Rocks my world!
07 October 2002, 11:54 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 1999
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If they do Mark, I'll be the first in the queue.
Never mind the GT40. Why the bloody hell doesn't some manufacturer see the gaping niche in the market to produce a good looking coupe (how many new cars on the market can you claim to be good looking?) with RWD and around 180-190bhp/ton that you can actually DRIVE, instead of all these MPV sized so-called hot hatches with front wheel drive and girly traction control?
I'm off to polish my medallion.
[Edited by Olly - 7/10/2002 11:55:50 PM]
Never mind the GT40. Why the bloody hell doesn't some manufacturer see the gaping niche in the market to produce a good looking coupe (how many new cars on the market can you claim to be good looking?) with RWD and around 180-190bhp/ton that you can actually DRIVE, instead of all these MPV sized so-called hot hatches with front wheel drive and girly traction control?
I'm off to polish my medallion.
[Edited by Olly - 7/10/2002 11:55:50 PM]
07 November 2002, 10:06 AM
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1967 shelby gt 500 mustang shame it wasnt really that fast as they made out in gone in 60
well for a 7 litre 355bhp 420lbs/ft 4.8 to 60 and a very nice 16mpg with a weight of 3360lbs
But the rs 200 very very very nice car
[Edited by dogmaul - 7/11/2002 10:23:18 AM]
well for a 7 litre 355bhp 420lbs/ft 4.8 to 60 and a very nice 16mpg with a weight of 3360lbs But the rs 200 very very very nice car
[Edited by dogmaul - 7/11/2002 10:23:18 AM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM