warrenm2

The head of HR for the BBC claimed she did not know of an email about huge payoffs, now admits she did. Not really the model for someone at the top of their profession. Is it credible that she didn't understand the question or is it simply another attempt by some slimy public servant to weedle out of awkward questions?

She should go immediately at best (with NO payout) or even better be charged with perjury (although it probably doesn't apply to PAC evidence unfortunately)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-23985032

cster

If she went, she'd probably just walk into a similar position in another QANGO.
To paraphrase TdeW, QANGOs are the social welfare system for the plutocracy.

hodgy0_2

lying -- these people (not just in the public sector) should have all their pension entitlement wiped out for this sort of stuff

that would really focus the mind

David Lock

I heard on the beeb that she had written part of the document. Odd that she couldn't remember it

dl

47 NAT

Typical HR.
Admit nothing, deny everything, then come out of it been patted on the back for a superb job.