Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

0-60 time of your scoob...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10 June 2002, 12:01 AM
  #1  
snowcrash
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
snowcrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: www.scoobyzone.co.uk
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

be honest !

i'd estimate that mine was around 6.5secs (without destroying clutch/gearbox/engine) for a quick acceration start on average road surface / conditions. (e.g. in a **** around race easily beating a Nova GTE 1.6i)

MY99 UK Turbo.
Old 10 June 2002, 01:05 AM
  #2  
steve McCulloch
Scooby Regular
 
steve McCulloch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hmmm - 4 seconds tops and a 0-100 just under 10 seconds

Old 10 June 2002, 10:57 AM
  #3  
bits'n'pieces
Scooby Regular
 
bits'n'pieces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

look in the old posts...or FAQ .....
Old 10 June 2002, 11:00 AM
  #4  
TonyG
Scooby Regular
 
TonyG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The dark side of the Sun and owner of 2 fairy tokens
Posts: 5,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Mine only accelerates as fast as the car in front...
Old 10 June 2002, 11:01 AM
  #5  
Makalu
Scooby Regular
 
Makalu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 701
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

About 8.5secs to 60MPH.

While Im here, whats that stick that pokes up between the front seats for?

Mak.
;o
Old 10 June 2002, 11:54 AM
  #6  
snowcrash
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
snowcrash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: www.scoobyzone.co.uk
Posts: 2,082
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

technically i started pulling at 5000rev's and didn't "Drop the clutch" (as i would like to keep it running nice).

those sort of results are usually done with 15 attempts without giving a flying crap about the car (i.e. full bore starts and jamming the gears in without using the clutch)..

simon.
Old 10 June 2002, 12:30 PM
  #7  
RICH WILD
Scooby Regular
 
RICH WILD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hi,

Using my brother's O-60 timer on his HKS turbo timer (so not as accurate as proper timing gear but better than shouting at your passenger holding a stopwatch!) I clocked a 4.81 sec 0-60 time on a wet road (not raining though)!

His car then was a standard MY97 with full decat exhaust only and uprated suspension.

His clutch did smell for a while afterwards though!!

Rich

Trending Topics

Old 10 June 2002, 01:11 PM
  #8  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

0-60 is a load of bollox when it comes to comparing cars, especially turbo-charged ones. It is too dependent on how much abuse you are prepared to give the vehicle, the condition of the road surface, and most importantly, whether the car will do it in second gear or not!
Obviously with a turbo'd car if you do it on a cold damp day it is going to be quicker than a stinking hot dry day, on a cold day the air is denser, therefore a higher oxygen content, and on a cold slightly damp road surface the rear tyres are more likely to break traction slightly allowing the engine to stay on boost, especially with the older cars like mine, which won't get out of bed for less than 4000rpm.


I would recommend anyone contemplating attempting a true 0-60 test reads an article by John Barker in the Nov 93 copy of Performance Car, in it he details sitting next to a fellow tester (David Vivian, I think) whilst he put a 964 model 911 Turbo through its standing start paces, 330bhp meets a total of 18" of P-Zero. He revved the car to 6000rpm, side-stepped the clutch, and sheared both driveshafts clean off the gearbox - Ouch!
Old 12 July 2002, 09:33 AM
  #9  
peccy
Scooby Regular
 
peccy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: roth
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Turbo 2000
full decat
258bhp
3 people in car
slightly uphill

4.3Secs

check it...

http://www.dubdesign.free-online.co....y0-60in4-3.wmv

reckon with just me in car and a better start id get 3.5ish

cheers, peccy
Old 12 July 2002, 09:39 AM
  #10  
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
P20SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

wasnt there an article in revs(?) magazine in june 2000 that had scoobs against cossies. they had standard, midly modded, modded, and heavily modded i think.

i think one of them managed to crack 4 secs. i might be wrong though!

i am sure some of them featured were from SIDC.
Old 12 July 2002, 09:49 AM
  #11  
CraigH
Scooby Regular
 
CraigH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

3.7secs.

(or 2.5 if I time it from the speedo )

Old 12 July 2002, 09:16 PM
  #12  
colin c
Scooby Regular
 
colin c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Southampton, 12.7 1/4 mile purple Scooby
Posts: 839
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Peccy,

Sorry but if Craig H took 3.7 with approx 400bhp, how can you possibly achieve 3.5 with only 258bhp ? My 94 wrx rolling roaded at 265bhp only managed 4.8. Mine and Craig's times were recorded useing GPS timing gear for Banzai magazine, extremely accurate timing compared with timing on the road against a clock or meter. My Scooby is now running in excess of 300bhp and I think I would still struggle to get a 4.3 sec 0-60.

Colin.
Old 12 July 2002, 09:27 PM
  #13  
Katana
Scooby Regular
 
Katana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: In a house
Posts: 5,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

3 sec...
Old 12 July 2002, 09:29 PM
  #14  
rich a
Scooby Regular
 
rich a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 420
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

12sec
Old 12 July 2002, 09:31 PM
  #15  
Turboteeth
Scooby Regular
 
Turboteeth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What Snowcrash meant to put was more like 7.5 seconds AND he has a downpipe, backbox, dawes and quickshift!!!

Clearly the driver aint up to much
Old 12 July 2002, 09:45 PM
  #16  
droid42
Scooby Regular
 
droid42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Sorry but if Craig H took 3.7 with approx 400bhp, how can you possibly achieve 3.5 with only 258bhp

He can't ... it's just about as close to impossible as it's possible to get

Same as an average sustained 180bhp at the wheels, including launch, gearchanges etc.

Wishful thinking.

