Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

Golf R32...how slow???!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:14 PM
  #1  
subaruwr1's Avatar
subaruwr1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Question Golf R32...how slow???!!!

Just had some fun with a Golf R32 on a PRIVATE dual carriageway with a few bends.I was in my Legacy Spec B ST and made it look very slow indeed.I thought they would have been faster and also he was useless around the bends.
Anyone know much or ever driven a Golf R32?
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #2  
theotherphil's Avatar
theotherphil
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 1
Default

Expect to be flamed by the bunny loving tree huggers
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #3  
subaruwr1's Avatar
subaruwr1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by theotherphil
Expect to be flamed by the bunny loving tree huggers

Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:29 PM
  #4  
Dark Knight's Avatar
Dark Knight
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Default

it might be a golf GTI with R32 bodykit....
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:30 PM
  #5  
wacky.banana's Avatar
wacky.banana
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,379
Likes: 1
Default

Sub,

I would google this and see what performance figures are quoted for the R32. AFAIK its an NA engine so I would expect its characteristics to be different to a turbo engine. I do think they are over hyped though, IMO.

Yes, agree with one of the posters on here, you will get slaughtered by the moral right on here in a minute for having fun on a PRIVATE dual carriageway.

WB
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:31 PM
  #6  
subaruwr1's Avatar
subaruwr1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by Dark Knight
it might be a golf GTI with R32 bodykit....
no, I am 100% sure it was the real thing.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #7  
cookstar's Avatar
cookstar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
From: Stroke it baby!
Default

Ive heard good things about these.

Do you think maybe he might have just been taking it easy, due to the fact it was on a (private) road.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:36 PM
  #8  
subaruwr1's Avatar
subaruwr1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by cookstar
Ive heard good things about these.

Do you think maybe he might have just been taking it easy, due to the fact it was on a (private) road.
Possibly.I was surpirsed at the relevent ease I passed him in a couple hundred yards but then again my spec B is no slouch.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:40 PM
  #9  
Gutmann pug's Avatar
Gutmann pug
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Default

driver
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:45 PM
  #10  
THOMO's Avatar
THOMO
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Default

i played with one with my old classic wrx i pulled away easily.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #11  
subaruwr1's Avatar
subaruwr1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by Gutmann pug
driver
thats my thought aswell but just wanted to ask what people thought of the golf as it looked the dogs.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:48 PM
  #12  
cookstar's Avatar
cookstar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
From: Stroke it baby!
Default

someone must have some performance figures to quote, I know you cant hold much to them but they would be interesting BHP 0-60 etc


Cookie
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #13  
subaruwr1's Avatar
subaruwr1
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by cookstar
someone must have some performance figures to quote, I know you cant hold much to them but they would be interesting BHP 0-60 etc


Cookie
found this article about them

near the bottom it mentions Scoobis

http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/car-reviews...2-2003551.html
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #14  
davedipster's Avatar
davedipster
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
From: Essex
Default

Googled...

R32
1512kg and 159bhp/ton
6.4sec 0-60mph
0-70mph fourth 5.8sec
0-100 16.3sec
237hp
236lb ftLb
3.2-litre V6

Nice car
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #15  
scooby_matt's Avatar
scooby_matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,938
Likes: 0
Default

They're not all they're cracked up to be in the performance stakes, but they are nice cars. The seats alone make the car worth having.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 05:23 PM
  #16  
agdodds's Avatar
agdodds
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by subaruwr1
Just had some fun with a Golf R32 on a PRIVATE dual carriageway with a few bends.I was in my Legacy Spec B ST and made it look very slow indeed.I thought they would have been faster and also he was useless around the bends.
Anyone know much or ever driven a Golf R32?

I have owned an r32 for about three months and had to sell it due to losing my job, I disagree with your race he mustnt have been trying I had 160mph out of my (standard)r32 I have now got a wrx 51 plate and lucky to get 140 from it,when I had my r I used to enjoy off the mark races with scoobs and if I could afford another r32 I would swap the wrx without even thinking twice. my advice to you would be to find a dealer that has one pretend to be interested in it and take it for a test drive you wont be dissapointed,out of the cars i have ever owned I honestly think the scoob is very overrated in all departments you might want to have a look on tyresmoke.net and look at some of the r32 posts on there.you also didnt mention wether your car is standard or not. sorry but that is just my opinion
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 05:45 PM
  #17  
pete P1's Avatar
pete P1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Default

only thing i would say to that agdodds, is that you are talking about the cream of the performance volkswagons, and your comparing it to a wrx, which no offence, but is not the cream of the subaru range. without wanting to sound offensive, maybe its you that should go to a subaru dealers and test drive the sti with ppp!!. may give a bit more of a closer comparison.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 05:48 PM
  #18  
phelpsa's Avatar
phelpsa
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 948
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

Originally Posted by davedipster
Googled...

