Nerve agents
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes
on
12 Posts
Nerve agents
I'm confused, I swear I heard the President state chemical weapons hadn't been used for a hundred years.
And yet the US used naplam all through Vietnam
And yet the US used naplam all through Vietnam
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: 535D M-Sport Touring
Posts: 3,190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As stated Napalm is definitely not a "chemical weapon" (though you could argue it is made from chemicals).
It's a mixture of petrol with a gelling agent and is used in incendiary devices. Not nice when used against human targets as the burning fuel sticks to you skin and is hard to extinguish hence the victims tend to die in agony of horrific burns.
It's a mixture of petrol with a gelling agent and is used in incendiary devices. Not nice when used against human targets as the burning fuel sticks to you skin and is hard to extinguish hence the victims tend to die in agony of horrific burns.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Napalm is not technically classed as a chemical weapon and for some reason the fixation over the whole Syria thing is on the method of death/chemical weapons.
Cameron and Obama's desire to intervene is because 1400 people were killed by sarin gas in Syria by Assad's regime (or so we are told) and this has outraged many including a good number on here.
Meanwhile the 100,000 people that have already died in Syria in the last 3 years seems not cause anywhere near the furore ... so presumably it's OK as long as they are not being killed by chemical weapons
Cameron and Obama's desire to intervene is because 1400 people were killed by sarin gas in Syria by Assad's regime (or so we are told) and this has outraged many including a good number on here.
Meanwhile the 100,000 people that have already died in Syria in the last 3 years seems not cause anywhere near the furore ... so presumably it's OK as long as they are not being killed by chemical weapons
Trending Topics
#10
#12
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#13
Scooby Regular
Yep, I'm sure the Palestinians killed by white phosphorus would have died happy in knowledge that no chemical weapons had been used in their death
#14
I didn't make the rules or norms of war. Things like expanding rounds are banned in The Hague convention, some stuff is just against he rules.
#16
Scooby Regular
Agent Orange was used by the US as a defoliant, but it had some very nasty side effects that are still a major health/environmental issue for the Vietnamese today
But, as it allegedly wasn't intentionally used as an offensive weapon, it doesn't count as a chemical weapon
That's obviously only according to the country that used it
But, as it allegedly wasn't intentionally used as an offensive weapon, it doesn't count as a chemical weapon
That's obviously only according to the country that used it
#17
Napalm is a chemical substance just as explosives are and so are human beings for that matter.
Napalm is use to start nasty fires not to kill people in the same way as a nerve agent.
Les
Napalm is use to start nasty fires not to kill people in the same way as a nerve agent.
Les
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last edited by JTaylor; 08 September 2013 at 10:20 AM.
#21
#22
The whole country was issued with gas masks during WW2, even special size ones for children. They certainly thought there was a possibility of a gas attack on this country.
Stocks of nerve gases will be maintained by all governments just in case the other side has it and is prepared to use it.
Les
#24
Agent Orange was used by the US as a defoliant, but it had some very nasty side effects that are still a major health/environmental issue for the Vietnamese today
But, as it allegedly wasn't intentionally used as an offensive weapon, it doesn't count as a chemical weapon
That's obviously only according to the country that used it
But, as it allegedly wasn't intentionally used as an offensive weapon, it doesn't count as a chemical weapon
That's obviously only according to the country that used it
You want to include this in a list of chemical weapons in a thread about nerve agents.
Why don't you cut the crap and just say you don't like Americans?
#25
#26
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Funny (NOT) that Merka want to extent the deadline to 2023 (despite the fact that most chemical weapons have a "shelf life" of weeks, never minds years!!).
mb
Last edited by boomer; 09 September 2013 at 09:53 PM. Reason: Link text duplicated (and unable to change it)
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
They used chlorine gas in WW1 in the trenches. It is a heavy gas and forms hydrochloric acid in the lungs. Not a nerve gas of course but pretty nasty effects from it. I knew an elderly man who was gassed in WW1 and he was in a pretty bad state even many years afterwards.
The whole country was issued with gas masks during WW2, even special size ones for children. They certainly thought there was a possibility of a gas attack on this country.
Stocks of nerve gases will be maintained by all governments just in case the other side has it and is prepared to use it.
Les
The whole country was issued with gas masks during WW2, even special size ones for children. They certainly thought there was a possibility of a gas attack on this country.
Stocks of nerve gases will be maintained by all governments just in case the other side has it and is prepared to use it.
Les
They not used only Chlorine,but they used too Sulfur mustard(many people rather this know as Yperite) and many other
As per Syria there has been used cocktail of more than one gas I would say
Jura
#28
Scooby Regular
Well a weapon that is a defoliant and is not feared by the enemy because they are unaware that it may have some effect on them in the future.
You want to include this in a list of chemical weapons in a thread about nerve agents.
Why don't you cut the crap and just say you don't like Americans?
You want to include this in a list of chemical weapons in a thread about nerve agents.
Why don't you cut the crap and just say you don't like Americans?
Those side effects were known at the time, yet it was used anyway. This to my mind makes it an offensive weapon
Why do you say that I don't like Americans
There are things about America that I do not like, but overall I would say they are no worse, or better, than any other nation.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: High Wycombe
Posts: 3,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you have the pleasure of visiting Vietnam (which I recommend). You mist visit the War museum - it certainly puts a different slant on things.
The contamination of AO are still being felt today. Large areas of land are unusable. Even the once clean neighbouring areas are now contaminated.
The Half-Life of this stuff is 8 x longer than nuclear weapons - so it's not going away any time soon.
The horrible side affects are also prevalent - mainly exhibited with gruesome birth defects & cancers.
The contamination of AO are still being felt today. Large areas of land are unusable. Even the once clean neighbouring areas are now contaminated.
The Half-Life of this stuff is 8 x longer than nuclear weapons - so it's not going away any time soon.
The horrible side affects are also prevalent - mainly exhibited with gruesome birth defects & cancers.
Last edited by BlkKnight; 10 September 2013 at 12:11 PM.
#30
Les