Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

New JDM Civic Type-R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 April 2007, 11:55 AM
  #1  
Fabioso
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fabioso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default New JDM Civic Type-R

What do you guys think of the new JDM Civic Type-R ? which is a saloon and looks nothing like our poorer European version.

The bullet points that got me interested :-
  • 0-60mph times around 5 seconds and a top speed of over 150mph
  • A full second faster around the famous Tsukuba circuit than the previous Integra Type-R and within a second of the NSX’s lap record
  • Brembos all round and a LSD
Would just love that in say blue or silver with the grey alloys.......I bet you wouldn't see many on the roads here

Just got to find myself £24k from somewhere..........

Info is here :-

Litchfield Imports
Old 22 April 2007, 12:39 PM
  #2  
richs2891
Scooby Regular
 
richs2891's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Please excuse my Spelling - its not the best !!
Posts: 2,538
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Saw this last week and I like it - personally think would look good in black with the 1/2 red / black interior ! Good Q car as most people would not know what it was !
Bit pricey though !

Richard
Old 22 April 2007, 12:48 PM
  #3  
paulwrxboro
Scooby Regular
 
paulwrxboro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cant spell WGAF
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looks very nice id buy one
Old 22 April 2007, 01:02 PM
  #4  
super6four
Scooby Regular
 
super6four's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Newera will do you one for a tad over £19k landed. Though of course they do not do finance. Still a bit of a saving.
Old 22 April 2007, 01:18 PM
  #5  
ScoobyDoo555
Scooby Regular
 
ScoobyDoo555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Does it matter?
Posts: 11,217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Now, I do quite like that
Old 22 April 2007, 01:37 PM
  #6  
Cyberevo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Cyberevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Warwick
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

225 bhp 0-60 in 5 with FWD, no chance.....
Old 22 April 2007, 01:43 PM
  #7  
bluenose172
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
bluenose172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^Agree!
Old 22 April 2007, 01:56 PM
  #8  
davecweed
Scooby Regular
 
davecweed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Agree as above, were back to silly high powered fwd cars, waste of time!
Old 22 April 2007, 02:23 PM
  #9  
Cyberevo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Cyberevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Warwick
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davecweed
Agree as above, were back to silly high powered fwd cars, waste of time!
Wrong, there is nothing wrong with 'silly' high powered FWD cars, my DC5 is running over 250 and it is fine, I'm just stating that it will not reach 60 in 5 due to lack of traction.
Old 22 April 2007, 03:25 PM
  #10  
davecweed
Scooby Regular
 
davecweed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cyberevo
Wrong, there is nothing wrong with 'silly' high powered FWD cars, my DC5 is running over 250 and it is fine, I'm just stating that it will not reach 60 in 5 due to lack of traction.
any sign of damp/wet roads u are going to get wheel spin!, true?

if there is nothing wrong with high powered fwd cars, then why arent all the supercar makers, producing fwd supercars??

Think about dude!
Old 22 April 2007, 04:02 PM
  #11  
AudiLover
Scooby Regular
 
AudiLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A sorted 200hp FWD car is more fun than the average 350hp 4wd car.
Old 22 April 2007, 04:34 PM
  #12  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.

Audilover - Please point out an 'average' 350BHP 4wd car, not seen one myself

a well driven 350bhp 4wd car would be a more interesting and rewarding a drive over a 200bhp fwd car!

Having driven a variety of rwd/fwd and 4wd cars including some hypercars, above 250bhp+ through the front wheels is an exercise in futility unless you are an incredible driver - which most people are not!
Old 22 April 2007, 05:08 PM
  #13  
MooseRacer
Scooby Regular
 
MooseRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cyberevo
225 bhp 0-60 in 5 with FWD, no chance.....
Honda have produced a 1.6 FWD car (funnily enough a Civic) that'll do 0-60 in 5secs so don't see why this should be any different.
Old 22 April 2007, 05:15 PM
  #14  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MooseRacer
Honda have produced a 1.6 FWD car (funnily enough a Civic) that'll do 0-60 in 5secs so don't see why this should be any different.
not familar with this, can you produce more info on it.

I have had two civic VTI's a 1.6 and a 1.8 and both great cars and with excellent handling BTW
Old 22 April 2007, 05:17 PM
  #15  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Paul he is referring to the EK9 civic type r, which Honda claimed would do 0-60 in 5.7 secs from its 185ps 1.6 engine.

Banny
Old 22 April 2007, 05:41 PM
  #16  
MooseRacer
Scooby Regular
 
MooseRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
Paul he is referring to the EK9 civic type r, which Honda claimed would do 0-60 in 5.7 secs from its 185ps 1.6 engine.

Banny
And I believe was tested by EVO at 5.9 to 60
Old 22 April 2007, 05:47 PM
  #17  
Fabioso
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Fabioso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd settle for sub 6.0 tbh 5.9 will do easily pleased me.....

I think it looks less garish than the UK Civic Type-R hatch and if it wasn't quite so pricey I would def consider one cos its going to be more "exclusive" than most of the models on the road.

Like the idea of people seeing the Honda badge which they recognise but following it with a "What the hell is that ?"
Old 22 April 2007, 06:02 PM
  #18  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has a VXResque look about it but is very handsome.
Old 22 April 2007, 06:58 PM
  #19  
jeremy
Scooby Regular
 
jeremy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Any1 know what Honda have done with this JDM
chassis? Seam wealds? New suspension?
Old 22 April 2007, 07:03 PM
  #20  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Mmm, same shape as the USDM Civic Hybrid I'm driving at the moment.

