
From: Banned
Default

As what ngbz said. Great cars when they are serviced properly. some 2.5's are bad some are good. Aslong as you treat them with respect you should be alright. Sti 2.5's seem to go more than the wrx's, but I think that's because the wrx piston compression is different to the sti.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 08:16 AM
  #5  
clyne 08's Avatar
clyne 08
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 377
Likes: 3
From: Hartlepool
Default

Just buy one which has been forged already, as a lot have! this will save you money and tears down the line.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 08:36 AM
  #6  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

the 2.5 is a great engine when built right, problem is they weren't. In standard form they have a habbit of breaking ring lands and blowing headgaskets (make rovers look reliable).

It's pure pot luck whether they go or not, i've seen high mileage cars treated like crap still going strong and i've seen low milage well looked after cars fail under 10k miles, it's just how lucky/unlucky you are rather than how well looked after or anything else.

Once they have a bit of love, decent rods, pistons and head studs they will be very reliable even at 450bhp and make a cracking road engine. Even to the point of i have had a forged, closed deck one put in my type R with the goal of running it between 500 and 550
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 09:26 AM
  #7  
domino46's Avatar
domino46
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,179
Likes: 265
From: www.bbscoobys.com
Default

properly forged they are a great engine with endless torque and I prefer it to the 2.0 , mines currently 530bhp
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 10:32 AM
  #8  
Blue by You's Avatar
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
From: In the fast lane
Default

Originally Posted by domino46
properly forged they are a great engine with endless torque and I prefer it to the 2.0 , mines currently 530bhp
Have to agree with this.
The torque from a built 2.5 is endless. I wouldn't trust a standard one, but if you can find a car with a properly forged 2.5 you won't be sorry.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 10:48 AM
  #9  
ossett2k2's Avatar
ossett2k2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 39
From: Leeds
Default

A bit of a thread hijack here but do 2.0ltr heads fit straight on to a 2.5ltr block or is there more to it?
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 10:50 AM
  #10  
Gambit's Avatar
Gambit
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,419
Likes: 282
From: Belfast
Default

its the 2.5STI which is more prone to breaking. 2.5 WRX isnt as problematic
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 11:04 AM
  #11  
SmurfyBhoy's Avatar
SmurfyBhoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,280
Likes: 79
From: Glasgow
Default

Originally Posted by ossett2k2
A bit of a thread hijack here but do 2.0ltr heads fit straight on to a 2.5ltr block or is there more to it?
" I Think" that machining is required as different chambers ,
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 11:35 AM
  #12  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

I'm running v5 heads on a 2.5 block, It had to have a load of machine work to sort out valve seats, valve guides etc, but I'm not aware of it needing any work specifically to fit. Doesn't mean there wasn't i should add, i'll ask.

Does work well as a combination though,

Name:  GT2871r%20Graph%20-%20Edit_zpswkyjemds.jpg
Views: 0
Size:  229.1 KB

Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 11:48 AM
  #13  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

You can fit them straight on if you want, but better if you open up the combustion chamber to match the larger pistons.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 11:58 AM
  #14  
ossett2k2's Avatar
ossett2k2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,433
Likes: 39
From: Leeds
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
I'm running v5 heads on a 2.5 block, It had to have a load of machine work to sort out valve seats, valve guides etc, but I'm not aware of it needing any work specifically to fit. Doesn't mean there wasn't i should add, i'll ask.

Does work well as a combination though,



Love this graph,you must have strong neck muscles to drive that car

Originally Posted by banny sti
You can fit them straight on if you want, but better if you open up the combustion chamber to match the larger pistons.
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2017 | 12:09 PM
  #15  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by ossett2k2
Love this graph,you must have strong neck muscles to drive that car



haha

i want more though, in theory if i hit 500bhp its gonna be knocking on 600ftlb if it goes up the same way it has at previous stages.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2017 | 06:02 PM
  #16  
Gav81's Avatar
Gav81
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default Worries now

im buying a 2007 STI Hawkeye 68,000 on clock should I be worried regards some comments with the engine?
Cheers newbie gav
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2017 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Originally Posted by Gav81
im buying a 2007 STI Hawkeye 68,000 on clock should I be worried regards some comments with the engine?
Cheers newbie gav
When I bought mine I was fully aware of the issues and went with it, you might get lucky

But, and this has to be taken into account, how easy will it be to sell when the time comes? When running well the 2.5 is an awesome engine
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2017 | 08:48 PM
  #18  
Gav81's Avatar
Gav81
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
When I bought mine I was fully aware of the issues and went with it, you might get lucky

But, and this has to be taken into account, how easy will it be to sell when the time comes? When running well the 2.5 is an awesome engine
Im hoping to be keeping it for a good while do some bits to it and treat it well,
what would you suggest to do to help prevent having to have a engine rebuild at some point? That isn't going to soar the earth now
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2017 | 09:20 PM
  #19  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Originally Posted by Gav81
Im hoping to be keeping it for a good while do some bits to it and treat it well,
what would you suggest to do to help prevent having to have a engine rebuild at some point? That isn't going to soar the earth now
Stay off boost seriously just service regularly and enjoy the car, some 2.5's have gone over 100k miles with no problems, however, you must be prepared for the worst.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2017 | 10:05 PM
  #20  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

As above. It's pure pot luck. Seen some abused and never go, seen some babied and go in very short order.

