Notices
Other Marques Non-Subaru Vehicles

st test drove the new RS3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13 June 2015, 11:44 AM
  #1  
stilover
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default st test drove the new RS3

As per title.

Damn it's fast! only had 56 miles on clock, but it is seriously quick. Obviously the DSG gearbox helps, but I really can't see many cars living with the RS3, especially given its got 5 seats and a boot.

The engine noise? To me sounds like a Lamborghini V10 when accelerating hard. Pops and bangs on the downshifts. You'd never tire of that noise.

Car was a £50k spec car, and had the wider front wheels. In as a demo, but sales women said she's got 2 people coming in today to maybe look to buy it. She's sold 3 herself already, and today is the official launch day.

Looks nice in the flesh, but maybe just a bit too plain Jane. The S3 saloon looks sportier.

Bad points? Yes one, the gearbox. Again, very fast in it's shifts, but all you do it steer and move your right foot. Didn't even think about using the flappy paddles, as I got bored with them when testing an S3.

Have told her to ring me as soon as she gets wind of Audi making an RS3 Saloon. I'll seriously consider one.

Pics to follow once I've downloaded them

Last edited by stilover; 13 June 2015 at 11:47 AM.
Old 13 June 2015, 11:48 AM
  #2  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fatter front tyres than rear.
Dodgy gearbox.
Zero adjustability - same old, same old.

But a nice interior and mentally fast so will sell.

http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/a...iew-2015-04-15

Zero interest.
Old 13 June 2015, 12:09 PM
  #3  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bigger front tyres?
What's the theory of that then?
Old 13 June 2015, 12:58 PM
  #4  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
Bigger front tyres?
What's the theory of that then?
To try and tame understeer I suspect.
Old 13 June 2015, 03:41 PM
  #5  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So a cheap 'solution' then.

Seems a bit of a cop out.
Old 13 June 2015, 03:47 PM
  #6  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

More or less.
Mounting the engine about a foot further back would help too.

Check your M3 out; the gap between the grille and engine is huge; Audi needs to do this too. Their engines are so far forward, they threaten to push the headlights out.
Old 13 June 2015, 03:58 PM
  #7  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The gap between the front of my Lotus and the engine is even bigger

Trending Topics

Old 13 June 2015, 04:06 PM
  #8  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by zip106
The gap between the front of my Lotus and the engine is even bigger
And the gap between the back too. Can't beat mid mounted; I'd get told off for buying one though.
Old 13 June 2015, 07:17 PM
  #9  
stilover
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Matteeboy
Fatter front tyres than rear.
Dodgy gearbox.
Zero adjustability - same old, same old.

But a nice interior and mentally fast so will sell.

http://www.topgear.com/uk/car-news/a...iew-2015-04-15

Zero interest.
To be fair, the only Audi with any dynamic edge to it is the R8.

But as an everyday proposition, with ownership appeal, residuals, build quality etc, the RS3 is a very convincing package. I'd certainly take an RS3 over the AMG45 anyday.

Saying that, I took my S3 on some back roads this afternoon, and the simple pleasure of using a manual gearbox, just shows how dull these Auto boxes are. Sadly, even if the do build an RS3 Saloon, they won't give it a manual gearbox
Old 13 June 2015, 10:52 PM
  #10  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Didn't it have enough torque to at least get the tail squirming a bit?
Old 14 June 2015, 10:50 AM
  #11  
stilover
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
Didn't it have enough torque to at least get the tail squirming a bit?

56 miles on the clock, and female sales woman next to me. It was basically a 10-15min blast out in it. Roads were also a bit damp. Scaring her wouldn't have been the sensible thing to do, given that she said that if it doesn't get sold, I can have it for half a day next time.
Old 14 June 2015, 11:00 AM
  #12  
stilover
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
stilover's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pics as promised. Don't think Black does it any favours, as it hides the more aggressive lines. From the side it does just look like a 2.0TDI S-Line with Rota alloys.







