Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Leo-RS why is the bmw faster once rolling?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07 April 2012, 09:33 PM
  #1  
SPIDERWRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
SPIDERWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 335i LAND
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Leo-RS why is the bmw faster once rolling?

Audi RS3 Sportback v BMW 1 Series M Coupe Drag Race - Auto Express

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UGdz...39RVAAAAAAAAAQ



Leo-RS why is the bmw faster once rolling?

must be the 4wd slowing it down
Old 07 April 2012, 10:39 PM
  #2  
LEO-RS
Scooby Regular
 
LEO-RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No idea fella but those times from both cars are shocking. Other independent tests have put the RS3 sub 4 and sub 10 with low to mid 12's 1/4. Not sure if they used launch control in that video, didn't look like it or sound like it to me.

On the move there will be bugger all between the 2 cars to be honest. Both similar power and weight. Toss a coin.

Probably the worst set of figures I have seen from both cars though. Not really a fan of the RS3, practical yes, a lot of money for an outdated model though.

Last edited by LEO-RS; 07 April 2012 at 10:41 PM.
Old 07 April 2012, 10:47 PM
  #3  
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Terminator X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1M for me given the choice, just look at it

TX.
Old 07 April 2012, 10:52 PM
  #4  
SPIDERWRX
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
SPIDERWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 335i LAND
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

cheers for the fast post, the Audi much have more transmission losses than the bmw
Old 08 April 2012, 12:48 PM
  #5  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thought they would be faster over a quarter mile, I was expecting them to be like three or four seconds quicker than my 944 which is meant to do it in 14.7. I suspect the Audi if driven properly and remapped will be a lot quicker than 13.6.
Old 08 April 2012, 02:14 PM
  #6  
LEO-RS
Scooby Regular
 
LEO-RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Dundee
Posts: 446
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Top Gear test between RS3 an 1M, completely different picture.

http://www.1addicts.com/forums/attac...7&d=1308219295

0-60 in 3.8 /4.5
0-100 in 9.9 /10.7
1/4m in 12.4 /13

So even taking launch out of it, 60-100 is 6.1 for RS3 vs 6.2 for 1M, like i said in my previous post, identical on the move. Nothing to do with transmission losses, new age quattros are primarily fwd on the move with less than 15% lost through transmission. Also 1M is a 3.0 engine vs Audi's 2.5

Last edited by LEO-RS; 08 April 2012 at 02:20 PM.
Old 08 April 2012, 02:16 PM
  #7  
richs2891
Scooby Regular
 
richs2891's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mmm not sure if the Audi's transmission losses would be that much more than the BMW, as if its anythihg like my old S3 it effectively front wheel drive and only 4wd when it needs it.
Yes I'm aware that the axle will be rotating to the rear diff, but the rear diff will be disabled when not needed.
I feel the differance will be more to do with gearing than anything else.

Richard
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
04 October 2015 09:49 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
the shreksta
Other Marques
26
01 October 2015 02:30 PM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
4
01 October 2015 11:37 AM
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
28 September 2015 07:05 AM



Quick Reply: Leo-RS why is the bmw faster once rolling?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:35 AM.