How much better is a classic STI?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Jersey
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How much better is a classic STI?
So I see a lot of WRX hate on here so I am wondering how much better are STI's? Particularly in the case of a classic. Looking at the power figures there isn't much in it. Is it a case of all the little things add together to make them that little bit more special?
I bought my 1994 WRX because it was very cheap off a friend and I really enjoy it. It's plenty rapid, especially for Jersey (has a couple of things done like full decat exhaust, piggy back ECU, 4 pot Subaru callipers, front, rear and underbody strut braces, Speedtouch Turini's and lowering springs) and it makes me think is the gulf between it and a 1994 STI that large?
I ask as it is a temptation to upgrade to an STI at some point as I like the car far more than I thought I would once I have finished my degree, but I would hate to spend a fair premium on one. All in the WRX stands me at about £1500 after purchase and replacing a few tired items and I can't think of a car that would give me this much bang for my buck.
Thanks
Ross
I bought my 1994 WRX because it was very cheap off a friend and I really enjoy it. It's plenty rapid, especially for Jersey (has a couple of things done like full decat exhaust, piggy back ECU, 4 pot Subaru callipers, front, rear and underbody strut braces, Speedtouch Turini's and lowering springs) and it makes me think is the gulf between it and a 1994 STI that large?
I ask as it is a temptation to upgrade to an STI at some point as I like the car far more than I thought I would once I have finished my degree, but I would hate to spend a fair premium on one. All in the WRX stands me at about £1500 after purchase and replacing a few tired items and I can't think of a car that would give me this much bang for my buck.
Thanks
Ross
#2
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: www.dsoc.co.nr
Posts: 979
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Prestige really.
Later Classic STI's run different turbos than the WRX but power was about the same. There were a few suspension differences but apart from that not a lot. Both WRX and STI are better spec'd and more standard power than UK Turbo 2000 (but these easily be brought up to equivalent for not much money).
RA guise though the STI got DCCD and roof flap, WRX didn't.
Later Classic STI's run different turbos than the WRX but power was about the same. There were a few suspension differences but apart from that not a lot. Both WRX and STI are better spec'd and more standard power than UK Turbo 2000 (but these easily be brought up to equivalent for not much money).
RA guise though the STI got DCCD and roof flap, WRX didn't.
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Jersey
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting. Have been doing the classic man maths of do I save and buy an STI, or work to get my WRX to a good standard and use the extra money to spend on a few choice upgrades
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (46)
ESL and a remap would be £700, so your talking at least £1000 and a 2000 turbo will be same bhp as wrx or sti
Prestige really.
Later Classic STI's run different turbos than the WRX but power was about the same. There were a few suspension differences but apart from that not a lot. Both WRX and STI are better spec'd and more standard power than UK Turbo 2000 (but these easily be brought up to equivalent for not much money).
RA guise though the STI got DCCD and roof flap, WRX didn't.
Later Classic STI's run different turbos than the WRX but power was about the same. There were a few suspension differences but apart from that not a lot. Both WRX and STI are better spec'd and more standard power than UK Turbo 2000 (but these easily be brought up to equivalent for not much money).
RA guise though the STI got DCCD and roof flap, WRX didn't.
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
This. The main differences between GC8 WRX and STi are forged pistons and DCCD. The GC8 WRX is still a very powerful, quick car and much closer to STi performance than the newage WRX is to the newage STi.
Given that the newest classics are now 15 years old I would be less concerned about WRX vs STi and more concerned about history and condition.
Given that the newest classics are now 15 years old I would be less concerned about WRX vs STi and more concerned about history and condition.
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This. The main differences between GC8 WRX and STi are forged pistons and DCCD. The GC8 WRX is still a very powerful, quick car and much closer to STi performance than the newage WRX is to the newage STi.
Given that the newest classics are now 15 years old I would be less concerned about WRX vs STi and more concerned about history and condition.
Given that the newest classics are now 15 years old I would be less concerned about WRX vs STi and more concerned about history and condition.
