Hypocrisy, thy name is...Liebour!
Owen Smith sacked for stating that he belives there should be a second referendum.:thumb:
And who pops up to defend Jezza Flip-Flop-Man, saying that there should be no place on the front bench for anyone not supporting Liebour policy?:Suspiciou Only Diane "Trust me" Abbott, who defied a Liebour three line whip over Brexit...and got away with it.....:Whatever_ You couldn't make it up...and still the socilaists on here support this crew...LOL |
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 12001891)
Owen Smith sacked for stating that he belives there should be a second referendum.:thumb:
And who pops up to defend Jezza Flip-Flop-Man, saying that there should be no place on the front bench for anyone not supporting Liebour policy?:Suspiciou Only Diane "Trust me" Abbott, who defied a Liebour three line whip over Brexit...and got away with it.....:Whatever_ You couldn't make it up...and still the socilaists on here support this crew...LOL |
You couldn't make it up...and still the socilaists on here support this crew...LOL Well, ten according to your poll last year: https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...-election.html I think maybe the folk you are inferring to are/were Liberal voters now these are quite vocal members with a almost Northern like stubbornness (which is quite commendable for shandy drinking southerners). |
LOL at the deafening silence from all the lefties on here.
|
The're busy in their local town centre wearing a parody t-shirt depicting Corbyn as Che Guevara standing on a soap box waving a home made placard and shouting "For the many, not the few!"
Hopefully a local will throw a can of Skol filled with p*ss at them. :thumb: |
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 12002008)
LOL at the deafening silence from all the lefties on here.
|
Not at all, oh leftie one.
Just not surprised at how little rancour there is when Liebour pull a stunt like this. But let the evil Tories do owt wrong and all the Remongs on here will be on crying....LOL |
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 12001891)
Owen Smith sacked for stating that he belives there should be a second referendum.:thumb:
And who pops up to defend Jezza Flip-Flop-Man, saying that there should be no place on the front bench for anyone not supporting Liebour policy?:Suspiciou Only Diane "Trust me" Abbott, who defied a Liebour three line whip over Brexit...and got away with it.....:Whatever_ You couldn't make it up...and still the socilaists on here support this crew...LOL |
Oh aye, forgot about that. Eeeeuuuuwww.
|
Hypocritical,lying,self-serving politician!
SHOCK,HORROR!! |
lol, liebour will try anything to get into power, they even promised free money at the last election and still couldn't win. The whole party needs a revamp, they have a leader that will never win an election, a party that doesn't support the leader in any strength and are trying to win elections with promises only the young and naive will believe is actually possible. They would ruin the country.
|
Yep...but they will probably get in, because the Tories are under-estimating just how dishonest Liebour are.
|
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 12002221)
Yep...but they will probably get in, because the Tories are under-estimating just how dishonest Liebour are.
|
Originally Posted by Tidgy
(Post 12002184)
lol, liebour will try anything to get into power, they even promised free money at the last election and still couldn't win. The whole party needs a revamp, they have a leader that will never win an election, a party that doesn't support the leader in any strength and are trying to win elections with promises only the young and naive will believe is actually possible. They would ruin the country.
|
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12002244)
Neither Labour or Tories are currently fit to govern.
Used to be MP's represented their constituents, now they represent their parties. |
yep.
Our present incompetent was local council leader, as well as lecturer at a 6th form college. He then gives up being leader because it's sooooo important to be vice principal. A few years later he gives up the council and politics as it's sooooooooo important to be principal:rolleyes: And yes, you guessed it, gave THAT up as it was soooooooooooooooo important to be MP and represent the local people. Then what does he do on being elected? Takes a position as a party whip...so he can now represent the party, not us. The utter, utter b@stard! |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12002244)
Neither Labour or Tories are currently fit to govern.
|
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 12002268)
So who would you put in place?
|
Originally Posted by Tidgy
(Post 12002184)
liebour ... are trying to win elections with promises only the young and naive will believe is actually possible
|
Originally Posted by Jonnys3
(Post 12002276)
And that is cause for great concern given the impact it had at the last election.
Successive governments have screwed over young people, someone offers them something, then all of sudden it's a 'cause for great concern' |
Well, only if what was offered was mostly a lie?
And get off the pensioners' case. We PAID for our pensions, it's not a gift you know? |
Originally Posted by alcazar
(Post 12002283)
Well, only if what was offered was mostly a lie?
And get off the pensioners' case. We PAID for our pensions, it's not a gift you know? I'm not 'on the case' of pensioners, I'm just pointing out that they've been offered something really good because they represent a powerful voting block. |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12002280)
How about the Tories buying off an even bigger voting demographic with 'triple locked' pensions?
Successive governments have screwed over young people, someone offers them something, then all of sudden it's a 'cause for great concern' |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12002287)
No your pension is paid for by people currently paying tax. When you worked you were paying the pensions of those (at the time) retired. It's the way the system works.
|
Originally Posted by Tidgy
(Post 12002289)
Because its unrealistic and would bankrupt the country to do it, yet young people are too naive to realise the reality we are in.
But to claim that changing back to the old system would 'bankrupt the country' is also pretty naive. |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12002292)
I agree with the change in University funding, I think it's a more sustainable system.
But to claim that changing back to the old system would 'bankrupt the country' is also pretty naive. our whole university systems is flawed anyway, no one stops to ask 'does everyone have the intelligence and drive to get a degree worth the paper its printed on?' they just keep admitting more and more people. |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12002287)
No your pension is paid for by people currently paying tax. When you worked you were paying the pensions of those (at the time) retired. It's the way the system works.
I'm not 'on the case' of pensioners, I'm just pointing out that they've been offered something really good because they represent a powerful voting block. As you say, and despite arguments to the contrary, the state pension is alive and well and thriving because no government would dare to touch it for fear of instantly become 'the previous government'. Pensioners vote, young people don't. |
Originally Posted by Tidgy
(Post 12002296)
So where does the xxxx extra millions come from?
our whole university systems is flawed anyway, no one stops to ask 'does everyone have the intelligence and drive to get a degree worth the paper its printed on?' they just keep admitting more and more people. |
Originally Posted by Martin2005
(Post 12002299)
From the same place the extra £6bn a year the additional cost of 'the triple lock' does?
or are you saying kids should get free uni rather than increase in pension? |
Originally Posted by Tidgy
(Post 12002301)
given how many people are struggling to pay the bills when they retire how would you suggest thast sorted out?
or are you saying kids should get free uni rather than increase in pension? You're the one who only seems to deal in absolutes, Labour= bad, Tories = good, young people = bad, old people = good etc. Which again (and to coin your current favourite word) is naive |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:32 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands