Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

less is more...Elise principle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 April 2013, 10:00 PM
  #1  
lozgti1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
lozgti1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,916
Received 71 Likes on 57 Posts
Default less is more...Elise principle

Just reading Evo,Letters page and article on various Lotus Elises all got me thinking

I'm sick of all technology.Flappy paddles and drivers aids.Bluetooth as selling Point,sport And eco buttons etc

Just like Colin Chapman's principle.Just need rev counter,Speedo,seats,etc.New cars are just becoming less and less appealing

What do you prefer? All your gizmos or simple stuff ?

Take me back to the 80's please!
Old 24 April 2013, 11:27 PM
  #2  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lozgti1
Just reading Evo,Letters page and article on various Lotus Elises all got me thinking

I'm sick of all technology.Flappy paddles and drivers aids.Bluetooth as selling Point,sport And eco buttons etc

Just like Colin Chapman's principle.Just need rev counter,Speedo,seats,etc.New cars are just becoming less and less appealing

What do you prefer? All your gizmos or simple stuff ?

Take me back to the 80's please!
It is getting silly. Take a BMW - another owner won't ask you what engine it's got, they'll ask you what options you have.

What's happened to weight? Why do people forget that complex stuff breaks expensively and much of it distracts you?

An Elise has no space but I like the idea of simply stuff that works. Also look at 4WD land - the ONLY simply 4x4 you can buy is a Land Rover Defender which sadly, breaks down a lot. A neighbour has an old Daihatsu Fourtrak - totally bombproof, goes anywhere. If you don't want LR, you have to get some completely "luxuried" up massive thing weighing 2.5 tonnes++ or that is just crap off road.
Old 25 April 2013, 08:15 AM
  #3  
richs2891
Scooby Regular
 
richs2891's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There does need to be a balance, There is a lot of unnecessary things in cars eg , things like electric adjustment seats and electric steering columns - (a personal hate of mine as utter waster of time, as I set them once and never adjust them). Air cooled leather seats, the list goes on,
Standard sat nav - never found one that better for features and easier to upgrade than an £100 Tom Tom, just give me a point where I can slot a normal sat nav in and a phone mount and I would be happy. Multi point traction control - just on and off for me, traction control on a 4x4 - now that makes me laugh - give me a lockable lsd any day. Will you see the current Range Rover or Disco with all its electronics in 15 / 20 years time going around a 4x4 pay and play site - I doubt it as all the electronics will have broke !

Richard
Old 25 April 2013, 10:22 AM
  #4  
Paullen
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Paullen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Poole
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A bit more controversial, but what about all the safety features? Crash bars, ABS, air bags etc
Old 25 April 2013, 10:51 AM
  #5  
grahamc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
grahamc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,800
Received 21 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Although I do understand where you are coming from...... And I will run a "drivers" car alongside the GTR, I do like the gadgets.
Old 25 April 2013, 11:06 AM
  #6  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I'd go back to my MkI Escort Mexico tomorrow....or better still, the Lotus Cortina I had. The induction roar from a pair of Webber 40 DCOE's is to die for, forget your burble......

I really always wanted a Twin Cam Escort, too, but never got one.
Old 25 April 2013, 11:08 AM
  #7  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I owned an S1 Elise for 3 years and never have I been in a car that felt more in touch with the road. As a driving for fun tool it was superb, but as a method of getting from A to B it sucked. It was hard to get in and out of, had no room anywhere and was impossibly noisy ..... I loved it, but was glad it was a second car.

I did get to test its crash worthiness at first hand though. I was hit by a suspected drunk driver who drove off despite the front of his car being mashed. He spun me into a dry stone wall. I hit the wall with the front and back of the Elise twice each end and ended up 90 degrees across the road on a dark wet November night. I walked away unscathed but the Elise was a writee off. Two of the brake disc even cracked in half as did two of the alloys. A sad day, but to be honest I had had my fill by then. Bought an Integra Type R next.... that was a brilliant car

Trending Topics

Old 25 April 2013, 12:44 PM
  #8  
ATWRX
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
ATWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Up North
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fully with the OP here, I love my Scoob, ABS and air bags to keep me safe, no Traction Control and everything else is pretty basic, it's about as raw as you can find these days.
I had a TVR Cerbera, which I would have back tomorrow, it didn't break down and was just an amazing car, although it was a weekend car, I tried to use it as much as I could.
It was loud, brash, unforgiving, raw and an absolute hoot to drive, even at low speeds through town. Again, no real comforts, no air bag, no abs, no tc, just leather seats, a heating system that worked and a long throttle to control the power (That was TVR's traction control system, a throttle that was about 36" long ), but it was just amazing and an occasion to drive every time you got in it.

