Illegal websites
#1
Illegal websites
After the conviction of that sick retard that killed that little girl in Wales the children's charity's are asking for a crack down on child **** sites.
Am I missing something? I thought child **** was illegal in this country and without googling I would have thought typing child **** referring words would bring up an official government warning.
No?
Am I missing something? I thought child **** was illegal in this country and without googling I would have thought typing child **** referring words would bring up an official government warning.
No?
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys never heard of 'Tor' '.onion' or 'the Deep Web'? That's how easy it is to access this and other material should you so wish.
Handy if you want a hired assassin too, apparently.
Handy if you want a hired assassin too, apparently.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 568
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As said before I had assumed (falsly is seems) that everything possible was already being done to stop these site and catch their users.
#6
I haven't seen that kind of **** in a long, long time. It used to be rife. If you were into doing illegal things (i.e. cracking programs etc..), using certain types of program to download software or (in the bygone days of IRC) using some chat programs I would see those kind of images all the time. Obviously not solicited by me, but the adverts seemed to assume "looking for dodgy software serials = want to look at young teenage girls".
So to a certain extent I would say that things have been cleaned up and even hosting countries like Russia seem to have cracked down.
But, as always, technology moves on. And if you ARE looking for that kind of stuff there is Tor and Onion as mentioned above and they are really hard to stop. They truly hide both your and the servers identity. You may have heard in the news about the LulzSec group and they were only caught because one of them forgot to use TOR to connect to a chatroom, other than that not a hope of tracing them.
So to a certain extent I would say that things have been cleaned up and even hosting countries like Russia seem to have cracked down.
But, as always, technology moves on. And if you ARE looking for that kind of stuff there is Tor and Onion as mentioned above and they are really hard to stop. They truly hide both your and the servers identity. You may have heard in the news about the LulzSec group and they were only caught because one of them forgot to use TOR to connect to a chatroom, other than that not a hope of tracing them.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While this discussion is all very well do we actually believe that viewng these sort of images turns someone into a murdering paedophile as that is the implcation by these charities.
They seem to be implying that if he hadn't had those images he wouldn't have done it..... which is of course unproven and likely to be nonsense!
They seem to be implying that if he hadn't had those images he wouldn't have done it..... which is of course unproven and likely to be nonsense!
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Typical of the media whipping up hysteria while not understanding how the Deep Web works.
#9
I too am dubious about the link of looking at such pictures turning someone into a killer paedophile. I think it's a symptom rather than the cause. The same crap is spouted by people who link murders to violent videogames.
Last edited by ReallyReallyGoodMeat; 31 May 2013 at 01:41 PM.
#10
The suggestion that Google should police their results and remove anything illegal just shows an ignorance of technology and the practices of those involved in illegal activities.
Proactively removing content would need human intervention as I very much doubt sites carrying such content have 'CHILD ****' splashed all over them in such a way that an algorithm could detect. Google has millions, if not billions and trillions of indexed pages... the cost implications are just unfeasible, no matter how abhorrent the content might be. Besides, I'd put money on the fact that the sickos that DO want to find this stuff don't Google for it - as has been said already there are lots of sub-networks around which allow more anonymous browsing and data transfer.
Rather than making the content harder to find, they should be focusing on tracking down the people making it and stopping it ever existing in the first place.
Proactively removing content would need human intervention as I very much doubt sites carrying such content have 'CHILD ****' splashed all over them in such a way that an algorithm could detect. Google has millions, if not billions and trillions of indexed pages... the cost implications are just unfeasible, no matter how abhorrent the content might be. Besides, I'd put money on the fact that the sickos that DO want to find this stuff don't Google for it - as has been said already there are lots of sub-networks around which allow more anonymous browsing and data transfer.
Rather than making the content harder to find, they should be focusing on tracking down the people making it and stopping it ever existing in the first place.
#11
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chap on radio was saying that people go to legal **** sites but these are loaded with ads for other illegal sites. Often with coded names that are understood by the paedophile s,hitheads.
