Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

CRV-Rav4-SORENTO-FORESTER-FREELANDER

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 October 2004, 07:40 AM
  #1  
drkuthan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
drkuthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default CRV-Rav4-SORENTO-FORESTER-FREELANDER

I live in Turkey and an pleasent driver of the 05 wrx

I am planning to buy a mid-priced suv that wont cost too much
So between these which one would you chose and why ?

Honda CRV
Toyota RAV4
Kia SORENTO
Subaru FORESTER
Landrover FREELANDER
Old 28 October 2004, 09:44 AM
  #2  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Petrol or diesel?

How much and how serious off-road? Use in snow much?

How many miles/km per year?

I chose a Rav4 as I wanted a reliable diesel family car that wasn't very long and wouldn't go off-road and drove well on-road. Your needs may well be different.
Old 28 October 2004, 10:13 AM
  #3  
drkuthan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
drkuthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All i want is good handling, performance and the looks that turn heads
doesn't matter petrol or diesel.

Please help
Old 28 October 2004, 10:24 AM
  #4  
Guthrie
Scooby Newbie
 
Guthrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think that the Forester will give the best handling out of the cars you have listed. It is the most car like. What Forester models are available in Turkey?

I had a current shape Forester in Australia with the 2.5l NA engine. It had reasonable performance (0-100km/h in 9.5 secs) and the handling was ok. If you want better on road handling, you need to upgrade at least the rear anti roll bar with a Sti one (or from an after market company like Whiteline).

Since i left Oz, the 2.5 litre turbo Forester was released. From what i read on the Australian MRT forums, the 2.5 litre turbo can be seriously quick with an exhaust and ecutek upgrade.
Old 28 October 2004, 10:25 AM
  #5  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

I would have gone for the RAV4 or the Forester from that lot. I would discount the Freelander on quality and reliability issues alone.

CR-V i drove the old shape and was completely underwhelmed with the handling. Not sure about the newer ones tho'
Old 28 October 2004, 10:31 AM
  #6  
drkuthan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
drkuthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Guthrie
I think that the Forester will give the best handling out of the cars you have listed. It is the most car like. What Forester models are available in Turkey?

I had a current shape Forester in Australia with the 2.5l NA engine. It had reasonable performance (0-100km/h in 9.5 secs) and the handling was ok. If you want better on road handling, you need to upgrade at least the rear anti roll bar with a Sti one (or from an after market company like Whiteline).

Since i left Oz, the 2.5 litre turbo Forester was released. From what i read on the Australian MRT forums, the 2.5 litre turbo can be seriously quick with an exhaust and ecutek upgrade.
2.0 xt version of the subaru forester (177 bhp 0-100km 8.0 secs) available in Turkey
Old 28 October 2004, 10:32 AM
  #7  
drkuthan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
drkuthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
I would have gone for the RAV4 or the Forester from that lot. I would discount the Freelander on quality and reliability issues alone.

CR-V i drove the old shape and was completely underwhelmed with the handling. Not sure about the newer ones tho'
If you had to chose between two ? Rav4 or forester ?

Trending Topics

Old 28 October 2004, 11:05 AM
  #8  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Then it becomes a trade-off, IMHO. Rav4 CAN look better (with right accessories, colour), Forester WILL go better (performance and handling).
Old 28 October 2004, 11:11 AM
  #9  
stevem2k
Scooby Regular
 
stevem2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Kingston ( Surrey, not Jamaica )
Posts: 4,670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Forester .

But I'm biased. Euro dealers are now getting the 2.5 XT , so you may want to check back with your dealer .....


Steve
Old 28 October 2004, 06:33 PM
  #10  
drkuthan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
drkuthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevem2k
Forester .

But I'm biased. Euro dealers are now getting the 2.5 XT , so you may want to check back with your dealer .....


Steve
I talked to the dealer and no they will not import 2.5 xt
Old 28 October 2004, 08:00 PM
  #11  
03-CTR
Scooby Regular
 
03-CTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bucks
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i'd wait for the crv with the i-ctdi engine as you'll then have one of the best soft roaders coupled to (arguably) the best diesel lump in production right now.
Old 28 October 2004, 08:24 PM
  #12  
TRF
Scooby Regular
 
TRF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My dad had the old shape CRV, and has just traided for the new one.. he says the new one is much better, but i havnt had a go yet. I did drive the older one and though it was ok, but nothing to write home about.
Old 29 October 2004, 09:40 AM
  #13  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RAV4 without a doubt. LWB or SWB.

2L SWB petrol is a fair bit quicker than you would imagine, and much cheaper to run than a turbo forrester. Handling is very good as well.

Look much better in black or silver than any forrester.

It will also be more reliable and be better value for money.

D
Old 30 October 2004, 12:34 PM
  #14  
drkuthan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
drkuthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am still waiting for the other drivers opinions and reviews...
Please help me to make a decision
Old 30 October 2004, 05:13 PM
  #15  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Would you buy a car without driving it?

Why not find a Rav4 and a Forester and make your own mind up?
Old 30 October 2004, 06:36 PM
  #16  
drkuthan
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
drkuthan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Would you buy a car without driving it?

Why not find a Rav4 and a Forester and make your own mind up?
Of course not. As you say taking a test drive will make things clear. Thanks




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:34 PM.