Last edited by ATWRX; 25 April 2013 at 12:45 PM.
Old 25 April 2013, 01:55 PM
  #9  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

funnily enough got my Caterham thingy out the last weekend for the first blast of the summer

it does have a cigarette lighter, but no doors, fantastic (although I don't smoke)
Old 25 April 2013, 02:01 PM
  #10  
LSherratt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
LSherratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: On a farm
Posts: 3,379
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Me being fairly young, I haven't ever experienced a "proper drivers" car so I do not have anything to compare to, and I doubt I ever will.

All this technology and electronics is the new way to drive. But I understand what you lot are saying.

You guys are all old farts
Old 27 April 2013, 08:59 PM
  #11  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run a Mk2 Golf 16V as my every day car, what are these 'gizmos' you speak of

Back in those days, VW (and Peugeot with the 205) were perfectly happy to make you pay extra even for power steering
Old 27 April 2013, 09:19 PM
  #12  
riiidaa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
riiidaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Near Croydon
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if my classic had proximity entry and start, I'd not complain.
Old 28 April 2013, 12:11 PM
  #13  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

I drove a Westfield SEi last week and realised there are limits to the less is more theory:

Yes I could grab a road wheel and easily lift a rear wheel clean off the ground (not the front as it has a pig-iron Pinto engine ). But...it was a little too OTT to be used as a daily driver....certainly needed a few mod cons, like doors, a heater, maybe a roof and boot too.

It has to be said though that things are going too far....Our 530GT was purchased for mile munching comfort to drive across Europe and still have space for a loads of luggage (point to note - the runflat tyres work OK in France and Spain...no potholes ). It does 40+mpg, it does 0-60 in 6.7 seconds. BUT it weights just shy of 2000kg!!!! And it handles and brakes like it..that's not to say it doesn't handle...it does handle well, its also not to say it doesn't stop...it does. Until...you reach the limits of grip and realise you have two tons to stop or change direction - Not good, hence its never driven in fury...its just too over-assisted and devoid of feel in terms of forces the chassis is going through. I just keep wondering...how good this car could be if it was 700kg lighter?

Oddly, my old Jag XJ-s a car iconically criticised by the motoring press and public for being too detached to drive yet has far more feel than many modern cars. OK I have a RS steering rack and later specification shocks/dampers (basically what is known as sports pack, as all current genuine or OE spec replacement parts for old XJs are now of sports pack spec), but essentially the rest of the car is unchanged.

The steering loads up when cornering hard, its also very precise - no wooliness or vagueness (a common Jag criticism). The brakes are firm, a nice hard pedal that is very proportional to effort. Even the accelerator pedal feels proportional. This is all from a car that weighs close to 1700kg and was always regarded as a barge! Yet it just feels more attached to drive than a brand new 5 series!! Same with new Jag XFs and Mercs E classes with their spongy over-assisted brakes and dis-proportionate steering.

I also drove a Rover Metro GTi last week. Wow, a rare beast! No don't laugh, it was mint...30,000miles from new. I used to hate Metros for generally being rusty death traps, but now I'm wondering, there was nothing wrong with the way these cars drove, in fact it reminded how bad small cars are now, just if only they were safe in a crash....if MCC could make a Smart Fortwo safe(ish). All Rover had to do was use better quality metal and construction? A bit more weight, but not much if done right.

Definitely the sporty "super minis" of today are anything but...the Suzuki Swift is the closest I driven, but it still felt heavier and not so spritely as a 21 year old Metro! But then it is 250 odd kg heavier with a engine bogged down to comply with a load of emission/mpg crap.
Old 28 April 2013, 12:18 PM
  #14  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paullen
A bit more controversial, but what about all the safety features? Crash bars, ABS, air bags etc

I liked Alec Issigonis's view.....it you had a car that handled and stopped well...you could AVOID accidents

He was right...to a point. The Mini didn't exactly have a glowing safety record
Old 28 April 2013, 05:06 PM
  #15  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paullen
A bit more controversial, but what about all the safety features? Crash bars, ABS, air bags etc
Well, I used to think that.

My Exige had no power steering, but thank **** for the airbag and side impact bar....

http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/h...8/P7010348.jpg

...without those, I may still be aching at best!

So for me, I'd like to keep them.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mitchy260
Drivetrain
14
23 February 2004 05:22 AM
Felix.
Non Scooby Related
13
20 January 2004 09:56 PM
fast bloke
Non Scooby Related
2
26 February 2003 03:05 PM



Quick Reply: less is more...Elise principle



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:33 AM.