Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

WRX STI 2016 - MPG!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 June 2016, 08:27 AM
  #1  
brianrb5
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
brianrb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default WRX STI 2016 - MPG!!!

Hi All

So having had two RB5's and a P1 for playing, I've been away from the scoobie fold for a while but am now looking to return. Hoping to order a new WRX STI but this time the car will be a daily drive as well as a fun thing...

So in short, I'm interested to know what peoples thoughts are on living with the car on a daily basis, particularly what MPG you get when you're not ragging it! (I know its wrong, but I will have to commute in this car too!)

Any experience would be gratefully received...

Cheers All
Brian
Old 02 June 2016, 09:16 AM
  #2  
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
fat-thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fawor's car wash
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

its been the same engine for years but the 2016 is the unreliable 2.5.

so many better cars available nowadays you must be mad.
Old 02 June 2016, 09:57 AM
  #3  
Lunchmoney
Scooby Regular
 
Lunchmoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Dorset, UK
Posts: 355
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You'll get better MPG with the WRX, not STI.
Plus what Thomas said. For the same money you can get better, faster, more economical cars.
Old 02 June 2016, 10:21 AM
  #4  
brianrb5
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
brianrb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

True, there are other cars out there, but I don't want an Audi, BMW, Merc, or Honda.

I've test driven the new Focus RS and its not worth £32K, and frankly didn't go much on it anyway...

What else is there?
Old 02 June 2016, 10:43 AM
  #5  
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Steve001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This
Old 02 June 2016, 11:07 AM
  #6  
brianrb5
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
brianrb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Kinda out of my price range!
Old 02 June 2016, 11:10 AM
  #7  
InTurbo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
InTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Oxford
Posts: 739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Competition is to good, Must be mad to consider a new Sti.
When Subaru finally wake up and put a stronger direct injection engine with twin scroll and competitive power and mpg levels in the Sti then I'll put a deposit down.
Old 02 June 2016, 11:13 AM
  #8  
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
fat-thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fawor's car wash
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brianrb5
Kinda out of my price range!
But nobody buys new cars anyway they all rent them.
I'd bet you would get a far better car for similar monthly payments and it will be worth more at the end and would be reliable unlike the 2.5 engine
Old 02 June 2016, 11:13 AM
  #9  
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Steve001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by brianrb5
Kinda out of my price range!
Why? What do you think it is?
Old 02 June 2016, 11:20 AM
  #10  
brianrb5
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
brianrb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Why? What do you think it is?
Its a Tesla right?
Old 02 June 2016, 11:27 AM
  #11  
jaygsi
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
 
jaygsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: uk
Posts: 14,530
Received 256 Likes on 222 Posts
Default

Heard the WRX has better mpg aswell.
Old 02 June 2016, 11:32 AM
  #12  
Dan_RA
Scooby Regular
 
Dan_RA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

MPG and Subaru? in the same sentence? oh my days!!! :/
Old 02 June 2016, 11:37 AM
  #13  
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Steve001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yeah the model 3
Wrx performance 200+ miles and costs a tenner to charge by all accounts it will be £19 to £24k, but not available yet
Old 02 June 2016, 11:47 AM
  #14  
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Steve001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Dan_RA
MPG and Subaru? in the same sentence? oh my days!!! :/
Now your just asking for a 10 pager from RS_MATT on the subject of 45mpg wrx better gearing bla bla bla
Old 02 June 2016, 11:48 AM
  #15  
brianrb5
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
brianrb5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Yeah the model 3
Wrx performance 200+ miles and costs a tenner to charge by all accounts it will be £19 to £24k, but not available yet
All good, but I can't wait nearly two years for it to land here!
Old 02 June 2016, 11:51 AM
  #16  
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
fat-thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fawor's car wash
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the 2016 car is heavier and uses a 20 year old engine and gearbox combo so the mpg figures are still poor.
Old 02 June 2016, 11:55 AM
  #17  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
Old 02 June 2016, 11:57 AM
  #18  
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
fat-thomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: fawor's car wash
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
then he could fit an sti spoiler,skirts,scoop and intercooler like you so it looks like an sti for the wannabe sti connoisseur.
Old 02 June 2016, 12:05 PM
  #19  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas
then he could fit an sti spoiler,skirts,scoop and intercooler like you so it looks like an sti for the wannabe sti connoisseur.
I'm quite amazed how ugly the new model is without a boot spoiler.



