Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Am I being thick or something ( flood prevention).

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 February 2014, 07:15 PM
  #1  
paulr
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Am I being thick or something ( flood prevention).

Do sandbags really stop water coming through, can't it get between the gaps?

Isn't it better to

A, put silicone sealer around the door
B, have some sort of detachable water barrier around the bottom of the door.

Can water enter the house any other way apart from the door?

Like I say, I might be missing something obvious.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:22 PM
  #2  
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
stevebt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Received 33 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Water will enter a house thru the brickwork and I don.t think silicone sealer will help Sand bags placed a good distance from the property will protect it.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:22 PM
  #3  
LSherratt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
LSherratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: On a farm
Posts: 3,379
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Pretty sure that sandbags can only do so much, but once the water reaches a certain level or hangs around the bags for so long, it'll eventually work it's way through the tiny gaps around the bags (that's my guess anyway).

Sealant would probably better but surely you'd have to apply that when it's all dry and before the floods actually hit? Plus I bet the water would work its way through anyway looking at the devastation that's been caused recently!

The best thing to do would be to clear all the silt from the rivers and for people to stop throwing so much sh1te into our waters!

Last edited by LSherratt; 16 February 2014 at 07:23 PM.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:25 PM
  #4  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

sandbags are just a measure to help if the water isnt to high, they do work.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:26 PM
  #5  
paulr
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sealing the door is probably not a good idea.

However, google shows you can get flood boards that seal the bottom of the door.
Does water seep through bricks.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:28 PM
  #6  
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
tubbytommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: crawley :)
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
Sealing the door is probably not a good idea.

However, google shows you can get flood boards that seal the bottom of the door.
Does water seep through bricks.
bricks are porous so eventually yes, but short term no
Old 16 February 2014, 07:29 PM
  #7  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
Old 16 February 2014, 07:30 PM
  #8  
Cpt Jack Sparrow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Cpt Jack Sparrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Although they stop an amount of water they can't prevent flooding.

What they do do however is filter water and reduce the mud and soil damage
Old 16 February 2014, 07:46 PM
  #9  
Aaron1978
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Aaron1978's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Moved to the Darkside
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
Ditches and dykes are generally owned by the landowner.

The IDB and the EA are who should be getting the grief, as they are the ones who are normally supposed to make whoever owns the dyke/ditch/rivers maintain them.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:50 PM
  #10  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
However, google shows you can get flood boards that seal the bottom of the door.
Now why more people in flood prone areas don't have these I don't know. It's not like there new technology.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:50 PM
  #11  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In the village where I live it regularly floods on the main road due to all the drainage culverts being blocked as the decison to stop clearing them was taken a decade or so ago.

All the shops have permanent flood board installations that they can deploy as soon as the levels start rising and they do work. The ones that don't have this have sandbags instead..... and wet shops when it floods.... I think that answers your question.
Old 16 February 2014, 07:59 PM
  #12  
SiPie
Scooby Regular
 
SiPie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Scotland
Posts: 7,249
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-26187262
Old 16 February 2014, 08:14 PM
  #13  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
Obviously nothing, as for the 20 or 30 years before privatisation there was no dredging or ditch and dyke maintenance then either.

£85 billion has been invested in water infrastructure since privatisation except in Scotland where the industry is still in the public domain. Water rates there are the same as other water utilities but there has been less investment and a it has lot more debt. In fact Scottish water still has to be subsidised by the taxpayer to survive.

Buy hey, lets not let a few facts get in the way of a good moan eh.
Old 16 February 2014, 08:16 PM
  #14  
CharlySkunkWeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
CharlySkunkWeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Bangor-Northern Ireland
Posts: 3,499
Received 70 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Aren't sandbags just to divert the water away from the property ?
Old 16 February 2014, 08:38 PM
  #15  
Ayde
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Ayde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: North West
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Aaron1978
Ditches and dykes are generally owned by the landowner.

The IDB and the EA are who should be getting the grief, as they are the ones who are normally supposed to make whoever owns the dyke/ditch/rivers maintain them.
This along with the local councils being responsible for gulley sucking out the street drains etc...

The water companies would be penalised heavily by the EA and OFWAT if it was their responsibility and it hadn't been carried out.
Old 16 February 2014, 08:43 PM
  #16  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Obviously nothing, as for the 20 or 30 years before privatisation there was no dredging or ditch and dyke maintenance then either.
Water companies were privatised in 1989, regular dredging of rivers surrounding the Somerset levels ceased in 1991! What was that you were saying about facts getting in the way of a good moan?!
Old 16 February 2014, 08:49 PM
  #17  
Steve's Sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Steve's Sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Fraserburgh
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Buy some inflatable paddling pools as nothin will stop the water
Old 16 February 2014, 11:03 PM
  #18  
riiidaa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
riiidaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Near Croydon
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
Do sandbags really stop water coming through, can't it get between the gaps?