Old 22 April 2007, 07:21 PM
  #21  
Cyberevo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Cyberevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Warwick
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davecweed
any sign of damp/wet roads u are going to get wheel spin!, true?

if there is nothing wrong with high powered fwd cars, then why arent all the supercar makers, producing fwd supercars??

Think about dude!
Supercar markers perfer RWD, not front or 4, hence Honda went rear for their NSX, plus with a LSP things are not too bad in the wet, as long as you are easy on the throttle, again you have to show so called 'supercars' respect in the wet, so what was you point again?
Old 22 April 2007, 08:24 PM
  #22  
davecweed
Scooby Regular
 
davecweed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cyberevo
Supercar markers perfer RWD, not front or 4, hence Honda went rear for their NSX, plus with a LSP things are not too bad in the wet, as long as you are easy on the throttle, again you have to show so called 'supercars' respect in the wet, so what was you point again?
you are asking the front wheels to steer and power the car, your asking to much, thats why they understeer like hell, u only need watch topgear to see that, with vxr astra and vxr vectra, and others

wake up dude, and smell the rose's!
Old 22 April 2007, 09:01 PM
  #23  
AudiLover
Scooby Regular
 
AudiLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
.

Audilover - Please point out an 'average' 350BHP 4wd car, not seen one myself

a well driven 350bhp 4wd car would be a more interesting and rewarding a drive over a 200bhp fwd car!

Having driven a variety of rwd/fwd and 4wd cars including some hypercars, above 250bhp+ through the front wheels is an exercise in futility unless you are an incredible driver - which most people are not!
Id rather drive about enthusiastically in a well engineered fwd hot hatch on public roads than say a 320hp EVO.

Quite frankly its too dangerous and rather stupid anyway to be able to push a monster like the evo to its limits without being a great risk to the general public.

On the racetrack I will take the Evo though anyday.
Old 22 April 2007, 09:18 PM
  #24  
Cyberevo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Cyberevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Warwick
Posts: 734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davecweed
you are asking the front wheels to steer and power the car, your asking to much, thats why they understeer like hell, u only need watch topgear to see that, with vxr astra and vxr vectra, and others

wake up dude, and smell the rose's!
My DC5 does not understeer like hell, in fact it drives rather well, you just need to apply the power a bit more slowly, like you would in a high powered RWD car, otherwise you would be smelling the roses.
Old 22 April 2007, 09:34 PM
  #25  
Dark Blue Mark
Scooby Regular
 
Dark Blue Mark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dave, I think people latched onto the Top Gear "220 bhp is the limit for FWD" and took it as gospel.

When you have a car with as well sorted a chassis and LSD as a DC2 or DC5, they dont torque steer and they can easily cope with more power. They have very good LSD's which a lot of FWD cars dont have (such as the CTR)

I think you have to drive one rather than go off people's opinions...

Or we best go tell all those TOCA boys their cars are driven by the worng set of wheels!
Old 22 April 2007, 09:37 PM
  #26  
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
jameswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 6,535
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Id rather drive about enthusiastically in a well engineered fwd hot hatch on public roads than say a 320hp EVO.
Pansy
Old 22 April 2007, 10:40 PM
  #27  
super6four
Scooby Regular
 
super6four's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can get away with decent power through the front wheels, of course may not be ideal. But you can do it and get control. Of course one of the advantages of the N/A Hondas is the fact that you are not strugling with the torque you'd get with a blown FWD car.

It is the torque that kills the drivability of cars such as the VXR and GTA say, at least for ordinary mortals like me.

I do agree 5 secs is a tad optamistic with the specs of that car however, even with the close gearing it is bound to have.

Out of interest I managed a 5.65 to 60 at brunters with J Tuner mag on a group thrash with my CTR, and it had a fair chunk more BHP than the new JDM car. Around 260. Though 'only' having 169lbs of torque helped with the controlability. That was when I was running a 4psi Jackson kit.

I am now back to all motor and am still getting 238 break and 171lbs. Though the torque band is narrower. I am going to Brunters again this Friday, be interesting to see how she compares.

Last edited by super6four; 22 April 2007 at 10:42 PM.
Old 23 April 2007, 12:38 AM
  #28  
chris n`nic
Scooby Regular
 
chris n`nic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 5.39 0-60 14.1 @ 97mph...well it is only a clio ;)
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Should do well m8. I have had my Clio timed at 5.39 0-60 with std tyres and at the time high 180`s bhp. Only rear seats removed. If you have a lot of power surely using a bit of throttle control would help...just cause you might have silly power doesn't mean you have to use it all when setting off?

Chris
Old 24 April 2007, 11:53 AM
  #29  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davecweed
you are asking the front wheels to steer and power the car, your asking to much, thats why they understeer like hell, u only need watch topgear to see that, with vxr astra and vxr vectra, and others

wake up dude, and smell the rose's!
Like this 240bhp Citroen AX that pisses all over the Evo at Knockhill? I don't spot much understeer or wheelspin in this vid.

YouTube - AXO16V @ Knockhill

Set a FWD car up properly and it can match anything.
Old 24 April 2007, 07:33 PM
  #30  
davecweed
Scooby Regular
 
davecweed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
Like this 240bhp Citroen AX that pisses all over the Evo at Knockhill? I don't spot much understeer or wheelspin in this vid.

YouTube - AXO16V @ Knockhill

Set a FWD car up properly and it can match anything.
that proofs nothing dude!, the guy in the evo could be a slower driver, plus the the track was dry, if it was a wet track the evo would have pissed all over that saxo, if u put a good driver behind the wheel


Quick Reply: New JDM Civic Type-R



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:59 AM.