Old 02 June 2016, 12:06 PM
  #20  
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Steve001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
Called it
Old 02 June 2016, 12:07 PM
  #21  
Dan_RA
Scooby Regular
 
Dan_RA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Now your just asking for a 10 pager from RS_MATT on the subject of 45mpg wrx better gearing bla bla bla
she's arrived
Old 02 June 2016, 12:09 PM
  #22  
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
RS_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Wakefield
Posts: 5,303
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Called it
I like them both tbh, shame there aren't a few more on the roads as I think they are good for Subaru's dwindling UK image.
Old 02 June 2016, 12:22 PM
  #23  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas
its been the same engine for years but the 2016 is the unreliable 2.5.

so many better cars available nowadays you must be mad.
From a quick google it would appear Subaru decided ringland failure wasn't enough, so they've given it the party trick of spinning rod bearings as well.

I'm not sure they could pay me enough to own one tbh.
Old 02 June 2016, 12:24 PM
  #24  
scooby k
Scooby Regular
 
scooby k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Lunchmoney
You'll get better MPG with the WRX, not STI.
Plus what Thomas said. For the same money you can get better, faster, more economical cars.


You can buy a 2015 Golf R, 0-60 in 5.1 sec ( manual ), better fuel economy, better dd and better looking. They sound quite nice too.
Old 02 June 2016, 12:30 PM
  #25  
Steve001
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Steve001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Chester (Tumbleweed City!)
Posts: 3,695
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Engineering Explained tested the STi at 26mpg (23 rated) and the WRX at 35mpg (28 rated).

He also tested the 0-60's and managed 5.5secs for the 305hp STi and 5.0 for the 268hp WRX with torque coming in 2,000rpm earlier on the WRX. The WRX is still rumored to have a 350lbft limit (rods) but the WRX is quite potent under the cap due to it's efficiency.

Certainly worth considering for the the less aggressive Subaru connoisseur.
Called it
Old 02 June 2016, 12:34 PM
  #26  
BrownPantsRacing
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
BrownPantsRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Herts & Bucks
Posts: 8,700
Received 128 Likes on 107 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Steve001
Called it

Old 04 June 2016, 08:44 AM
  #27  
4evascoob
Scooby Regular
 
4evascoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

The Answer to your question by someone who owns one is 30 mpg on one trip not a motorway and driven anally but normally Circa 24-25 mpg.
Btw great car regardless of what some say.
Old 04 June 2016, 09:03 AM
  #28  
CharlySkunkWeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
CharlySkunkWeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bangor-Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,499
Received 70 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 4evascoob
The Answer to your question by someone who owns one is 30 mpg on one trip not a motorway and driven anally but normally Circa 24-25 mpg.
Btw great car regardless of what some say.
Old 04 June 2016, 09:49 AM
  #29  
jonnyricer2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
jonnyricer2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: bexhill east sussex
Posts: 1,342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would personally would buy a blob eye sti and a cheaper more economical car to commute in and still have say 5k in the bank.

Just a thought
Old 04 June 2016, 10:09 AM
  #30  
CharlySkunkWeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
CharlySkunkWeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bangor-Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,499
Received 70 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonnyricer2
I would personally would buy a blob eye sti and a cheaper more economical car to commute in and still have say 5k in the bank.

Just a thought
For the daily commute, the newer models are a far nicer place to be though.


Quick Reply: WRX STI 2016 - MPG!!!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:07 AM.