Ian.
Old 12 July 2002, 10:59 PM
  #17  
peccy
Scooby Regular
 
peccy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: roth
Posts: 3,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

colin c,

i thought my method of timing was quite accurate,

the digital camera i used records at 25 frames per second so therefore accurate to 1/25th of a sec?

if you play the clip back by using the slider bar and watch the clock in your video clip software you can see the needle go from 0mph to 60mph in 4.3 seconds

a lot depends on the start though, i did three runs, the other 2 were above 5 secs!.

im going to film it again with a stopwatch mounted on the dash and the camera stuck to the roof, then work the seconds out from that, with just me in car reckon ill get under 4 secs, watch this space...

Old 12 July 2002, 11:07 PM
  #18  
droid42
Scooby Regular
 
droid42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

if you play the clip back by using the slider bar and watch the clock in your video clip software you can see the needle go from 0mph to 60mph in 4.3 seconds

<sigh> ... but when your needle shows 60mph on the speedo you're not doing an actual 60mph. It's more likely you did around 4.6-4.7s and (I repeat) 3.5s from a 4WD 258mph is just about physically impossible.

Ian.
Old 12 July 2002, 11:12 PM
  #19  
droid42
Scooby Regular
 
droid42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

... and you won't get sub-4 secs either (except in your dreams )

Ian.
Old 12 July 2002, 11:16 PM
  #20  
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (2)
 
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: From far, far away...
Posts: 16,978
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Cool

Having been with CraigH & Stef @ said REVS shootout...

Bog Standard MY99 (Wagon ) on NUL with me driving 5.8s

The trick (I did 5 runs) was NOT to change up to 3rd as standard gearing in 2nd means rev limiter @ 62mph, so keep the changes down & foot to floor

200+ shootout in Aug is likely to not improve much (for me) as only addition of PPP but will be running SUL, but it will be a drag style 1/4 , so no benefit of keeping the revs on to get a good 0-60 when going for the 1/4...

For the speedo thingy, an indicated 150 was approx 134 true MPH, although it looked good

Old 12 July 2002, 11:20 PM
  #21  
SCOSaltire
Scooby Regular
 
SCOSaltire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

5.5 secs average with very easy on the clutch - just 2000 revs and let the clutch fully enguage.

was 6 secs with this method b4 i got the car ppped

Old 13 July 2002, 12:06 AM
  #22  
DJ140
Scooby Regular
 
DJ140's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: North Yorks, MY03 PPP, now run a Mondeo ST TDCI 06
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The speedo on my MY00 seems very accurate. The Bluei radar detector shows 102MPH at 100MPH on the speedo.

Any one know how accurate GPS tracking devices are?

Dan
Old 13 July 2002, 12:07 AM
  #23  
hades
Scooby Regular
 
hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

[banzai voice] Will Peccy get 3.5 secs 0-60 with 258bhp? Place bets now! [/banzai voice]

I think it's marginally less likely he'll do sub 4 than the motorway speed limit being increased to 120mph this year.

Guess my fairly stock new age would probably do sub 6 if I was nasty off the line.
Old 13 July 2002, 01:45 AM
  #24  
gaz turbo
Scooby Regular
 
gaz turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 494
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

its getting abit technical in here anywhere under 5 seconds is f*****g quick my friends i have personally done 5.2 in my99 turbo although timed by stopwatch but that will do me for the time being we are one if not the quickest cars around apart from supercars etc...

so lets sit back and enjoy it >>>>>>>
Old 13 July 2002, 09:28 AM
  #25  
skiddusmarkus
Scooby Regular
 
skiddusmarkus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 817
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Low 4secs in my GTiR.It's not standard though.My speedo is very accurate(surprisingly)as when I go through the finish on a 1/4 mile and compare my speedo reading to the time slip they're identical.
Peccy which bit of Sheffield ar you from,I'm just down the A61 South from there?
Old 13 July 2002, 09:42 AM
  #26  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Unhappy

Got to say that im with the others here Peccy
your probably pushing sub 5 secs but only just, even a PPP'd turbo with 250bhp is only capable of 4.9 secs and that is probably being quite harsh on the car too
You really need a GPS readout to see what sort of 0-60 times your getting, and having people in your car will only add 1 or 2 10th's of a second to your time, it will show more in gear though.

Tony
Old 13 July 2002, 11:31 AM
  #27  
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
chrisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Can we do 0-75 instead as my car only does 58 in 2nd but does 75 in 3rd

I know it does 0 to 1.2bar in about 2000rpm

I do agree 0-60 just shows how much traction versus power a car has and that why scoobs get good 0-60 as they can put a large amount of power down. Take a standard classic STI 0-60 in about 4.5 but 0-100 is about 12 seconds so 60-100 7.5 doesnt sound that impressed anymore does it . Thats where we loose out once its rolling the 4WD is a only going to slow us down and cause big transmission losses. Having said that I prefer a car with AWD.

0-60 in my car dont know 0-58 its pretty quick though .

cheers

chrisp
Old 13 July 2002, 11:43 AM
  #28  
DARREN
Scooby Regular
 
DARREN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 1,039
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I recon i'd be looking at 4.3 seconds in a 296 bhp STI!!!!!!!!!!

Darren
Old 13 July 2002, 11:52 AM
  #29  
catflap
Scooby Regular
 
catflap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

I have 4 sec 0-60 soon to be closer to 3 with nos

My 0-100 is 8 seconds give or take

But its a westy
Old 15 July 2002, 10:56 AM
  #30  
CraigH
Scooby Regular
 
CraigH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 3,675
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

My car had a rumoured 360hp at the Banzai day, not 400. Wish it was though

As Catflap is showing off , our new 0-60 time will probably be less than 4secs - or faster with NOS



Quick Reply: 0-60 time of your scoob...



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:31 AM.