Isn't it better to

A, put silicone sealer around the door
B, have some sort of detachable water barrier around the bottom of the door.

Can water enter the house any other way apart from the door?

Like I say, I might be missing something obvious.
Originally Posted by neil-h
Now why more people in flood prone areas don't have these I don't know. It's not like there new technology.
news report i watched showed them to be useless, and they were fitted by council

they do bugger all if the water comes up through the ground and then flooring anyway

Last edited by riiidaa; 16 February 2014 at 11:05 PM.
Old 16 February 2014, 11:05 PM
  #19  
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: To the valley men!
Posts: 19,156
Received 14 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Water will come back up the ****ter, through vent bricks and the more paved areas you have the less soakaways for water.
Old 17 February 2014, 08:30 AM
  #20  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by riiidaa
news report i watched showed them to be useless, and they were fitted by council

they do bugger all if the water comes up through the ground and then flooring anyway
Horses for courses. Yes for ground water flooding then there no help but for surface water/run off then they will make a difference.
Old 17 February 2014, 09:17 AM
  #21  
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Brun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Harrogate
Posts: 14,229
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Another random question - too much water on Earth. Can we no build a huge pump/pipe and pump a load into space?
Old 17 February 2014, 09:21 AM
  #22  
JackClark
Scooby Senior
 
JackClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Overdosed on LCD
Posts: 20,852
Received 51 Likes on 34 Posts
Default

Pretty sure I heard that dredging wouldn't help anyway as the weirs hold the water back.
Old 17 February 2014, 09:27 AM
  #23  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
Pretty sure I heard that dredging wouldn't help anyway as the weirs hold the water back.
Depends on the gate configuration and if they are/aren't controllable. For instance a lot of the weirs on the Thames are controllable, so to a certain extent the height of the Thames can be set at various point by opening/closing weirs as required.
Old 17 February 2014, 03:42 PM
  #24  
specialx
Former Sponsor
 
specialx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: WWW.SCOOBYCLINIC.COM
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
Another random question - too much water on Earth. Can we no build a huge pump/pipe and pump a load into space?

This I would pay to see well I'd probably be paying for it anyway!
Old 17 February 2014, 03:56 PM
  #25  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
Another random question - too much water on Earth. Can we no build a huge pump/pipe and pump a load into space?


Transport a load of it to Africa and Ethiopia etvc - they're always complaining about no water.
Old 17 February 2014, 05:52 PM
  #26  
Richy P1984
Scooby Regular
 
Richy P1984's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: West London
Posts: 589
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Sand bags are best used with an impermeable membrane (plastic sheeting of some description). They are good for the short term, but after a while the water will find its way in.

Problem with sandbags is once the event is over, they can often become home to bacteria, and then have to be disposed off as hazardous waste - not cheap.

People keep going on about dredging - its not the be all and end all of flood prevention, its one of a few exercises that can be carried out to help prevent minor events - but with the current conditions, it wouldn't have made much difference.

If you don't want flooding, leave the floodplains alone, and don't live within silly distances of the sea.
Old 17 February 2014, 06:38 PM
  #27  
riiidaa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
riiidaa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Near Croydon
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

those silly sods that spent Valentines at a beach front restaurant got lucky imo, what the hell were they thinking
Old 17 February 2014, 06:56 PM
  #28  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
River management is apparently quite a complex and counter-intuitive science. For example 'improving' a river can actually make flooding worse or shift it to somewhere else up or down stream.

From what I can tell - as a laymen who has read a few articles - our major problem is not having enough trees and vegetation in catchment areas. Instead our farmers keep grassland as they get subsidies for it. Having trees radically improves the soils ability to soak up the rain and stop it running straight off.
Old 17 February 2014, 09:32 PM
  #29  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Yes you can see "dredging" as the new simple solution to the countries problems especially for the green welly brigade

Any back to the original question

Line the rivers with immigrants head to toe - wearing waterproof clothing, and smeared in used engine oil, should do the job
Old 19 February 2014, 08:41 AM
  #30  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
£85 billion has been invested in water infrastructure since privatisation
How much has been sucked out in 'profit'?


Quick Reply: Am I being thick or something ( flood prevention).



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:53 AM.