Notices
Projects For Serious DIY Car Projects

Project STi Time Attack

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06 June 2007, 02:51 PM
  #1  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Project STi Time Attack

I thought I would start a new project thread for my car to help me to prepare the car ready for Time Attack at the end of July up at Knockhill. If all goes to plan it should be almost ready for shakedown at Cadwell Park on the 16th July.

Issues:

1. Injector duty too high running at 95+% IDC at the moment even with 3.8 bar fuel pressure
2. Air restrictions caused by airbox
3. Oil throw issue on prolonged cornering causing catch can to fill within a few laps
4. Suspension needs to be lowered and reduction of body roll and allowing greater cornering speeds
5. Tyres ... I need some
6. Brakes
7. TA Specifics

Plan of Attack:

1. 800cc injectors are ready to be fitted along with adjustments to the mapping to suit and small increase of boost as we had to back it off to keep within 100% IDC. This should liberate the top end a little more where duty cycle issues really get highlighted. This will extend the available power range upwards slightly giving the option to hold a shorter gear through a section rather than short shifting prior to a corner.

Power-wise I would expect another 15-20 bhp from this in the peak region but more importantly give me IDC of 80% as a max.

2. APS 70mm inner-wing mounted induction kit arrives tomorrow and will get fitted before the injectors as it will be easier to adjust the MAF scaling first to suit this and then factor in higher flow injectors than the other way around. Aside from an increase in induction noise (which I personally dont like much) it will make the whole induction system flow better and should increase both torque and bhp figures a tad once mapped to suit

3. The Oil Throw issue needs solving as I do not want to be depositing oil onto the track for other competitiors or for me to have a moment on. I have decided to go the whole hog this time and fit a 3 x inlet, 1 x breather and 1 drain 2.6 litre catch can from Roger Clark Motorsport. This will be aeroquipped to drain back any collected oil to the sump, thereby keeping the oil within the engine and not sprayed underneath my car Whereas 2.6 litres does seem excessively large, I am fed up with having to drain the catch can after half a dozen spirited laps.

The catch can does not catch hardly anything during normal road use even at high boost so can 100% be solved by this solution.

This is a photo of Bob Rawle's solution that I will be putting in place (although i will be using a banjo bolt rather than a straight feed):



4. Suspension - This is strangely a lower priority than the others but as my existing suspension seems to work ok enough as it stands, it would be great to make it better but not 100% essential if funds are limited. Shortlist at the moment is: EXE-TC and KW Variant 3.

5. Tyres - looking for a small supply of R rated, probably Yoko 048's 235/45/17 for my spare wheels (sponsors would be greatly appreciated on these )

6. Brakes - not really an issue now with the PF discs and pads but will be removing the backing plates and fitting cooling ducts to ensure that they stay as good as they can be.

7. TA specifics - I will need to go through the regs to ensure that the car will pass scrutineering.... be a bloody long way to go only to be turned away for a stupid thing


The end power result should be in the order of:

380 bhp
420 lb/ft

Not huge figures by the levels of some here, but with torque of over 350 lb/ft from 2800 to 5500rpm it should be pretty rapid around the track
Old 06 June 2007, 06:08 PM
  #2  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Look forward to your solutions!
I know a hillclimber with the same oil flooding issues, yet i do not suffer at all and sometimes I'm as fast as him.
Is it a 2 litre?

Graham
Old 06 June 2007, 06:26 PM
  #3  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hi Graham

Nope sorry should have said: 2.5 STi 2006

The oil throw issue has had me vexxed for a while as shown on 22b.com but going to get it solved now once and for all thanks to great input from the massive knowledge base of guys there.

This is the car:




Latest Dyno Sheet:

(i am not wanting a debate on the validity or whatever or dyno sheets means jack diddly ... so save that for someone else .... just posting to give background for the project )
Old 07 June 2007, 07:03 AM
  #4  
essexboy30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
essexboy30's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Back in the UK at last!!!
Posts: 2,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Good luck Duncan!
Old 07 June 2007, 07:26 AM
  #5  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My friend's engine is a steel revvy 2 litre.
Will fill a 2 litre tin on every 40 second hillclimb!

He has a 'sump vent pipe' which i think is the issue.
Old 07 June 2007, 07:48 AM
  #6  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Is it coming out of the sump vent Graham?

(cheers Mike )
Old 08 June 2007, 01:29 PM
  #7  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Tyres

I am trying to make a decision on the tyres to use at the moment. Choice is:

Toyo R888

or

Yokohama A048R

Cost wise the Yokohama work out at about £50 a tyre cheaper

Anyone have any views as to comparability between the R888 and medium compound 48's?
Old 08 June 2007, 07:12 PM
  #8  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The sump pipe is the issue i think.
Mine doesn't have one and the catch tank has 5 mm of oil in it after 3 years, and the FMIC/pipes are perfectly dry.

Tyres?

Bloody minefield!

Graham.
Old 08 June 2007, 07:31 PM
  #9  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Absolutely Graham - my wallet is leading me in the direction of Yoko's at the mo but either way they will offer more grip than my RE070's although they are very good.

What do you run on Hillclimbs?
Old 08 June 2007, 08:20 PM
  #10  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

List 1B?

No question, the fab Kumho V70/700's.
Soft compound if you can (only on 16''/15'') or medium on 17''.