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
I think a lot of people think of it as a named thing.
I mean, if you had a choice of buying a pair of Nike trainers or a pair of Hi-Tec what would you go for? It sounds much better in saying "I bought a pair of Nike trainers" rather than "I bought a pair of HI-Tec"
I reckon its the same as "I drive an Sti" Snobby lol
I mean, if you had a choice of buying a pair of Nike trainers or a pair of Hi-Tec what would you go for? It sounds much better in saying "I bought a pair of Nike trainers" rather than "I bought a pair of HI-Tec"
I reckon its the same as "I drive an Sti" Snobby lol
#25
Yes, mobile to your door, road map, dyno £75 extra I believe.
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Jersey
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The condition is average I would say, but it's rot free and all together in terms of condition of bushes, engine runs lovely (although it has developed a niggle, just about to start a thread about it) and it drives really nice.
I've put 4 matching Falkens on it to replace the mismatched crap that was on it before and done a full fluids service with fully synthetic, top quality oil (Motul). As I say, it only stands me at £1500 all in now so previous history and condition isn't a major concern for me, although it did come with a huge stack of receipts.
I have looked at an ESL board and there is a local company who fits and maps them, quoted between £650-750 so will probably go down that route at some point once the rest of the car is in a standard I am happy with. I'll be replacing things like engine/gearbox mounts, renewing gearshift linkage and a few chassis modifications before I go chasing any more power. It certainly gets to our 40mph limit quick enough
What is a good route to take with the brakes btw without spending silly money? I have refreshed the fluid and checked the pads and discs out and they stop the car ok but aren't exactly confidence inspiring and I wouldn't want to have much more power on them.
Thanks
I've put 4 matching Falkens on it to replace the mismatched crap that was on it before and done a full fluids service with fully synthetic, top quality oil (Motul). As I say, it only stands me at £1500 all in now so previous history and condition isn't a major concern for me, although it did come with a huge stack of receipts.
I have looked at an ESL board and there is a local company who fits and maps them, quoted between £650-750 so will probably go down that route at some point once the rest of the car is in a standard I am happy with. I'll be replacing things like engine/gearbox mounts, renewing gearshift linkage and a few chassis modifications before I go chasing any more power. It certainly gets to our 40mph limit quick enough
What is a good route to take with the brakes btw without spending silly money? I have refreshed the fluid and checked the pads and discs out and they stop the car ok but aren't exactly confidence inspiring and I wouldn't want to have much more power on them.
Thanks
#27
In response to the original question, the difference to a pre 96 wrx and sti is very little, with the exception of the ver 2 sti ra which gets solid lifter heads and dccd.
A v2 wrx has a 260PS Z4 ECU and a v2 sti has a 276PS 6K ECU. The maps are identical but for a touch more boost on the 6K. When mapped, there is no difference, injectors and turbo (td05-16g) are the same. It's worth going to a later MAP sensor to give you extra boost headroom (1.2 to 1.7bar max).
A v2 wrx has a 260PS Z4 ECU and a v2 sti has a 276PS 6K ECU. The maps are identical but for a touch more boost on the 6K. When mapped, there is no difference, injectors and turbo (td05-16g) are the same. It's worth going to a later MAP sensor to give you extra boost headroom (1.2 to 1.7bar max).
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
Lots of people advise big brakes, but for me a well-maintained four-pot setup (refurb or new calipers with stainless pistons), with braided hoses and good pads (I am using RC5+) is more than adequate for the road.
The brakes on my MY99 car however are certainly better feeling than my MY93 car was though, even after changing calipers, pads, fluid, master and slave cylinders on the older car. Not sure why as I'm not aware of any different parts other than possibly a different servo.
The brakes on my MY99 car however are certainly better feeling than my MY93 car was though, even after changing calipers, pads, fluid, master and slave cylinders on the older car. Not sure why as I'm not aware of any different parts other than possibly a different servo.