Civic Type R or keep my UK Impreza Turbo?
29 January 2003, 08:28 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I love my impreza but i've loved the CTR since it came out.
I love the traction I get but something keeps drawing me to a CTR.
The figures i've seen seem to suggest that the CTR is pretty much on par with my impreza (UK with ITG Filter, and soon a Scoobysport back box and centre section, so basically standard).
I'll probably get flamed for asking but which is the higher performer, the 1/4 mile teams people have been posting with those cars seem to be equal with the impreza!!!
Also a mate of mine has one and since i'm still wondering whether to get one or not we're gonna have a quick race from the lights soon, will I be embarrased, I hope not because it'll mean selling my Impreza.
decisions decisions, its a tough one, can anyone spread some light on the differences, I know its not 4wd and i'll sure miss that!
I love the traction I get but something keeps drawing me to a CTR.
The figures i've seen seem to suggest that the CTR is pretty much on par with my impreza (UK with ITG Filter, and soon a Scoobysport back box and centre section, so basically standard).
I'll probably get flamed for asking but which is the higher performer, the 1/4 mile teams people have been posting with those cars seem to be equal with the impreza!!!
Also a mate of mine has one and since i'm still wondering whether to get one or not we're gonna have a quick race from the lights soon, will I be embarrased, I hope not because it'll mean selling my Impreza.
decisions decisions, its a tough one, can anyone spread some light on the differences, I know its not 4wd and i'll sure miss that!
29 January 2003, 08:32 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
oh and i was reading reviews about handling and reading on the civic type r forums, everyone is saying that they handle well in the twisties, I thought thats what our cars did well?
Under what circumstances is the impreza quicker and vice versa
Under what circumstances is the impreza quicker and vice versa
29 January 2003, 08:47 PM
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Like any FWD car inherent problems with traction off the line and out of slow corners or damp/wet conditions. There wont be much in straight line and around the twisties it will come down to driver ability/stupidity.
It tends to rain a lot in the UK and the roads arent the best. On a damp/bumpy back road I know which car I would rather be in. For me the scoob would be safer and more predictable.
It tends to rain a lot in the UK and the roads arent the best. On a damp/bumpy back road I know which car I would rather be in. For me the scoob would be safer and more predictable.
29 January 2003, 10:34 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Norn Iron
Posts: 2,786
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A friend had one for about 4 months. The engine was replaced on about the 3rd month, after doing the big ends in. He hated the car, and got rid of it after that. It wasnt that quick either.
29 January 2003, 10:39 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another big factor if you don't permanently cane the ***** off the car - torque. Basically the honda engines have sod-all cos they get power by revving high and pushing the torque up the rev range. Not sure of Civic but the more powerful S2000 (about 235hp) has only 154lb-ft compared to over 200 for a standard UK turbo which is prolly being conservative. Plus the Impreza produces the torque lower down.
One of the reasons many people like the hondas cos you do have to thrash them to get the power, but if you don't then the scoob is much more flexible/torquey, especially a MY97> with the TD04 turbo.
One of the reasons many people like the hondas cos you do have to thrash them to get the power, but if you don't then the scoob is much more flexible/torquey, especially a MY97> with the TD04 turbo.
30 January 2003, 07:11 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
interesting reading, thanks guys.
Sounds to me like its prolly on par in a straight line and around bends, but in the wet and when you wanna drive carefully back from work after a long day that its just going to be annoyingly slow unless you concentrate on keeping the revs up, which means you'll be thrashing it every where you go.
Sounds to me like its prolly on par in a straight line and around bends, but in the wet and when you wanna drive carefully back from work after a long day that its just going to be annoyingly slow unless you concentrate on keeping the revs up, which means you'll be thrashing it every where you go.
Trending Topics
30 January 2003, 07:53 AM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Another big factor if you don't permanently cane the ***** off the car - torque. Basically the honda engines have sod-all cos they get power by revving high and pushing the torque up the rev range. Not sure of Civic but the more powerful S2000 (about 235hp) has only 154lb-ft compared to over 200 for a standard UK turbo which is prolly being conservative. Plus the Impreza produces the torque lower down.
One of the reasons many people like the hondas cos you do have to thrash them to get the power, but if you don't then the scoob is much more flexible/torquey, especially a MY97> with the TD04 turbo.
One of the reasons many people like the hondas cos you do have to thrash them to get the power, but if you don't then the scoob is much more flexible/torquey, especially a MY97> with the TD04 turbo.
If you think that the Civic has poor torque then you are automatically saying the same about almost every 2.0n/a car on sale today. The Civic has one of the best torque figures for its class, with 90% of it being available from 3000rpm onwards. Add in a redline of over 8000 and that's a pretty big window.
Sure the CTR doesn't have Scoob levels of torque - no non turbo car will - but it is better than most of the opposition.
30 January 2003, 08:46 AM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I saw one on track and my god did it corner well! 
I fancy one too, less desireable for vandals and a solid Honda lump, decent interior. Don't like the way it looks like a van though
MB
I fancy one too, less desireable for vandals and a solid Honda lump, decent interior. Don't like the way it looks like a van though
MB
30 January 2003, 09:18 AM
#10
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Not all those who wander are lost
Posts: 17,863
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seats manky ? WTF 
Have you ever sat/driven in one ? Doesn't sound like it. The seats are fantastic, miles more supportive than my old Impreza ones.
The CTR is a great car, love it to bits. I do miss the AWD especially in this weather. But it makes up for it in other areas.
Floor it and it really pulls, up to 6k and the iVTEC kicks in and it wails like a banshee. Scares the life out of the innocent public
Okay, so its not got a turbo, but thats not the be all. Its a great looking car, great handling, well (read - British) built car has the bomb proof iVTEC technology and a great close ratio 6-speed box.
Try it, you might just like it
Have you ever sat/driven in one ? Doesn't sound like it. The seats are fantastic, miles more supportive than my old Impreza ones.
The CTR is a great car, love it to bits. I do miss the AWD especially in this weather. But it makes up for it in other areas.
Floor it and it really pulls, up to 6k and the iVTEC kicks in and it wails like a banshee. Scares the life out of the innocent public
Okay, so its not got a turbo, but thats not the be all. Its a great looking car, great handling, well (read - British) built car has the bomb proof iVTEC technology and a great close ratio 6-speed box.
Try it, you might just like it
30 January 2003, 09:39 AM
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re the CTR seats - I loved them but only because they were similar to those in my old my00, which were a perfect fit! And the CTR gearshift is far better too, even if it does look odd.
30 January 2003, 10:22 AM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lack of torque. Oh dear, here we go (again).
No it doesn't have Scooby levels of torque, but the gearing multiplication factor negates much of a Scooby's advantage. Add the fact that it revs far higher as well and its not far behind.
After the 60-100 thread, I decided to try my incredibly scientific 60-100 in 4th, 5th and 6th test (one driver, one half full tank and one Pulsar watch- like I said, scientific)
Results:
4th: 8.8secs
5th: 12.5 secs
6th: 17 secs
Not exactly accurate I'll admit, but the 4th gear figure only uses VTEC after 80mph, and neither 5th or 6th are using VTEC at all. To put that in perspective, my 60-100 through 3rd and 4th was little quicker- 8.6secs on average. OK, that's using an inaccurate timing method and a speedo, but the comparison through the gears and purely in 4th are equally inaccurate (ie same method).
Point? It doesn't lack torque.
Just wish it was a new ITR, that Litchfield ad keeps flashing one up on the screen. I want one...
No it doesn't have Scooby levels of torque, but the gearing multiplication factor negates much of a Scooby's advantage. Add the fact that it revs far higher as well and its not far behind.
After the 60-100 thread, I decided to try my incredibly scientific 60-100 in 4th, 5th and 6th test (one driver, one half full tank and one Pulsar watch- like I said, scientific
)Results:
4th: 8.8secs
5th: 12.5 secs
6th: 17 secs
Not exactly accurate I'll admit, but the 4th gear figure only uses VTEC after 80mph, and neither 5th or 6th are using VTEC at all. To put that in perspective, my 60-100 through 3rd and 4th was little quicker- 8.6secs on average. OK, that's using an inaccurate timing method and a speedo, but the comparison through the gears and purely in 4th are equally inaccurate (ie same method).
Point? It doesn't lack torque.
Just wish it was a new ITR, that Litchfield ad keeps flashing one up on the screen. I want one...
30 January 2003, 01:19 PM
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sodding Chipbury
Posts: 2,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did someone mention Clio Cup - now there's a car with seriously crap torque.
Either that or the CTR aint to bad after all - seeing as they have almost exactly the same.
Either that or the CTR aint to bad after all - seeing as they have almost exactly the same.
30 January 2003, 01:26 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
was that clio cup thing a joke?
