Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

v-tec's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 23 July 2003, 09:08 PM
  #1  
the chosen one
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
the chosen one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

which of the civics are v-tecs?

like lsi, esi, si, se, ls, es, which of these are actually v-tec powered?
Old 24 July 2003, 12:26 AM
  #2  
bear3784
Scooby Newbie
 
bear3784's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

missed out vti! vti DOHC VTEC, esi SOHC VTEC and thi lsi is a vtec but only for economy and not 4 power!
Old 24 July 2003, 01:22 AM
  #3  
kenny.c
Scooby Regular
 
kenny.c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

the lsi is just a 1.5cc non vtec, the vei is the economy vtec.
Old 24 July 2003, 09:47 AM
  #4  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Agreed

For the split tailgate 92 on (?) models the specs are as follows:-

Dx - 1.3L 16 valve single cam, non Vtec (70 bhp)
Lsi - 1.5L, 16 valve single cam non vtec (89bhp)
Vei - 1.5L 16 valve single cam Vtec - thats the economy tuned one
Esi - 1.6L, single cam vtec (123bhp)
Vti - 1.6L twin cam Vtec (158bhp)
CRX ESi - 1.6L, single cam vtec (123bhp)
CRX Vti - 1.6L twin cam Vtec (158bhp

Current generation details on honda website. Not sure about previous gen cars, but the Vti and Civic Jordan were as per VTI above.

HTH

D

[Edited by Diablo - 7/25/2003 8:09:05 AM]
Old 25 July 2003, 01:40 AM
  #5  
kenny.c
Scooby Regular
 
kenny.c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

also there was the swindon built civic's with the rover 200 5dr shell, the vti used the 1.8cc twin cam vtec with (167)bhp, i think came out on "N" reg still during the split tailgate(EG's) civics.

My friend recentley brought an R reg 1.8 vti(swindon version) although slightly torquier than the (b16a) 1.6 twin cam vtec before 5500krpm....i feel the 1.6 revs better and faster after 5500rpm .......still nice all the same..........although the cabin feels rover.
Old 25 July 2003, 04:27 AM
  #6  
Gary VR6
Scooby Regular
 
Gary VR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I'd agree with Kenny - the 1.8 twin cam vtec's are a little more torquey, but 1.6 twin cams rev much sweeter. I'm sure the 1.8s have crap gear ratios on purpose, too - neither as short or as close as other hondas, meaning that you can do nearly 70 in 2nd - no need at all.

1.6 twin cam (VTi) engines are great - mine had done 98,000 miles when I had it dyno'd - it gave 167bhp without any mods (158 is book figure, but losening with mileage helps).

Single cam 1.6 is OK - but the head gasket went on my ESi twice at only medium miles (60 & 80k). Nothing like as frantic as VTi either, but didn't feel at all slouchy after the 1.6 205 gti I'd had previously.
Old 25 July 2003, 08:08 AM
  #7  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Yup, the 3dr 1.6 Esi was a cracking little car for the money

Double wishbones all round.

Best warm hatch of its time IMO

D
Old 26 July 2003, 03:19 PM
  #8  
the chosen one
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
the chosen one's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

what would probably the best bet if you was gonna get any of the vtec powered cars? civic jordan or vti?
Old 26 July 2003, 07:13 PM
  #9  
Gary VR6
Scooby Regular
 
Gary VR6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The jordan civic was just a normal 1.6vti in a tarty outfit, so above comments re 1.6vti versus 1.8vti stand. 1.6 is a sportier drive, quicker and revvier than 1.8.

You'll pay over the odds for a jordan one, but then again it does look ace (except for the wheels which are pants).
Old 26 July 2003, 07:29 PM
  #10  
The Zohan
Scooby Regular
 
The Zohan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The 1.8VTI is not as 'revvy' but does have a fair bit of torque which he 1.6 does not have much of and the 1.8 has LSD so better at getting the power down.

I prefer the 1.8 having had both. easier to live with day to day

When i had the 1.6VTI i had it off the clock showing 8300rpm in 5th gear 'playing' with an Intergrale. i worked out the speed based on 18mph per 1000 rpm to 148MPH so not bad for a 1.6 4dr car in std trim, shocked the geezer in the intergrale as well

[Edited by Paul Habgood - 7/26/2003 7:34:34 PM]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
handsome rob
Other Marques
8
23 March 2010 08:20 PM



Quick Reply: v-tec's



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:06 AM.