Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Oh dear, more Boeing Dreamliner woes.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08 January 2013, 02:03 PM
  #1  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Oh dear, more Boeing Dreamliner woes.

Another electrical problem for Boeing to sort out..

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20942484

last year..

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-20716997

Last edited by Oldun; 08 January 2013 at 02:05 PM.
Old 16 January 2013, 08:43 AM
  #2  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Now JAL and ANA have grounded all of their dreamliners..

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/dreamliner-...004638990.html
Old 16 January 2013, 08:43 AM
  #3  
ReallyReallyGoodMeat
Scooby Regular
 
ReallyReallyGoodMeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Wouldn't want to be holding Boeing shares right now...
Old 16 January 2013, 08:44 AM
  #4  
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Tidgy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Notts
Posts: 23,118
Received 150 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

yeah, they sound like there not realy ready for service yet. I'm still amazed the american aviation authority has stated they wont get involved unless theres an accident
Old 16 January 2013, 08:58 AM
  #5  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are so desparate to beat Airbus, it makes you wonder if they are short-cutting testing too much.
Every radical aircraft will have problems but the Dreamliner seems to have a lot of electricals to sort out.
Old 16 January 2013, 11:37 AM
  #6  
Funkii Munkii
Pontificating
 
Funkii Munkii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conrod Straight
Posts: 11,574
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Do you remember Boeing sacking a handful of senior staff that came out and said the design was dangerous a few years back ?

This plane could destroy Boeing, I bet Airbus are going flat out on the A-350
Old 16 January 2013, 12:24 PM
  #7  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, that was over the 'plastic' fuselage.
Got to love the last line in this article..
http://seattletimes.com/html/boeinga...boeing180.html

Here might be the underlying cause, very disturbing..
http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb...ltzik-20110215

Boeing does a rough design, hands it to sub-contractors who do a more detailed design and then they sub-contract to manufacturers, parts are shipped to Boeing who find that components don't fit together.
Nothing wrong with subbing, but to fail to give precise specs is not good practice.
Old 16 January 2013, 02:39 PM
  #8  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It sounds like a bag of nails to me. Glad I have not got anything to do with it!

Les
Old 17 January 2013, 09:13 AM
  #9  
ReallyReallyGoodMeat
Scooby Regular
 
ReallyReallyGoodMeat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,915
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Grounded indefinitely by the FAA in the US - sounds pretty serious!

http://www.cnbc.com/id/100385850
Old 17 January 2013, 09:24 AM
  #10  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Better to do it than risk a major disaster.

That must damage Boeing's reputation and will need some serious confidence rebuilding.
Old 17 January 2013, 03:33 PM
  #11  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Now banned from flying by EASA and grounded worldwide.

http://news.sky.com/story/1038642/bo...ross-the-world
Old 06 February 2013, 05:52 PM
  #12  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Still no solution to the problems..
http://www.usatoday.com/story/travel...liner/1895297/
Old 06 February 2013, 06:56 PM
  #13  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

mmmm, Thermal Runaway - it is a common problem in laptops too
Old 06 February 2013, 07:46 PM
  #14  
J4CKO
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
J4CKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 19,384
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Could this cause Boeing to go bust ?
Old 06 February 2013, 08:13 PM
  #15  
zip106
Scooby Regular
 
zip106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: ....
Posts: 6,621
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hopefully Bombardier will benefit from this - they could have had the lithium battery in their C-series planes but have now developed a better alternative.
Old 06 February 2013, 08:25 PM
  #16  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by J4CKO
Could this cause Boeing to go bust ?
Nah. They still have good orders for the 777 and the 747-8 should take a fair few orders aswell.
Old 07 February 2013, 08:01 AM
  #17  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Airbus were planning to use the same batteries in their A350 but they have a Plan B just in case....

http://in.reuters.com/article/2013/0...91003820130201
Old 07 February 2013, 08:25 AM
  #18  
cster
Scooby Regular
 
cster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,753
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
Nah. They still have good orders for the 777 and the 747-8 should take a fair few orders aswell.
Are they still making 747s?
Formidable!
Old 07 February 2013, 09:17 AM
  #19  
^Qwerty^
Scooby Regular
 
^Qwerty^'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: East Yorkshire
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 25 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Link stolen from another forum:

http://www.wimp.com/approachlanding/

A380 in to SFO

At the start ATC mentions a visual approach, then changes/corrects it for ILS vectors. Don't know what the work load difference is, but the captain didn't look too happy about it. Would that have meant switches from IFR to VFR?