I came across one years ago when I was doing some research into safety of kids wearing seat belts on school buses; I suppose the word "children" was picked up. It was horrible.
The request was for Google and the like to crack down on these ads.
I suppose there is the question as to whether it's better for paedos to get their kicks from a computer screen rather than going out for the real thing? But I doubt it works that way and kids will still be harmed.
dl
I came across one years ago when I was doing some research into safety of kids wearing seat belts on school buses; I suppose the word "children" was picked up. It was horrible.
The request was for Google and the like to crack down on these ads.
I suppose there is the question as to whether it's better for paedos to get their kicks from a computer screen rather than going out for the real thing? But I doubt it works that way and kids will still be harmed.
dl
#15
Scooby Regular
Know what you're saying mate but it ain't really that simple, as the guys mentioned above. It's a mess alright though!
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO the Internet needs censoring. If thats possible, i don't know. There is the rumpus about JLO's *** on BGT, yet easily, and without much effort you can stumble accross some pretty sick (but legal) stuff.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kings Norton, birmingham
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While i quite agree about restricting or trying to make this type of **** nigh on impossible to view , to me, its just the thin edge to a slippery slope. If its successful, whats next on the list? This argument has gone on for years and will continue until the do gooders get their way cos yet another sicko looked at images . yes, images were found on his pc , but it was his weak personality that he acted on. The images were just the catalyst to make him carry out this abhorrent crime.As guys ,and women dont forget, we all look at **** to a greater or lesser degree but that dont make us all go out and rape women . If its in somebodies psyche to commit horrendous crimes , they will, whether they watch the stuff or not
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Kings Norton, birmingham
Posts: 1,094
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This all makes it sound like , since the advent of the internet , all of mans [or a certain percentage of them] evil thoughts and actions have been turned on. It wasnt around when saville and sickos like him were doing what they did so what was their excuse? Dirty b...ards one and all , no matter what age the victims are .
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swilling coffee at my lab bench
Posts: 9,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No, absolutely not. They may try, and the 'great firewall' may deter casual browsing, but as a way to actually prevent determined people from accessing blocked material it's a spectacular failure - just as any such scheme was always guaranteed to be.
#25
People who think that censoring the internet works or could be made to work just show a complete misunderstanding of how information travels on the net.
If it was just a case of banning www.kiddyfiddlers.com then yes, it might be possible....however people devious enough to be looking for this sort of thing dont use normal websites.
Illicit material, whether its ****, stolen credit card details or the new Daft Punk album flows around the globe in waves via bit torrent, news groups and the deep web. None of this is traceable or stoppable. ever.
At the shallow end of the spectrum, I downloaded The Bourne Legacy (load of **** btw!) last night. All my ISP knows is that 750mb of data arrived at my computer from dozens of different sources around the globe.....it has no idea the content of that data or exactly where it came from.
There is no way that could have been stopped. Sure, they can find wherever The Pirate Bay is being hosted and shut down the servers, but that wont stop anything mainly because the films etc are not there, they are distributed in small chunks around the world on individual computer, besides it will just pop up somewhere else within a couple of days anyway.
The internet just physically CAN'T be censored. I am sitting here in France watching BBC iPlayer...it only took a few mouse clicks to get around the block BBC have on foreign viewers. There will always be a way around anything that is imposed.
Morally, its not possible either. No normal person wants kiddy **** to be available, but where do you draw the line and who decides what is to be made available to us proles?
kids - wrong.
BDSM between consenting adults? - technically its illegal to view this in France. Why? who decided that? and what will they take a dislike to next? Its not a slippery slope, once censorship starts its a vertical drop.
If it was just a case of banning www.kiddyfiddlers.com then yes, it might be possible....however people devious enough to be looking for this sort of thing dont use normal websites.
Illicit material, whether its ****, stolen credit card details or the new Daft Punk album flows around the globe in waves via bit torrent, news groups and the deep web. None of this is traceable or stoppable. ever.
At the shallow end of the spectrum, I downloaded The Bourne Legacy (load of **** btw!) last night. All my ISP knows is that 750mb of data arrived at my computer from dozens of different sources around the globe.....it has no idea the content of that data or exactly where it came from.
