Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Am I being thick or something ( flood prevention).

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:15 PM
  #1  
paulr's Avatar
paulr
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
Default Am I being thick or something ( flood prevention).

Do sandbags really stop water coming through, can't it get between the gaps?

Isn't it better to

A, put silicone sealer around the door
B, have some sort of detachable water barrier around the bottom of the door.

Can water enter the house any other way apart from the door?

Like I say, I might be missing something obvious.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:22 PM
  #2  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

Water will enter a house thru the brickwork and I don.t think silicone sealer will help Sand bags placed a good distance from the property will protect it.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:22 PM
  #3  
LSherratt's Avatar
LSherratt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,380
Likes: 2
From: On a farm
Default

Pretty sure that sandbags can only do so much, but once the water reaches a certain level or hangs around the bags for so long, it'll eventually work it's way through the tiny gaps around the bags (that's my guess anyway).

Sealant would probably better but surely you'd have to apply that when it's all dry and before the floods actually hit? Plus I bet the water would work its way through anyway looking at the devastation that's been caused recently!

The best thing to do would be to clear all the silt from the rivers and for people to stop throwing so much sh1te into our waters!

Last edited by LSherratt; Feb 16, 2014 at 07:23 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:25 PM
  #4  
tubbytommy's Avatar
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 1
From: crawley :)
Default

sandbags are just a measure to help if the water isnt to high, they do work.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:26 PM
  #5  
paulr's Avatar
paulr
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
From: Lincolnshire
Default

Sealing the door is probably not a good idea.

However, google shows you can get flood boards that seal the bottom of the door.
Does water seep through bricks.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:28 PM
  #6  
tubbytommy's Avatar
tubbytommy
BANNED
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 16,950
Likes: 1
From: crawley :)
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
Sealing the door is probably not a good idea.

However, google shows you can get flood boards that seal the bottom of the door.
Does water seep through bricks.
bricks are porous so eventually yes, but short term no
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:29 PM
  #7  
alcazar's Avatar
alcazar
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 40,788
Likes: 30
From: Rl'yeh
Default

Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:30 PM
  #8  
Cpt Jack Sparrow's Avatar
Cpt Jack Sparrow
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 2,417
Likes: 0
From: Bedfordshire
Default

Although they stop an amount of water they can't prevent flooding.

What they do do however is filter water and reduce the mud and soil damage
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:46 PM
  #9  
Aaron1978's Avatar
Aaron1978
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
From: Moved to the Darkside
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
Ditches and dykes are generally owned by the landowner.

The IDB and the EA are who should be getting the grief, as they are the ones who are normally supposed to make whoever owns the dyke/ditch/rivers maintain them.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:50 PM
  #10  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
However, google shows you can get flood boards that seal the bottom of the door.
Now why more people in flood prone areas don't have these I don't know. It's not like there new technology.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:50 PM
  #11  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

In the village where I live it regularly floods on the main road due to all the drainage culverts being blocked as the decison to stop clearing them was taken a decade or so ago.

All the shops have permanent flood board installations that they can deploy as soon as the levels start rising and they do work. The ones that don't have this have sandbags instead..... and wet shops when it floods.... I think that answers your question.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 07:59 PM
  #12  
SiPie's Avatar
SiPie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,249
Likes: 0
From: Scotland
Default

http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-magazine-monitor-26187262
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 08:14 PM
  #13  
Chip's Avatar
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
From: Cardiff. Wales
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
Obviously nothing, as for the 20 or 30 years before privatisation there was no dredging or ditch and dyke maintenance then either.

£85 billion has been invested in water infrastructure since privatisation except in Scotland where the industry is still in the public domain. Water rates there are the same as other water utilities but there has been less investment and a it has lot more debt. In fact Scottish water still has to be subsidised by the taxpayer to survive.

Buy hey, lets not let a few facts get in the way of a good moan eh.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 08:16 PM
  #14  
CharlySkunkWeed's Avatar
CharlySkunkWeed
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 70
From: Bangor-Northern Ireland
Default

Aren't sandbags just to divert the water away from the property ?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 08:38 PM
  #15  
Ayde's Avatar
Ayde
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
From: North West
Default

Originally Posted by Aaron1978
Ditches and dykes are generally owned by the landowner.

The IDB and the EA are who should be getting the grief, as they are the ones who are normally supposed to make whoever owns the dyke/ditch/rivers maintain them.
This along with the local councils being responsible for gulley sucking out the street drains etc...