I have a friend who flies 757's, and I'm pretty sure he has to fly so many manual approaches. However, I'm not sure if that means looking out the window and using PAPI lights for example, or if he has to manualy follow the ILS glideslope rather than using the autopilot do everything? There is a massive difference.

Sorry, nothing to do with the subject of course.
Old 07 February 2013, 09:37 AM
  #20  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Interesting watch thanks, we fly one those Charles De gaulle - Joburg last month

Iv no idea whether it was manual, we hardly knew we were down that's for sure

Sailing San fransisco bay too, lucky bugger

Last edited by dpb; 07 February 2013 at 09:40 AM.
Old 07 February 2013, 12:23 PM
  #21  
Funkii Munkii
Pontificating
 
Funkii Munkii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conrod Straight
Posts: 11,574
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
Nah. They still have good orders for the 777 and the 747-8 should take a fair few orders aswell.
Just ask Cargolux and Northwest what they think of the new 747-8F's

The projected costs for fuel burn were way off they are no more economic than a old 747-4F, the problem is when companies like Cargolux order these planes they build their long term tariffs based on info from Boeing, seems their projections were way off.

At least the triple 7 is saving their bacon, great aircraft btw for cargo and passengers alike.
Old 07 February 2013, 12:38 PM
  #22  
Moley
Sponsor
iTrader: (9)
 
Moley's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 10,884
Received 24 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Didn't reaslise that about the 747-8

Agree about the 777
Old 07 February 2013, 02:57 PM
  #23  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The good old "Tin Triangle" was an all electric aircraft,including the flying controls. It first came into service in 1957 and remained until 1981.

My experience on it was for 12 years and I never had any major unserviceability which frightened me with it.

If I was offered a trip on it today I would just say "lead me to it"

Les
Old 09 February 2013, 11:50 AM
  #24  
jbl
Scooby Regular
 
jbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Northamptonshire
Posts: 975
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Just to add, we have just returned from a long haul flight on the 777 ER Air France and the landing on both legs was really smooth and easy, don't know if it was pilot or technology but it was good. 'Plane nice and quiet.
We were planning on Mexico for next winter and using the Dreamliner PE class. Will still go to Mexico (all being well) but not sure about the Dreamliner !!!! Will wait and see but Boeing have one huge passenger confidence hill to clinb.

JBL
Old 09 February 2013, 01:11 PM
  #25  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Still no immediate remedy, planes being produced are now clogging up the factory apron.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/...9170R420130208

It's a very sad situation, I always had great respect for Boeing, but it seems that their present policy of subcontracting and rushing in for new technology is failing them.
Old 09 February 2013, 03:26 PM
  #26  
Funkii Munkii
Pontificating
 
Funkii Munkii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conrod Straight
Posts: 11,574
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Oldun
but it seems that their present policy of subcontracting and rushing in for new technology is failing them.
Understatement ! As I said their own staff raised these issues 5 years ago and were sacked for speaking openly about it. You reap what you sow.
Old 09 February 2013, 03:33 PM
  #27  
Funkii Munkii
Pontificating
 
Funkii Munkii's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Conrod Straight
Posts: 11,574
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Whoops Double Bubble

Last edited by Funkii Munkii; 09 February 2013 at 03:34 PM.
Old 14 March 2013, 08:53 AM
  #28  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The Dreamliner problems are a bit nearer to getting solved.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21764282

Who will be the first airline to begin litigation?
This will cost Boeing a fortune in cash and loss of confidence.

It's a pity to see a major manufacturer in this position.
Old 14 March 2013, 02:35 PM
  #29  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,032
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Whilst a pity, I can't help thinking it was similar sitautions in the past with other aircraft maunfactrurers that allowed Boeing to gain market dominance.

I.e A manufacturer tries something new, gets their fingers burnt and the competitors pick up on the lessons learnt to get a step ahead.
Old 14 March 2013, 02:48 PM
  #30  
Oldun
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Oldun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Under a flightpath
Posts: 1,413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

True and Airbus are benefitting from this, their new A350 is just around the corner and was going to use those batteries, they have a plan B ready in case these batteries are a no-go after testing.


Quick Reply: Oh dear, more Boeing Dreamliner woes.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:39 PM.