They are insane in the dry and damp. Pouring rain?

Any old List 1A but the Marigoni Linea seem superb to me.

In the dry then the AVON slicks are Kind.

If you can run 1B then personally I would run Kumho.
(bit pricey now though)

Graham.
Old 09 June 2007, 02:26 PM
  #11  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default more power captain

Date fixed for fitting of the injectors and APS kit - 28th June

Mapping will also be done to optimise the boost across the board.

Will also be getting two sets of maps done:

1) V-power for normal running

2) V-power plus CVL Turbo octane Booster (total of 103 octane) for fun stuff

Now that I have the necessary hardware I will be able to swap to the fun map for track days etc and swap back for times where I dont want to stick an extra £10 in the tank

We should be able to run a chunk more advance on the 103 octane and get a significant increase in power/torque ..... or thats the plan anyway
Old 09 June 2007, 09:11 PM
  #12  
Floyd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Floyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,470
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I don't get much oil in my catch can either. I vent 3 breathers to it.

F
Old 09 June 2007, 11:25 PM
  #13  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Nor do I normally - just some tracks that do it.

Strangely i dont have the oil breather issue at the ring - guess I'm not driving quick enough yet
Old 10 June 2007, 12:03 AM
  #14  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you're referring to rob, you need to get your facts straight.

Originally Posted by 911
My friend's engine is a steel revvy 2 litre.
Will fill a 2 litre tin on every 40 second hillclimb!

He has a 'sump vent pipe' which i think is the issue.
Old 10 June 2007, 11:17 AM
  #15  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Does anyone know what sort of performance increase you would get from mapping to 103 octane rather than vpower?
Old 10 June 2007, 02:46 PM
  #16  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

probably 20hp or so, but depends on the engine
Old 10 June 2007, 03:19 PM
  #17  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Nice .... saw Terryb's results from the racefuel mapping - thought it had to be worth it. Rather than just using octane boost for the sake of it, getting the map changed to suit but allowing for a degree of margin for track temps.

Obviously I could change the static advance across, but I am guessing that this would:

a) be dangerous as it may not be a case that an extra x degrees advance could be run across the whole range
b) doing without det detection would be difficult
c) assuming that the std ECU will pull back timing enough If too much was added is a little too risky (ie very risky )
Old 10 June 2007, 04:25 PM
  #18  
Lateral Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (20)
 
Lateral Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: 8.95 @ 168mph. Zero to 1KM 194.1mph
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Consider having a map with a 10-12% methanol mix.

It gives very good results, and is cheaper than any of the other octane boosters.


Mark.
Old 10 June 2007, 04:42 PM
  #19  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Hi Mark

I have looked at that but I am not sure that I am allowed to run that mixture up at TA. Thought that the octane booster was less hassle (albeit expensive)

The next major step beyond these mods is:



MD321 in either H or T varieties

(oh and pistons - forged flavour)

Have any H's been fitted to 2.5's yet? - would love to see some results

Last edited by dynamix; 10 June 2007 at 04:44 PM.
Old 10 June 2007, 06:12 PM
  #20  
terryb
Scooby Regular
 
terryb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: in motoring nirvana.....
Posts: 2,443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dynamix
Hi Mark

I have looked at that but I am not sure that I am allowed to run that mixture up at TA. Thought that the octane booster was less hassle (albeit expensive)

I'm sure that would be ok as some were running VP Import - which is about 123 RON I believe
Old 10 June 2007, 06:21 PM
  #21  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

123 ron .... eeek
Old 11 June 2007, 08:26 AM
  #22  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Can anyone tell me at what point does the std STi clutch become as issue?
Old 11 June 2007, 01:18 PM
  #23  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'll offer 300 lbft.
I went to AP Organic at that level (near stock Sti V3 with 3'' decat).

Graham
Old 11 June 2007, 01:37 PM
  #24  
Tone Loc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Tone Loc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 5,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911
I'll offer 300 lbft.
I went to AP Organic at that level (near stock Sti V3 with 3'' decat).

Graham
I'd offer more than that, remember the PPP pack for this year clams 332lb/ft and i don't think Prodrive would push their luck with the clutch considering the 3 year warranty.

Tony.
Old 11 June 2007, 01:46 PM
  #25  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

mine is still going strong on a std clutch at 400 lb/ft - I dont do 1/4 miles though
Old 11 June 2007, 02:27 PM
  #26  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

With a few miles on, the standard clutch slips at around 430ft-lb.
Old 11 June 2007, 02:32 PM
  #27  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

hmmm ... close then

Would I be right in assuming that the exedy twin plate seems to be the pick of the bunch for a well behaved car on the road aswell as track - that's what you run isnt it Paul that JF commented about?
Old 11 June 2007, 03:27 PM
  #28  
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
ZEN Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would go with pinnk box exedy organic, works nicely and more cost effective if you're not doing lots of drag racing.
Old 11 June 2007, 03:50 PM
  #29  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

oh right - cool.

One will go on the list when the current clutch is outpowered by the car or wears out (or both)
Old 11 June 2007, 05:54 PM
  #30  
911
Scooby Regular
 
911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11,341
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thought this was a classic Sti.
Graham.


Quick Reply: Project STi Time Attack



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 PM.