The car still has to have luxuries, if it doesnt have any then I may as well buy a gutted out kit car and stick a 2 litre turbo in that
The car still has to have luxuries, if it doesnt have any then I may as well buy a gutted out kit car and stick a 2 litre turbo in that
30 January 2003, 02:02 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The CTR isn't exactly fully loaded with toys. Standard = no stereo, aircon, clock, trip computer etc. etc. A basic Golf is more plush, if you're looking for toys you're in the wrong place. Didn't bother me, drove one then bought one
30 January 2003, 03:57 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
zax has obviously been looking at the imports, which don't get the alarm either.
Seats in the CTR weren't as good as the old recaros in my ITR, but by heck they blow the socks of the impreza (lets try and look sporty aka dodgy 50 quid halfords baseball cap boy racer seats!), handling is a good as it gets for a 2wd car, torque, yeah we haven't got a turbo... woo hoo!!!!, to me a turbo is lazy technology, I'll admit that nothing gives you a thump like a turbo, but it's so aggrecultural these days, I mean diesels have them !
Plus running costs, etc are a huge factor, I've got my fingers crossed that Honda Uk will import the new ITR, which has been rumoured for a while, and I guess the aggresive pricing of the CTR, can only mean the ITR would be sub £20K also.
Seats in the CTR weren't as good as the old recaros in my ITR, but by heck they blow the socks of the impreza (lets try and look sporty aka dodgy 50 quid halfords baseball cap boy racer seats!), handling is a good as it gets for a 2wd car, torque, yeah we haven't got a turbo... woo hoo!!!!, to me a turbo is lazy technology, I'll admit that nothing gives you a thump like a turbo, but it's so aggrecultural these days, I mean diesels have them !
Plus running costs, etc are a huge factor, I've got my fingers crossed that Honda Uk will import the new ITR, which has been rumoured for a while, and I guess the aggresive pricing of the CTR, can only mean the ITR would be sub £20K also.
30 January 2003, 07:14 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So it the crappy impreza or the CTR along with its
1. Massive amount of toys
2. Unbelievable amount of torque that defies the spec sheet and is only just short of the impreza due to its awesome gearbox ratio and engine
3. Best sounding engine ever built ever
4. Best interior ever built ever
5. Best handling 2WD car ever built ever
6. Infact its the best car ever ever ever LOL
Just drive them both on a wet afternoon and decide for yourself
Drive a classic STi and you realize 300bhp and 4WD can be fun to in the right hands.
[Edited by chrisp - 1/30/2003 7:15:42 PM]
1. Massive amount of toys
2. Unbelievable amount of torque that defies the spec sheet and is only just short of the impreza due to its awesome gearbox ratio and engine
3. Best sounding engine ever built ever
4. Best interior ever built ever
5. Best handling 2WD car ever built ever
6. Infact its the best car ever ever ever LOL
Just drive them both on a wet afternoon and decide for yourself
Drive a classic STi and you realize 300bhp and 4WD can be fun to in the right hands
.[Edited by chrisp - 1/30/2003 7:15:42 PM]
30 January 2003, 07:16 PM
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What do you guys think a Clio Cup is??
Stripped down to bare shell with 1 seat inside?
Clio Cups have
Electric Windows/mirrors
Full Trip Comp
Dual airbags
CD Player
Steering wheel remote
Fogs
Heated mirrors
Temp Guage
Have any of you ever seen a Clio Cup???
Scott
Stripped down to bare shell with 1 seat inside?
Clio Cups have
Electric Windows/mirrors
Full Trip Comp
Dual airbags
CD Player
Steering wheel remote
Fogs
Heated mirrors
Temp Guage
Have any of you ever seen a Clio Cup???
Scott
30 January 2003, 07:40 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: In wrxshire
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep I know but with a comment like that I couldnt resist the reply .
I think these cut down version are great pug did it with the rallyes and renault with the cup version. Gives you the choice for the budget minded.
.I think these cut down version are great pug did it with the rallyes and renault with the cup version. Gives you the choice for the budget minded.
30 January 2003, 08:19 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
<------- over here, they come as I described Didn't know UK models were that better equipped. Nice to know that I paid around 5 grand more than you guys for less gear! Never mention rip-off britain in my presence...
That said, I'm still a happy bunny
Didn't know UK models were that better equipped. Nice to know that I paid around 5 grand more than you guys for less gear! Never mention rip-off britain in my presence...That said, I'm still a happy bunny
