ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum

ScoobyNet.com - Subaru Enthusiast Forum (https://www.scoobynet.com/)
-   ScoobyNet General (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/)
-   -   Kinugawa Turbo Hype!! (https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-general-1/990109-kinugawa-turbo-hype.html)

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 09:36 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895479)
damn thats laggy :o

NOt that bad realy heres my SC42 hat had been fitted to my Blob STI


https://cimg0.ibsrv.net/gimg/www.sco...fc23d5874c.jpg

On-the-bog 17 November 2016 09:41 AM

Ah just re-read it, thought it was on a 2.5.

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 09:46 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895485)
Ah just re-read it, thought it was on a 2.5.

I think that last graph was on a 2.5 actually so yea i thought a 2.5 would wake it up earlier,

sorry mate it's me who can't read :lol1:

Ste333 17 November 2016 09:49 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895479)
damn thats laggy :o

well it is a 25G I suppose :) interesting to see the numbers though

boosted 17 November 2016 09:55 AM

add my bit here, I have a cheap Chinese eBay 20g that was £125 band new with 1 year warranty.
Must be doing the business as my full weight newage (1500kg with driver) does consistent 12.3's with it, so circa 380hp.
I love all the tubro snobbery

On-the-bog 17 November 2016 10:00 AM


Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy (Post 11895486)
I think that last graph was on a 2.5 actually so yea i thought a 2.5 would wake it up earlier,

sorry mate it's me who can't read :lol1:

ah i re-re-read and yeah rb5 with s forged 2.5 hahaha.

So statement stands, I'd expect it to be 1000 rpm earlier to full torque so very very laggy

On-the-bog 17 November 2016 10:01 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895490)
add my bit here, I have a cheap Chinese eBay 20g that was £125 band new with 1 year warranty.
Must be doing the business as my full weight newage (1500kg with driver) does consistent 12.3's with it, so circa 380hp.
I love all the tubro snobbery

It's nothing to do with snobbery at all, its to do with best results of spool vs power.

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:03 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895495)
ah i re-re-read and yeah rb5 with s forged 2.5 hahaha.

So statement stands, I'd expect it to be 1000 rpm earlier to full torque so very very laggy

Agree,

Would've been acceptable had it been on a 2.0 would expect over 400 ft/lbs from a built 2.5,

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:05 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895490)
add my bit here, I have a cheap Chinese eBay 20g that was £125 band new with 1 year warranty.
Must be doing the business as my full weight newage (1500kg with driver) does consistent 12.3's with it, so circa 380hp.
I love all the tubro snobbery

Can we see a graph for this cheapo turbo ;)

or is it a guestimate ?

If it's doing those times who cares what brand it is :)

On-the-bog 17 November 2016 10:10 AM

For comparison, all pulling considerably more power and spool

https://www.scoobynet.com/799025-sco...l#post10499895

post 3554

even outspooled by a 2.0

https://www.scoobynet.com/799025-sco...etter-126.html

post 3761

boosted 17 November 2016 10:15 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895496)
It's nothing to do with snobbery at all, its to do with best results of spool vs power.

Full boost 1.6 bar by 2800rpm, 1.5 bar held to 6500+

Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy (Post 11895498)
Can we see a graph for this cheapo turbo ;)

or is it a guestimate ?

If it's doing those times who cares what brand it is :)

It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road. Power isn't important, the speed of the car is what matters

On-the-bog 17 November 2016 10:22 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895501)
Full boost 1.6 bar by 2800rpm, 1.5 bar held to 6500+

It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road. Power isn't important, the speed of the car is what matters

Maybe yours is (got a dyno graph for comparison, spool is typically later on a dyno). But every turbo performs differently on different cars not to mention you may have got one that is decent.

I shall explain, cheap knockoffs tend to have much larger tolerances, however that doesn't mean 1 in 1000 can't be a good match and tolerances be very tight, so it performs ok.

boosted 17 November 2016 10:31 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895502)
Maybe yours is (got a dyno graph for comparison, spool is typically later on a dyno). But every turbo performs differently on different cars not to mention you may have got one that is decent.

I shall explain, cheap knockoffs tend to have much larger tolerances, however that doesn't mean 1 in 1000 can't be a good match and tolerances be very tight, so it performs ok.

