Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Scooby VS Evo...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 01:09 PM
  #1  
AdamGethin1's Avatar
AdamGethin1
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Pembrokeshire
Default Scooby VS Evo...

Hi gents,

Thought this might be an interesting topic to discuss...

Have you experienced an evo (if so, which one) and how does it compare to your experiences with the fabled Impreza (again, which one)?

I'll handle this delicately as I'm aware this is like walking into the blue half of Manchester wearing a red jersey .
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 01:13 PM
  #2  
jaygsi's Avatar
jaygsi
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,530
Likes: 258
From: uk
Default

Never been in one, but always liked them. But couldn't live without my burble.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 03:16 PM
  #3  
Henrik's Avatar
Henrik
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 151
From: London
Default

I've had a scooby since 2003 (currently broken), and I used to daily drive an evo 7rs (mainly for school run). The evo was in fantastic condition (direct import from japan).

the evo felt more competent than the subaru. It had less understeer on track, better steering response, far better torque etc etc.

I got rid of the evo as although it was technically a brilliant car, it just felt a bit lifeless and boring to me.

I was not sad to see it go, to be honest.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 03:23 PM
  #4  
sti-chris's Avatar
sti-chris
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 606
Likes: 2
From: united kingdom
Default

Owned an Evo 8 for 4 years, car was running 400/400 and was simple to tune.
Handling was absolutely fantastic , power delivery was not as aggressive as the Subaru but it did pull 2 bar of boost right to the red line.

Fuel consumption was shocking and they don't seem to fair well against rot and rust.
Sold it for more that I paid for it which was a bit crazy so they seem to hold money well.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 03:25 PM
  #5  
Moley's Avatar
Moley
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Likes: 30
Default

I had Subaru's for 10 years and have owned an Evo 6 for the last 2.5 years.

The Evo is the better car out the box, but with a few simple mods the Impreza can be just as good on road.

On track a few small mods makes the Evo very very impressive, the Subaru would need a lot more mods to be as good.

However, i agree with Henrik, the Evo lacks that special 'something' that you get with the Impreza.

If i had the choice of any i'd be a STI Type R.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 03:29 PM
  #6  
RAGGY DOO's Avatar
RAGGY DOO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 108
From: the rebel county
Default

I had a 2 and a 3 good friends of mine have had 4 7 and 8
The only Subaru I would own over the above is my jdm hatch
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 03:41 PM
  #7  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

evo 6,7, 8 and a 10 out of the box and basic mods they are a fantastic car, sound like any other 4 pot inline turbo car and a better weekend car than an impreza.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 04:01 PM
  #8  
Rusti's Avatar
Rusti
Scooby Regular
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,629
Likes: 163
From: Hampshire
Default

Originally Posted by Moley
I had Subaru's for 10 years and have owned an Evo 6 for the last 2.5 years.

The Evo is the better car out the box, but with a few simple mods the Impreza can be just as good on road.

On track a few small mods makes the Evo very very impressive, the Subaru would need a lot more mods to be as good.

However, i agree with Henrik, the Evo lacks that special 'something' that you get with the Impreza.

If i had the choice of any i'd be a STI Type R.
What simple mods would you be referring to buddy?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 04:09 PM
  #9  
Moley's Avatar
Moley
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Likes: 30
Default

Originally Posted by Rusti
What simple mods would you be referring to buddy?
Whiteline rear ARB, drop links and anti-lift kit. Makes the handling much sharper and dials out the understeer.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 04:58 PM
  #10  
jayallen's Avatar
jayallen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,899
Likes: 0
From: The Fabulist Hunter
Default

Had my fair share Imprezas including 2 RA's, Blob STI and a Bug STI running over 400bhp but my Evo 5 is head and shoulders above all of the above in terms of power delivery and handling and I tracked them all.

I've never felt that the Evo feels lifeless, far from it, it's just slightly different.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 05:42 PM
  #11  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Drove the Evo 4 rally art version, great car but found it a bit 'I want to bite your face off' aggressive

Scooby is much better to live with on a day to day basis
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 06:15 PM
  #12  
AdamGethin1's Avatar
AdamGethin1
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Pembrokeshire
Default

Extremely interesting reading - I've always got the impression the general consensus is Evo's are "better/quicker" but people love the Subaru's more... I do love the flat four burble
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 06:47 PM
  #13  
RAGGY DOO's Avatar
RAGGY DOO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 3,000
Likes: 108
From: the rebel county
Default

I think as an overall package the evo was always the superior car in every dept pound for pound
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 08:48 PM
  #14  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Problem when these comparisons is historically the EVO has always cost more than the Impreza or at least the UK variants... few years back there was almost a £10k price difference, so realistically you need to be comparing Evo's against Spec C RA's or S 202/3/4's etc.... not really against your standard UK STI's.

For the price difference you'd expect the Evo to be better.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2017 | 09:24 PM
  #15  
Henrik's Avatar
Henrik
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 151
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Problem when these comparisons is historically the EVO has always cost more than the Impreza or at least the UK variants... few years back there was almost a £10k price difference, so realistically you need to be comparing Evo's against Spec C RA's or S 202/3/4's etc.... not really against your standard UK STI's.

For the price difference you'd expect the Evo to be better.
This is very true, and I think if we're looking at the two cars objectively and honestly, the Evo is 'better', but at least for me it just didn't float my boat in the same way the impreza does
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2017 | 01:51 AM
  #16  
Dblock's Avatar
Dblock
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Default

I will have an evo 8 one day. I love my subie but I love evos too. They are both iconic IMO.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2017 | 03:03 AM
  #17  
NGBZ's Avatar
NGBZ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
From: Auckland, NZ
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Problem when these comparisons is historically the EVO has always cost more than the Impreza or at least the UK variants... few years back there was almost a £10k price difference, so realistically you need to be comparing Evo's against Spec C RA's or S 202/3/4's etc.... not really against your standard UK STI's.

For the price difference you'd expect the Evo to be better.
When I was looking at new cars last year, the X was on my potential list but was considerably more than even a Premium spec STi which I ended up buying. Much prefered the 'raw' driving experience plus the bonus of a 6 speed box (and a better quality interior).
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2017 | 01:14 PM
  #18  
EddScott's Avatar
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,575
Likes: 65
From: West Wales
Default

Originally Posted by 53
^ this

My standard S202 mapped for UK fuel with suspension mods vs 360bhp modified EVO7 and the independent result was a draw.
I read that last night. An interesting read.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2017 | 04:40 PM
  #19  
JamieJerkovic's Avatar
JamieJerkovic
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Cheltenham
Default

I went from a hatch sti to evo 9 gt.. 2 tottally different cars. The hatch was alot better as a daily drive and with the forged 2.5 running 440bhp the torque was something else. But in my opinion you cannot beat the 9 gt for rawness, just feels like a go kart! Would be interesting with a few mods and a remap. Running costs are pretty much the same depending how you drive it.

If you havent tried an evo i certainly would, in an ideal world i would have one of each.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 06:51 AM
  #20  
ryan51's Avatar
ryan51
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: Norwich
Default

Originally Posted by JamieJerkovic
I went from a hatch sti to evo 9 gt.. 2 tottally different cars. The hatch was alot better as a daily drive and with the forged 2.5 running 440bhp the torque was something else. But in my opinion you cannot beat the 9 gt for rawness, just feels like a go kart! Would be interesting with a few mods and a remap. Running costs are pretty much the same depending how you drive it.

If you havent tried an evo i certainly would, in an ideal world i would have one of each.
Hello mate how's it going?all good i hope.any pictures of this evo then?
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 07:42 AM
  #21  
JamieJerkovic's Avatar
JamieJerkovic
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
From: Cheltenham
Default

Hello mate, yes good thanks yourself? Still on the scooby scene then haha.

Yes mate ill pop some up this evening!

Last edited by JamieJerkovic; Feb 9, 2017 at 07:45 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 07:59 AM
  #22  
Wull's Avatar
Wull
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 943
Likes: 0
From: Killin
Default

Originally Posted by 53
^ this

My standard S202 mapped for UK fuel with suspension mods vs 360bhp modified EVO7 and the independent result was a draw.

Love Evos love Subarus







Interesting reading, I presume he meant to put "BUGEYE" and not "BLOBEYE".....?

It's always going to be horses for courses and TBH the differences when on track are negligible dependant on modifications of course.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 10:34 AM
  #23  
Ben_r1's Avatar
Ben_r1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 52
Likes: 6
From: Essex
Default

I've had both for the past few years. Evo 9 MR FQ360 vs a Blobeye Sti PPP.

Obviously the Evo is a higher spec so unfair to directly compare them but ultimately the Evo is more capable, having said that it does not justify the extra cost over the Scooby.

I'd be just as happy in either on a good road to be honest.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 11:04 AM
  #24  
scooby k's Avatar
scooby k
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Ben_r1
I've had both for the past few years. Evo 9 MR FQ360 vs a Blobeye Sti PPP.

Obviously the Evo is a higher spec so unfair to directly compare them but ultimately the Evo is more capable, having said that it does not justify the extra cost over the Scooby.

I'd be just as happy in either on a good road to be honest.

would you say the evo is more better in traffic as doesn't have the burble sound.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 01:21 PM
  #25  
Ben_r1's Avatar
Ben_r1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 52
Likes: 6
From: Essex
Default

Not really, that'd only benefit other people who take offence to noisy exhausts, I couldn't care less about them and rather enjoy the burble.

If you drive them back to back today with a completely unbiased approach the most noticeable difference between the two is spool time.
The Scooby has terrible lag and spool speeds but comes on hard above 3k. The Evo is much smoother with its twin scroll, I'd go as far to say it almost has no lag or noticeable power surge as it spools. Better yes, but arguably less exciting.

Other than that Evo is a little more twitchy when pressing on, whereas the the Scooby is less agile but more confidence inspiring.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 01:39 PM
  #26  
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 15
From: To the valley men!
Default

The quote that says it all.
An Evo can make a poor driver look good due to electronics but the Impreza will made a good driver great due to the lack of them.
An EVO relies more on technology than an Impreza.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 01:43 PM
  #27  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

The turn in and change of direction is much better on the evo out of the box, it is so much sharper and more responsive to steering inputs. However the turning circle is pathetic lol
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 01:46 PM
  #28  
Ben_r1's Avatar
Ben_r1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 52
Likes: 6
From: Essex
Default

Hmm if your talking about the Active Centre Diff then I'd have to disagree. In fact many Evo track goers remove this system and fit 'normal' limited slip diffs for a purer driving experience.

The ACD can make for a twitchy experience, and mostly only works when your foots planted, it's certainly not any form of ESP.

Never driven the Evo on track but have had the Scooby around a very slippery Brands Hatch and I'd have to say it doesn't take much skill to go fast, the car really looks after you. Certainly wouldn't trust the Evo going that hard.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 02:55 PM
  #29  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
Liked
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,600
Likes: 24
From: Type R
Default

Still a little sharper I would say and my comparison is based on my type r that had a newage quick rack and chevron increased castor newage arms
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2017 | 02:57 PM
  #30  
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 15
From: To the valley men!
Default

Originally Posted by Ben_r1
Hmm if your talking about the Active Centre Diff then I'd have to disagree. In fact many Evo track goers remove this system and fit 'normal' limited slip diffs for a purer driving experience.

The ACD can make for a twitchy experience, and mostly only works when your foots planted, it's certainly not any form of ESP.

Never driven the Evo on track but have had the Scooby around a very slippery Brands Hatch and I'd have to say it doesn't take much skill to go fast, the car really looks after you. Certainly wouldn't trust the Evo going that hard.
That is my point, people want the "purer" driving experience hence swapping out the ACD. They are also expensive when the do go!
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:55 AM.