Old 14 June 2015, 11:44 AM
  #13  
BLU
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (27)
 
BLU's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Welsh Northland
Posts: 4,832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The styling does nothing for me...... maybe the saloon would be better.
Old 14 June 2015, 11:44 AM
  #14  
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
john banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: 32 cylinders and many cats
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Good point Rarely can a supervised test drive really tell you what it is really like.
Old 14 June 2015, 12:37 PM
  #15  
theboy
Scooby Regular
 
theboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Rugby League the greatest game in the world
Posts: 1,154
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had choice between the A45 & RS3, and for me it simply came down to looks. As the wife pointed out the Audi simply looks like a every day estate to the untrained eye.
Old 14 June 2015, 02:08 PM
  #16  
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
jameswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 6,535
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by john banks
Didn't it have enough torque to at least get the tail squirming a bit?
Drift-***** You got any updates to your sideways journey John? Thread on it maybe?

It does look pretty tame, I think the worst bit is it looks 4 years old. Certainly doesn't look like a new model.

I do like the idea of it though, 4wd, 5 doors, 5cyl turbo motor. Just think it looks a bit old, not necessarily bad looking just a bit dated? Don't think the wheel choice helps, nice enough but they hark back a few years.

Read the autocar (iirc) review and it wastes the A45 aparantly. Probably more in it with a remap no doubt.

What's the red car next to it? Bumper looks more sporty from what can be seen.

Last edited by jameswrx; 14 June 2015 at 02:10 PM.
Old 14 June 2015, 05:02 PM
  #17  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

362bhp and 2.5s quicker over the 1/4 than an A45 AMG Some journalists reporting 0-60 in the 3s bracket achievable.
Old 14 June 2015, 05:15 PM
  #18  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Bigarf bought one last year, ask him what he thinks of it after using it for some time?
Old 14 June 2015, 07:00 PM
  #19  
jameswrx
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
jameswrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 6,535
Received 40 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
Bigarf bought one last year, ask him what he thinks of it after using it for some time?
Would that not be the old model?
Old 14 June 2015, 07:06 PM
  #20  
DT-SPD
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
DT-SPD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rugby
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I love these, got a test drive in July and 99% sure I will be treating myself to one, can't wait.
Old 14 June 2015, 07:25 PM
  #21  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jameswrx
Would that not be the old model?
Yes.
Old 14 June 2015, 07:30 PM
  #22  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Looks like yet another European jelly mould.
Old 14 June 2015, 07:35 PM
  #23  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Yet they've somehow managed to make that line 8"below the window running length of car appear not actually straight .....
Old 15 June 2015, 07:20 PM
  #24  
LSherratt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
LSherratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: On a farm
Posts: 3,379
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Yet they've somehow managed to make that line 8"below the window running length of car appear not actually straight .....
It's not is it if you look really closely .
Old 15 June 2015, 07:23 PM
  #25  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

at 50k its alot money though
Old 15 June 2015, 07:32 PM
  #26  
Matteeboy
Scooby Regular
 
Matteeboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Mars
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Spend it a faster car that has proper AWD and doesn't need fatter front tyres - An Evo FQ440/400/360.

Early tests don't look too promising except for the numbers coming out.
Old 15 June 2015, 07:36 PM
  #27  
P1Fanatic
Scooby Regular
 
P1Fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hats off sticking with a 5 pot. Certainly sounds the part compared to the competition.
Old 15 June 2015, 07:38 PM
  #28  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

at 15k away from a rs4, too close to that for me
Old 15 June 2015, 08:40 PM
  #29  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

I think I'm going to take one for a test drive. I quite like the look of them.

Originally Posted by bioforger
362bhp and 2.5s quicker over the 1/4 than an A45 AMG Some journalists reporting 0-60 in the 3s bracket achievable.
2.5s quicker!!?? Who's printed that crap?

A bog standard A45 does the quarter in the 12's.
Old 15 June 2015, 09:24 PM
  #30  
bioforger
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
bioforger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pig Hill, Wiltsh1te
Posts: 16,995
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
I think I'm going to take one for a test drive. I quite like the look of them.

2.5s quicker!!?? Who's printed that crap?

A bog standard A45 does the quarter in the 12's.
Ok over zealous journalists, i read it somewhere else, its 0.9sec faster, yours is a 13s car. Well according to this in autocar anyway. IRL not much in it.



Quick Reply: st test drove the new RS3



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:19 AM.