VX220, hmmmmm
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not too slow these things Had the good forture of a wee play along some dualled road last night and the Vauxhall put in a good shift It had just started raining so I waited till he got up to 40mph before he (and subsequently I) nailed it. This was useful as it eliminated my advantage so we could compare the real world performance of both cars. From 40-80 it was pretty even-stevens but then the extra bhp made itself known and I passed. Nevertheless these things could potentially ease away from a standard scooby in certain speed ranges. Moreover, it seemed to keep up very slightly better than the MKII elise I played with a few months ago under similar circumstances.
All good fun and there is no real point to the post other than to outline the comparison - conslusion:
0-30 scooby is faster
30-80 about the same
80+ scooby is faster
Carrying 5 people in comfort, scooby is better
Should the VX driver drift on here: Thanks for the run mate and for conducting yourself safely
All good fun and there is no real point to the post other than to outline the comparison - conslusion:
0-30 scooby is faster
30-80 about the same
80+ scooby is faster
Carrying 5 people in comfort, scooby is better
Should the VX driver drift on here: Thanks for the run mate and for conducting yourself safely
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't think so, the turbo version has VX220 Turbo written on the back does it not. This didn't. Also, if it was the turbo I'd have been dust would I not? I didn't even know they were out yet actually!
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I take it this wasn't the turbo version as these things are quicker than most slightly modified scoobs
250 bhp and weight less than 1000kg, and 2WD!!!!
Trending Topics
#9
Horses for courses really.
The Turbo VX is a bit soft/lardy, the N/A VX is very similar to a std. Elise.
As far as driver enjoyment on twisty backroads in sunny weather, not much can beat an Elise/VX
The Turbo VX is a bit soft/lardy, the N/A VX is very similar to a std. Elise.
As far as driver enjoyment on twisty backroads in sunny weather, not much can beat an Elise/VX
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
0-62mph: 4.7 seconds....
Maximum speed: 151mph....
Economy: 43.6mpg extra urban, 33.3mpg combined
Maximum speed: 151mph....
Economy: 43.6mpg extra urban, 33.3mpg combined
#11
Having had an S2 for a month now, its all about the driver, on twisties espeacily if its wet, there is little to no difference in speed between a std VX and standard S2 IMHO, I prefer the S2, but really it is horses for courses. The VX220 I found a bit lardy, but good power, I really can't stand the look of the VX hence why I drive a 125BHP Elise and not a Turbo'd VX.
#13
Scooby Regular
LOT OF POWER + RWD + WET = FINDING OUT THE COLOUR OF FEAR!!!
I suppose you already found out......
What's with you lot?
Why a car has to be 4wd to be good?
I find most of the 4wd cars boring, the things just go wherever you want them to go. I can't see a challenge in that.
What's the point on having a car that cannot surprise you?
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
250 bhp and weight less than 1000kg, and 2WD
There has been talk of bringing out a 250bhp sprint version of the VXT, but I'm not aware that they've done so yet. One of the development engineers did comment that a reliable 310bhp is comfortable from that engine. That would give all bar the quickest scoobs a thrashing.
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I find most of the 4wd cars boring, the things just go wherever you want them to go. I can't see a challenge in that.
#18
Scooby Regular
I gave up my STi Type UK PPP a month ago, and bought a VX Turbo.
I was at Bedford today, using PalmerSports' cars, and (having driven my Imprezas there in the past) I was staggered at the sheer cornering and braking ability of the VXT.
All they do for track use is fit different brake pads, they are even on their standard Bridgestone RE040 road tyres, and the poor little things have stood up to being hammered to death six days a week for the last three months with no real problems
My second session was in the pouring rain, and as the instructors push you faster and faster I spun it about five times in one session looking for its limits (and finding them )
In the dry they will murder most Imprezas, and possibly in the wet on track too
Theere is no science to it, fire it flat out at every corner, stand on the brake pedal at way past the marker board, and turn in - at 930kg it will stand sudden direction changes - and having the engine over the back wheels you can get back on the gas at the apex. Despite the way Vauxhall got Lotus to set them up (safe understeer due to the bicycle wheels at the front) you can make it oversteer much of the time on track
I have no axe to grind on this, been there done that with the Impreza, but the VXT is 540kg lighter than the STi and it shows in its cornering agility.
As a road car it is seriously quick cross country. VXT performance in a straight line at 4.7 0-60 and 12.6 0-100 is virtually identical to the STi PPP.
Apart from the car mags all raving about the VXT, if you want to see how good it is go to the Lotus forums and see the sour grapes at the press comments that it is the Lotus that Lotus should have built for themselves, not for Vauxhall
A well loosened up NA VX is a very good car in its own right too, but the Turbo has the real grunt
PS - I made the right decision, I wouldn't now give up the VXT for the STi PPP
IMHO - the VX isn't for everyone
[Edited by Dave T-S - 6/6/2003 9:30:14 PM]
I was at Bedford today, using PalmerSports' cars, and (having driven my Imprezas there in the past) I was staggered at the sheer cornering and braking ability of the VXT.
All they do for track use is fit different brake pads, they are even on their standard Bridgestone RE040 road tyres, and the poor little things have stood up to being hammered to death six days a week for the last three months with no real problems
My second session was in the pouring rain, and as the instructors push you faster and faster I spun it about five times in one session looking for its limits (and finding them )
In the dry they will murder most Imprezas, and possibly in the wet on track too
Theere is no science to it, fire it flat out at every corner, stand on the brake pedal at way past the marker board, and turn in - at 930kg it will stand sudden direction changes - and having the engine over the back wheels you can get back on the gas at the apex. Despite the way Vauxhall got Lotus to set them up (safe understeer due to the bicycle wheels at the front) you can make it oversteer much of the time on track
I have no axe to grind on this, been there done that with the Impreza, but the VXT is 540kg lighter than the STi and it shows in its cornering agility.
As a road car it is seriously quick cross country. VXT performance in a straight line at 4.7 0-60 and 12.6 0-100 is virtually identical to the STi PPP.
Apart from the car mags all raving about the VXT, if you want to see how good it is go to the Lotus forums and see the sour grapes at the press comments that it is the Lotus that Lotus should have built for themselves, not for Vauxhall
A well loosened up NA VX is a very good car in its own right too, but the Turbo has the real grunt
PS - I made the right decision, I wouldn't now give up the VXT for the STi PPP
IMHO - the VX isn't for everyone
[Edited by Dave T-S - 6/6/2003 9:30:14 PM]
#19
Apart from the car mags all raving about the VXT, if you want to see how good it is go to the Lotus forums and see the sour grapes at the press comments that it is the Lotus that Lotus should have built for themselves, not for Vauxhall
As I found the VX lardy, I find the VXT even lardier and you only notice it in tight corners. The S2 weighs in 200 kilos lighter, which means less wear on the brakes, tyres, fuel consumption which is good for me. Lose some weight and it will be the even better.
Don't get me wrong it is a fantastic car, but the day I spend that sort of money on a car which IMHO is ugly, its time to hang up my driving shoes
#21
I am lucky to have both the VX and a WRX, they are both great cars and go about getting from A to B in different manners.
The trouble with the Scooby is it numbs out whats going on below compared to the VX where you can feel exactly whats going on, plus its more fun at lower speeds.
Plus with the temperature hitting late 20's out here in DE at the moment you know what car I am driving at the moment .
I have even been chugging down the autobahns at 4am this week after finishing nightshift and cant deny its great having the VX out here for the summer.
I am off to Issoire next weekend in the VX to meet up with the French scooby club for some weekend track fun.
Oh that reminds me I must get my summer tyres for the Scoob soon, got a nice little family trip planned to Italy next month, god its a hard life.
John.
The trouble with the Scooby is it numbs out whats going on below compared to the VX where you can feel exactly whats going on, plus its more fun at lower speeds.
Plus with the temperature hitting late 20's out here in DE at the moment you know what car I am driving at the moment .
I have even been chugging down the autobahns at 4am this week after finishing nightshift and cant deny its great having the VX out here for the summer.
I am off to Issoire next weekend in the VX to meet up with the French scooby club for some weekend track fun.
Oh that reminds me I must get my summer tyres for the Scoob soon, got a nice little family trip planned to Italy next month, god its a hard life.
John.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post