R32
1512kg and 159bhp/ton
6.4sec 0-60mph
0-70mph fourth 5.8sec
0-100 16.3sec
237hp
236lb ftLb
3.2-litre V6

Nice car
So it gets to 70 faster than it gets to 60 ehh
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 05:49 PM
  #19  
jasonius's Avatar
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
From: Half way up
Default

Originally Posted by agdodds
I have owned an r32 for about three months and had to sell it due to losing my job, I disagree with your race he mustnt have been trying I had 160mph out of my (standard)r32 I have now got a wrx 51 plate and lucky to get 140 from it,when I had my r I used to enjoy off the mark races with scoobs and if I could afford another r32 I would swap the wrx without even thinking twice. my advice to you would be to find a dealer that has one pretend to be interested in it and take it for a test drive you wont be dissapointed,out of the cars i have ever owned I honestly think the scoob is very overrated in all departments you might want to have a look on tyresmoke.net and look at some of the r32 posts on there.you also didnt mention wether your car is standard or not. sorry but that is just my opinion
Fair comment given you're driving a std. bugeye wrx.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 07:13 PM
  #20  
agdodds's Avatar
agdodds
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jasonius
Fair comment given you're driving a std. bugeye wrx.
That is absolutely true you are right in what you say it is the best there is in golf terms and the sti ppp is best in subaru terms, but in the similarities of bhp r32 being approx 240 na engine and the bugeye approx 215 turbocharged engine the r is (imo) quicker but then if you go for the sti being engine enhanced to say 300bhp and the r32 engine enhanced stage 4 amd tuned also to 310 bhp they are fu***ng rapid cant remember the exact figures and times but something like 0-60 in 4.? seconds which I think is good for a n/a engine,I dont know wether I am a bit biased because I loved the r32 but the only way I think I will like the wrx is if I get it chipped change the zorst for a better sound, leather interior, brakes, then get it resprayed cos it is a bit shabby,all of which I have thought about but dont know wether it will be a big enough improvement to want to keep it, also im 35 years old and not a chav I am starting to feel a bit embarrased having it when you see 18 year old with a metal dustbin atached to the back of the car and can hear it from 3000miles away all of which is devaluing the scoob (which dont get me wrong is an ok car) I have had for 3 months at 11000 now is only worth 7500 so any of the chavs in my area can trade their scooters in and buy a one(Im going off on one arent I ? its an age thing and has nowt ot do with r32/subaru performances) to end it all the sti ppp is lovely I have driven one and yes quicker than my r was but cant justify the insurance costs bearing in mind I was only paying 400 for the vw
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 07:14 PM
  #21  
SPEN555's Avatar
SPEN555
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 3,828
Likes: 0
From: West Yorkshire
Default

Originally Posted by phelpsa
So it gets to 70 faster than it gets to 60 ehh
FPMSL!
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 07:26 PM
  #22  
davedipster's Avatar
davedipster
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,600
Likes: 0
From: Essex
Default

Originally Posted by phelpsa
So it gets to 70 faster than it gets to 60 ehh
You have won the special prize

It should be 50-70.
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #23  
Mitchy260's Avatar
Mitchy260
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Default

I think he meant 30-70
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 07:38 PM
  #24  
kingofturds's Avatar
kingofturds
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 17,376
Likes: 6
From: Zanzibar
Default

r36 out next year 3.6 L 280bhp that should be interesting
Reply
Old Aug 6, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #25  
lomaximus's Avatar
lomaximus
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Question

Originally Posted by kingofturds
r36 out next year 3.6 L 280bhp that should be interesting
Deffo can't wait to see that although it'll probably be way over weight!!! I think the golf needs to go on a diet!!!
My mate used to have a r32, your right guys it did look mean as! BUT in my P1 i used to run circles around it!!! lol i'd show you the videos but it won't let me post a link for some reason!! needless to say he now has a wr1 and not looked back! However why o why have they put 4 doors on the wr1!!!!! should be 2 and i don't care for the colour!! They should have kept the trend with sonic blue!!
Also does anyone else have a wr1 on here i was really dissappointed with the handling it understeers like a ****!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 12:15 PM
  #26  
GrollySTI's Avatar
GrollySTI
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Ex'e'er
Default

I've had an R32 and now own a STI PPP.

Personally, I much prefer the STI and would say that it feels much quicker (but then it should be).

However,the low down grunt of the R was awesome and made it effortless (and mechanically sympathetic) to get very quick getaways!
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 05:35 PM
  #27  
New_scooby_04's Avatar
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
From: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Default

Originally Posted by davedipster
Googled...

R32
1512kg and 159bhp/ton
6.4sec 0-60mph
0-70mph fourth 5.8sec
0-100 16.3sec
237hp
236lb ftLb
3.2-litre V6

Nice car
Didn't realise it was that heavy! Nice car though, and lets face it, it's not exactly slow!

NS04
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 06:26 PM
  #28  
ScoobyJawa's Avatar
ScoobyJawa
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
From: Hampshire
Default

Funny this thread should come up. I had one driving like an utter pr!ck behind me the other day, thought it was a GTi with a kit first but then saw the R32 badge.

Thing is, I was in my totally standard S14a 200SX, and the R32 was no faster at all, he was well annoyed. I'd get the initial gap, then he'd never pull it back and only did when he started breaking the speed limit when I wasn't and driving a metre off my boot, weaving about etc....
So I just stopped He was giving it all the mouth, signs, beeping, going bright red with anger etc, getting soooooo wound up - can't understand people like that, complete fool.

Was overall very underwhelmed with the car and its lack of pace, soon be slaying them with a few choice mods sitting in my garage
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 07:03 PM
  #29  
ForesterBoy's Avatar
ForesterBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Default

The R32 has sooooooooo much of a better image than the chav charriot scoob, not to mention the soooooo much better build quality etc.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2005 | 07:08 PM
  #30  
leonpoole's Avatar
leonpoole
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
From: Teesside
Default

R32's are over priced for what they are and not super fast. Personally i'd buy a V5 golf for less money and not a great deal less performance
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:54 AM.