Bear in mind it's cheaper to sort it rather than fix it, so could always budget for a rebuild when you buy and have it done straight away.
Reply
Old Mar 30, 2017 | 10:41 PM
  #21  
big-kev's Avatar
big-kev
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 497
Likes: 6
From: belfast
Default

Drive it until it breaks ! that's if it ever does break and then worry about a rebuild
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2017 | 05:35 AM
  #22  
Gav81's Avatar
Gav81
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Won't be able to stay of the boost lol like it to much, I will just drive it till or if it does go bang not point worrying now I guess a put a big deposit down so I can't back out now otherwise I will lose it,
cheers for the advice guys

Last edited by Gav81; Mar 31, 2017 at 05:37 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 31, 2017 | 08:31 AM
  #23  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Pics, how much?
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 12:32 AM
  #24  
Vxr2010's Avatar
Vxr2010
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 298
From: Herts
Default

not all 2.5 break , luck of the draw plus good servicing and sensible warm up , of heads go do a full rebuild as bottom end very likely to go with in a year or so , on the 2 litre the bottom ends tend not to fail as much after a rebuild
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 11:09 AM
  #25  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by Vxr2010
not all 2.5 break , luck of the draw plus good servicing and sensible warm up , of heads go do a full rebuild as bottom end very likely to go with in a year or so , on the 2 litre the bottom ends tend not to fail as much after a rebuild
Most 2.0's are getting on in miles now, so since your 75% of the way there may as well do them.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 02:03 PM
  #26  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Wishful thinking is that 2.5 failures are due to poor mods or servicing by others. Until it happens to you.

Strikes me that the EJ257 was a cheaply adapted design from a normally aspirated engine, forced on them for emissions reasons for their target output.

A lot of failures in the aftermarket that were supposed to have been done properly never reached the public domain.

Last edited by john banks; Apr 1, 2017 at 02:05 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 1, 2017 | 02:44 PM
  #27  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
Wishful thinking is that 2.5 failures are due to poor mods or servicing by others. Until it happens to you.

Strikes me that the EJ257 was a cheaply adapted design from a normally aspirated engine, forced on them for emissions reasons for their target output.

A lot of failures in the aftermarket that were supposed to have been done properly never reached the public domain.
you could point to alot fo reasons, no longer use forged pistons, inferior head gaskets, poor map etc etc. If it was one thing that was easy to identify then would be alot easier to sort.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 07:17 AM
  #28  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

I had a 2.5 with a MD321T, it was stupidly fast but ultimately unreliable unless carefully mapped. It failed the last time whilst it went to a third party mapper up in Carnforth-he paid me out !

My engine builder was also steering away from 2.5 blocks for big power and recommending 2 litre (ideally CDB) with a stroker kit to make 2.1

Do people still modify Subaru anymore? Mine went years ago and wont buy another, I just see the odd older and older rust buckets around these days

Last edited by andy97; Apr 4, 2017 at 07:21 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 09:39 AM
  #29  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
I had a 2.5 with a MD321T, it was stupidly fast but ultimately unreliable unless carefully mapped. It failed the last time whilst it went to a third party mapper up in Carnforth-he paid me out !

My engine builder was also steering away from 2.5 blocks for big power and recommending 2 litre (ideally CDB) with a stroker kit to make 2.1

Do people still modify Subaru anymore? Mine went years ago and wont buy another, I just see the odd older and older rust buckets around these days
define big power. 2.5 closed deck converted will do 550 reliably, beyond that then you need to look at the whole engine package anyway.
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2017 | 09:58 AM
  #30  
Vxr2010's Avatar
Vxr2010
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,428
Likes: 298
From: Herts
Default

a 2.5 with a sensible map about 1.3 bar boost and forged is a good lump , plus slow warm up and regular service , the torque is much greater than the 2 litre , and cars are a lot more driveable , use arp or like head bolts or the hg issue can return more easily , 2 litres are stronger but lack the torque , a 2 litre stroked engine could be best of both worlds but i don't know if there are downsides of stroking them ?
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:02 PM.