Tolerance of which part?
I have had four engines and Seven tubros on my Impreza in 3 years, this is the fastest.
I have owned and ran 8 cheap Chinese turbos over the years all with good results (from escorts, sierras, BMW, golf, two impreza's) also ran genuine garretts, holsets and mhi tubros.

scooby2.5maz 17 November 2016 10:31 AM


Originally Posted by Ste333 (Post 11895488)
well it is a 25G I suppose :) interesting to see the numbers though

He obviously hasn't driven enough . He also needs to realise it's on stock wrx heads , non avcs . Also it ain't a £1500 turbo but £500 turbo :thumb::cuckoo:

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:31 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895501)
Full boost 1.6 bar by 2800rpm, 1.5 bar held to 6500+

It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road. Power isn't important, the speed of the car is what matters

Is there any proof of this ?

Full boost on a 2.0 by 2800rpm ?

or is it a 2.5 ?

Be nice to see a graph to compare

Ste333 17 November 2016 10:32 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895501)
It's does 12.3's, 379bhp is the power required to do those times with 1500kg. That's more accurate than a rolling road.

That's very specific...how do you come to that calculation? Not taking the piss, just generally out of interest :idea:

boosted 17 November 2016 10:33 AM


Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy (Post 11895507)
Is there any proof of this ?

Full boost on a 2.0 by 2800rpm ?

or is it a 2.5 ?

Be nice to see a graph to compare

2.5 9:1 compression. Proof of what?

boosted 17 November 2016 10:34 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by Ste333 (Post 11895508)
That's very specific...how do you come to that calculation? Not taking the piss, just generally out of interest :idea:

Torqstats never lies.....
Attachment 28849

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:36 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895510)
2.5 9:1 compression. Proof of what?

Proof of the power the spool any of these claims lol ?

Not doubting just always good to see a timeslip/dyno graph/datalog ?

So its a fully forged higher compression 2.5 ?

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:37 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895511)

Those apps are bull**** tbh,

What about transmission losses and the thousands of other variables ?

Id say give or take 10%

boosted 17 November 2016 10:38 AM

1 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy (Post 11895512)
Proof of the power the spool any of these claims lol ?

Not doubting just always good to see a timeslip/dyno graph/datalog ?

So its a fully forged higher compression 2.5 ?

Yeah, 2.5 with wrx heads, 8.9:1 compression and a 7cm cast 20g.
Attachment 28848

On-the-bog 17 November 2016 10:39 AM

uh target calculator says 417bhp, its only when you put it in the calculated time (1500kg and 379bhp) is says 12.3.

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:39 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895514)
Yeah, 2.5 with wrx heads, 8.9:1 compression and a 7cm cast 20g.
http://i959.photobucket.com/albums/a...psd6h2miti.png


Fook me did you do those times at Crail ? :eek:

boosted 17 November 2016 10:40 AM


Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy (Post 11895513)
Those apps are bull**** tbh,

What about transmission losses and the thousands of other variables ?

Id say give or take 10%

Are they really?! What about said descepencies with a RR? It's all relative and all educated guesswork.
However the weight and times don't lie....

boosted 17 November 2016 10:40 AM


Originally Posted by SmurfyBhoy (Post 11895516)
Fook me did you do those times at Crail ? :eek:

Yep, best bit is I mapped the car myself with a megasquirt

boosted 17 November 2016 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895515)
uh target calculator says 417bhp, its only when you put it in the calculated time (1500kg and 379bhp) is says 12.3.

Use dragstrip time not 1/4 mile

On-the-bog 17 November 2016 10:41 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895517)
Are they really?! What about said descepencies with a RR? It's all relative and all educated guesswork.
However the weight and times don't lie....

in this case there's no benchmark times to compare the turbo's, hence the dyno benchmark, which while are slightly varying, decent dyno's typicly show results very similar.

Also were talking about spool here anyway so dyno would be the like for like.

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:44 AM

I thought a fully loaded newage oiled and fueled was closer to 1600kg,

SmurfyBhoy 17 November 2016 10:45 AM


Originally Posted by boosted (Post 11895518)
Yep, best bit is I mapped the car myself with a megasquirt

Prob go even quicker elsewhere,

I suspect you have a fair chunk of torque to go with "only" 380 ish bhp,

Guessing well over 400Ftlbs 420 ish even

boosted 17 November 2016 10:47 AM


Originally Posted by On-the-bog (Post 11895520)
in this case there's no benchmark times to compare the turbo's, hence the dyno benchmark, which while are slightly varying, decent dyno's typicly show results very similar.

Also were talking about spool here anyway so dyno would be the like for like.

Of course dyno spool is BS anyway... road is where it counts.
I had a genuine evo3 big 16g on my 2.0l before the 2.5, it spooled about 3800 and couldn't hold boost up the top...
20g was spooling at 2800 and dropping like a stone too until I discovered an inlet pipe restriction... now it holds boost all the way. Can only assume this was the problem with the previous setup too. My point being let's not be too quick to blame the tubro. Chinese or not.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:15 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands