Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

WRX STI 2016 - MPG!!!

Old Jun 2, 2016 | 08:27 AM
  #1  
brianrb5's Avatar
brianrb5
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default WRX STI 2016 - MPG!!!

Hi All

So having had two RB5's and a P1 for playing, I've been away from the scoobie fold for a while but am now looking to return. Hoping to order a new WRX STI but this time the car will be a daily drive as well as a fun thing...

So in short, I'm interested to know what peoples thoughts are on living with the car on a daily basis, particularly what MPG you get when you're not ragging it! (I know its wrong, but I will have to commute in this car too!)

Any experience would be gratefully received...

Cheers All
Brian
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 09:16 AM
  #2  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

its been the same engine for years but the 2016 is the unreliable 2.5.

so many better cars available nowadays you must be mad.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 09:57 AM
  #3  
Lunchmoney's Avatar
Lunchmoney
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
From: Dorset, UK
Default

You'll get better MPG with the WRX, not STI.
Plus what Thomas said. For the same money you can get better, faster, more economical cars.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 10:21 AM
  #4  
brianrb5's Avatar
brianrb5
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

True, there are other cars out there, but I don't want an Audi, BMW, Merc, or Honda.

I've test driven the new Focus RS and its not worth £32K, and frankly didn't go much on it anyway...

What else is there?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 10:43 AM
  #5  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

This
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:07 AM
  #6  
brianrb5's Avatar
brianrb5
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Kinda out of my price range!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:10 AM
  #7  
InTurbo's Avatar
InTurbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
From: Oxford
Default

Competition is to good, Must be mad to consider a new Sti.
When Subaru finally wake up and put a stronger direct injection engine with twin scroll and competitive power and mpg levels in the Sti then I'll put a deposit down.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:13 AM
  #8  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

Originally Posted by brianrb5
Kinda out of my price range!
But nobody buys new cars anyway they all rent them.
I'd bet you would get a far better car for similar monthly payments and it will be worth more at the end and would be reliable unlike the 2.5 engine
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:13 AM
  #9  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Originally Posted by brianrb5
Kinda out of my price range!
Why? What do you think it is?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:20 AM
  #10  
brianrb5's Avatar
brianrb5
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Why? What do you think it is?
Its a Tesla right?
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:27 AM
  #11  
jaygsi's Avatar
jaygsi
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 14,530
Likes: 258
From: uk
Default

Heard the WRX has better mpg aswell.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:32 AM
  #12  
Dan_RA's Avatar
Dan_RA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

MPG and Subaru? in the same sentence? oh my days!!! :/
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:37 AM
  #13  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Yeah the model 3
Wrx performance 200+ miles and costs a tenner to charge by all accounts it will be £19 to £24k, but not available yet
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:47 AM
  #14  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Originally Posted by Dan_RA
MPG and Subaru? in the same sentence? oh my days!!! :/
Now your just asking for a 10 pager from RS_MATT on the subject of 45mpg wrx better gearing bla bla bla
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:48 AM
  #15  
brianrb5's Avatar
brianrb5
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Yeah the model 3
Wrx performance 200+ miles and costs a tenner to charge by all accounts it will be £19 to £24k, but not available yet
All good, but I can't wait nearly two years for it to land here!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:51 AM
  #16  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

the 2016 car is heavier and uses a 20 year old engine and gearbox combo so the mpg figures are still poor.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:55 AM
  #17  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,314
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 11:57 AM
  #18  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
then he could fit an sti spoiler,skirts,scoop and intercooler like you so it looks like an sti for the wannabe sti connoisseur.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:05 PM
  #19  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,314
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas
then he could fit an sti spoiler,skirts,scoop and intercooler like you so it looks like an sti for the wannabe sti connoisseur.
I'm quite amazed how ugly the new model is without a boot spoiler.



Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:06 PM
  #20  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
Called it
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:07 PM
  #21  
Dan_RA's Avatar
Dan_RA
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Now your just asking for a 10 pager from RS_MATT on the subject of 45mpg wrx better gearing bla bla bla
she's arrived
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:09 PM
  #22  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,314
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Called it
I like them both tbh, shame there aren't a few more on the roads as I think they are good for Subaru's dwindling UK image.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:22 PM
  #23  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas
its been the same engine for years but the 2016 is the unreliable 2.5.

so many better cars available nowadays you must be mad.
From a quick google it would appear Subaru decided ringland failure wasn't enough, so they've given it the party trick of spinning rod bearings as well.

I'm not sure they could pay me enough to own one tbh.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:24 PM
  #24  
scooby k's Avatar
scooby k
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Lunchmoney
You'll get better MPG with the WRX, not STI.
Plus what Thomas said. For the same money you can get better, faster, more economical cars.


You can buy a 2015 Golf R, 0-60 in 5.1 sec ( manual ), better fuel economy, better dd and better looking. They sound quite nice too.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:30 PM
  #25  
Steve001's Avatar
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 1
From: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
Called it
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2016 | 12:34 PM
  #26  
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 8,701
Likes: 128
From: Herts & Bucks
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Called it

Reply
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 08:44 AM
  #27  
4evascoob's Avatar
4evascoob
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 525
Likes: 33
Default

The Answer to your question by someone who owns one is 30 mpg on one trip not a motorway and driven anally but normally Circa 24-25 mpg.
Btw great car regardless of what some say.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 09:03 AM
  #28  
CharlySkunkWeed's Avatar
CharlySkunkWeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 70
From: Bangor-Northern Ireland
Default

Originally Posted by 4evascoob
The Answer to your question by someone who owns one is 30 mpg on one trip not a motorway and driven anally but normally Circa 24-25 mpg.
Btw great car regardless of what some say.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 09:49 AM
  #29  
jonnyricer2's Avatar
jonnyricer2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
From: bexhill east sussex
Default

I would personally would buy a blob eye sti and a cheaper more economical car to commute in and still have say 5k in the bank.

Just a thought
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2016 | 10:09 AM
  #30  
CharlySkunkWeed's Avatar
CharlySkunkWeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 70
From: Bangor-Northern Ireland
Default

Originally Posted by jonnyricer2
I would personally would buy a blob eye sti and a cheaper more economical car to commute in and still have say 5k in the bank.

Just a thought
For the daily commute, the newer models are a far nicer place to be though.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:48 PM.