There is no way that could have been stopped. Sure, they can find wherever The Pirate Bay is being hosted and shut down the servers, but that wont stop anything mainly because the films etc are not there, they are distributed in small chunks around the world on individual computer, besides it will just pop up somewhere else within a couple of days anyway.
The internet just physically CAN'T be censored. I am sitting here in France watching BBC iPlayer...it only took a few mouse clicks to get around the block BBC have on foreign viewers. There will always be a way around anything that is imposed.
Morally, its not possible either. No normal person wants kiddy **** to be available, but where do you draw the line and who decides what is to be made available to us proles?
kids - wrong.
BDSM between consenting adults? - technically its illegal to view this in France. Why? who decided that? and what will they take a dislike to next? Its not a slippery slope, once censorship starts its a vertical drop.
Last edited by David_Dickson; 01 June 2013 at 07:55 AM.
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Grantham
Posts: 1,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=f1_fan;11106193]While this discussion is all very well do we actually believe that viewng these sort of images turns someone into a murdering paedophile as that is the implcation by these charities.
Don't know - ask April
Don't know - ask April
#27
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
People who think that censoring the internet works or could be made to work just show a complete misunderstanding of how information travels on the net.
If it was just a case of banning www.kiddyfiddlers.com then yes, it might be possible....however people devious enough to be looking for this sort of thing dont use normal websites.
Illicit material, whether its ****, stolen credit card details or the new Daft Punk album flows around the globe in waves via bit torrent, news groups and the deep web. None of this is traceable or stoppable. ever.
At the shallow end of the spectrum, I downloaded The Bourne Legacy (load of **** btw!) last night. All my ISP knows is that 750mb of data arrived at my computer from dozens of different sources around the globe.....it has no idea the content of that data or exactly where it came from.
There is no way that could have been stopped. Sure, they can find wherever The Pirate Bay is being hosted and shut down the servers, but that wont stop anything mainly because the films etc are not there, they are distributed in small chunks around the world on individual computer, besides it will just pop up somewhere else within a couple of days anyway.
The internet just physically CAN'T be censored. I am sitting here in France watching BBC iPlayer...it only took a few mouse clicks to get around the block BBC have on foreign viewers. There will always be a way around anything that is imposed.
Morally, its not possible either. No normal person wants kiddy **** to be available, but where do you draw the line and who decides what is to be made available to us proles?
kids - wrong.
BDSM between consenting adults? - technically its illegal to view this in France. Why? who decided that? and what will they take a dislike to next? Its not a slippery slope, once censorship starts its a vertical drop.
If it was just a case of banning www.kiddyfiddlers.com then yes, it might be possible....however people devious enough to be looking for this sort of thing dont use normal websites.
Illicit material, whether its ****, stolen credit card details or the new Daft Punk album flows around the globe in waves via bit torrent, news groups and the deep web. None of this is traceable or stoppable. ever.
At the shallow end of the spectrum, I downloaded The Bourne Legacy (load of **** btw!) last night. All my ISP knows is that 750mb of data arrived at my computer from dozens of different sources around the globe.....it has no idea the content of that data or exactly where it came from.
There is no way that could have been stopped. Sure, they can find wherever The Pirate Bay is being hosted and shut down the servers, but that wont stop anything mainly because the films etc are not there, they are distributed in small chunks around the world on individual computer, besides it will just pop up somewhere else within a couple of days anyway.
The internet just physically CAN'T be censored. I am sitting here in France watching BBC iPlayer...it only took a few mouse clicks to get around the block BBC have on foreign viewers. There will always be a way around anything that is imposed.
Morally, its not possible either. No normal person wants kiddy **** to be available, but where do you draw the line and who decides what is to be made available to us proles?
kids - wrong.
BDSM between consenting adults? - technically its illegal to view this in France. Why? who decided that? and what will they take a dislike to next? Its not a slippery slope, once censorship starts its a vertical drop.
Last edited by CharlySkunkWeed; 01 June 2013 at 10:45 AM.