The water companies would be penalised heavily by the EA and OFWAT if it was their responsibility and it hadn't been carried out.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 08:43 PM
  #16  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Obviously nothing, as for the 20 or 30 years before privatisation there was no dredging or ditch and dyke maintenance then either.
Water companies were privatised in 1989, regular dredging of rivers surrounding the Somerset levels ceased in 1991! What was that you were saying about facts getting in the way of a good moan?!
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 08:49 PM
  #17  
Steve's Sti's Avatar
Steve's Sti
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
From: Fraserburgh
Default

Buy some inflatable paddling pools as nothin will stop the water
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 11:03 PM
  #18  
riiidaa's Avatar
riiidaa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
From: Near Croydon
Default

Originally Posted by paulr
Do sandbags really stop water coming through, can't it get between the gaps?

Isn't it better to

A, put silicone sealer around the door
B, have some sort of detachable water barrier around the bottom of the door.

Can water enter the house any other way apart from the door?

Like I say, I might be missing something obvious.
Originally Posted by neil-h
Now why more people in flood prone areas don't have these I don't know. It's not like there new technology.
news report i watched showed them to be useless, and they were fitted by council

they do bugger all if the water comes up through the ground and then flooring anyway

Last edited by riiidaa; Feb 16, 2014 at 11:05 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2014 | 11:05 PM
  #19  
The Trooper 1815's Avatar
The Trooper 1815
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 15
From: To the valley men!
Default

Water will come back up the ****ter, through vent bricks and the more paved areas you have the less soakaways for water.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 08:30 AM
  #20  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by riiidaa
news report i watched showed them to be useless, and they were fitted by council

they do bugger all if the water comes up through the ground and then flooring anyway
Horses for courses. Yes for ground water flooding then there no help but for surface water/run off then they will make a difference.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 09:17 AM
  #21  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,231
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

Another random question - too much water on Earth. Can we no build a huge pump/pipe and pump a load into space?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 09:21 AM
  #22  
JackClark's Avatar
JackClark
Scooby Senior
25 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 20,896
Likes: 53
From: Overdosed on LCD
Default

Pretty sure I heard that dredging wouldn't help anyway as the weirs hold the water back.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 09:27 AM
  #23  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by JackClark
Pretty sure I heard that dredging wouldn't help anyway as the weirs hold the water back.
Depends on the gate configuration and if they are/aren't controllable. For instance a lot of the weirs on the Thames are controllable, so to a certain extent the height of the Thames can be set at various point by opening/closing weirs as required.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 03:42 PM
  #24  
specialx's Avatar
specialx
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 4,313
Likes: 0
From: WWW.SCOOBYCLINIC.COM
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
Another random question - too much water on Earth. Can we no build a huge pump/pipe and pump a load into space?

This I would pay to see well I'd probably be paying for it anyway!
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 03:56 PM
  #25  
urban's Avatar
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 1
From: Never you mind
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
Another random question - too much water on Earth. Can we no build a huge pump/pipe and pump a load into space?


Transport a load of it to Africa and Ethiopia etvc - they're always complaining about no water.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 05:52 PM
  #26  
Richy P1984's Avatar
Richy P1984
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 589
Likes: 7
From: West London
Default

Sand bags are best used with an impermeable membrane (plastic sheeting of some description). They are good for the short term, but after a while the water will find its way in.

Problem with sandbags is once the event is over, they can often become home to bacteria, and then have to be disposed off as hazardous waste - not cheap.

People keep going on about dredging - its not the be all and end all of flood prevention, its one of a few exercises that can be carried out to help prevent minor events - but with the current conditions, it wouldn't have made much difference.

If you don't want flooding, leave the floodplains alone, and don't live within silly distances of the sea.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 06:38 PM
  #27  
riiidaa's Avatar
riiidaa
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 3,349
Likes: 0
From: Near Croydon
Default

those silly sods that spent Valentines at a beach front restaurant got lucky imo, what the hell were they thinking
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 06:56 PM
  #28  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Of course, if the water companies weren't both trousering and paying their profits to shareholders, there MIGHT actually be some left for dredging, ditch and dyke maintenance pump maintenance, bank maintenance, weed-clearance etc etc.

But hey, what do I know?
River management is apparently quite a complex and counter-intuitive science. For example 'improving' a river can actually make flooding worse or shift it to somewhere else up or down stream.

From what I can tell - as a laymen who has read a few articles - our major problem is not having enough trees and vegetation in catchment areas. Instead our farmers keep grassland as they get subsidies for it. Having trees radically improves the soils ability to soak up the rain and stop it running straight off.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2014 | 09:32 PM
  #29  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 22
From: K
Default

Yes you can see "dredging" as the new simple solution to the countries problems especially for the green welly brigade

Any back to the original question

Line the rivers with immigrants head to toe - wearing waterproof clothing, and smeared in used engine oil, should do the job
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2014 | 08:41 AM
  #30  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
£85 billion has been invested in water infrastructure since privatisation
How much has been sucked out in 'profit'?
Reply



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 PM.