Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Fixed penalty fines to rise to £90

Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:15 PM
  #1  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default Fixed penalty fines to rise to £90

Fixed penalty fines to rise to £90

More revenue raising from Cameron and his coalition of crooked *****!
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:46 PM
  #2  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

Ahhhh, the ever increasing persecution of the great British motorist. *sigh*

Shooting fish in a barrel.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:48 PM
  #3  
Gear Head's Avatar
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Default

You speed and get caught - You pay. Quite simple really.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:50 PM
  #4  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

You never break the speed limit - whether by accident or design?

If/when you do, do you regard yourself as a danger to yourself and/or other road users/pedestrians?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:52 PM
  #5  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Should round it up to a ton


Except for people on the phone , who should be horse whipped as well
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:52 PM
  #6  
Gear Head's Avatar
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
You never break the speed limit - whether by accident or design?

If/when you do, do you regard yourself as a danger to yourself and/or other road users/pedestrians?
Never said I didn't. If I get caught though, it's my own fault.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 12:53 PM
  #7  
Gear Head's Avatar
Gear Head
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in Kent, sniffing some V-Power
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Should round it up to a ton


Except for people on the phone , who should be horse whipped as well
Agreed.
Reply

Trending Topics

Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #8  
urban's Avatar
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,566
Likes: 1
From: Never you mind
Default

Pity the revenue never seems to go into fixing the ******* roads
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:05 PM
  #9  
Terminator X's Avatar
Terminator X
Owner of SNet
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,513
Likes: 0
From: Berkshire
Default

50% increase, must be following the pay rise trend over the last few years

TX.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:09 PM
  #10  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

Originally Posted by Gear Head
Never said I didn't. If I get caught though, it's my own fault.
Agreed.

...But it's the principle of the perpetual persecution of the motorist simply because they're a readily-available, 'easy-to-catch' target in their millions = #ker-ching#.

'Safety' my ****.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:11 PM
  #11  
petethemeat's Avatar
petethemeat
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Lancs
Default

Hopefully this "consultation" on this proposal will disagree - not likely though
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:17 PM
  #12  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Think you ned to read the link lads, this isn't just about speeding, but extending it to careless driving, passing on the nearside, taligating or even braking suddenly. It is also about making it easier (less paperwork) for the police to issue tickets.

What better way to rasie some more money for the politicians''s fraudulent expense claims to be paid out than to make ticket issuing easy and include a raft of very subjective offences in the list for which a ticket can be issued.

I believe it is also soon to be extended to wearing a loud shirt in a built up area, loitering with inetnet to use a zebra crossing and being in possession of an ugly wife*

Copright NTNOCN 1980

Last edited by f1_fan; Jun 14, 2012 at 01:18 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:23 PM
  #13  
TelBoy's Avatar
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
From: God's promised land
Default

Please can they make the fine £1,000 for driving in the third lane of a four lane motorway, when one, if not two lanes to their left are free. Either that or a firing squad.


Personally i don't see why £90 is a bad idea, especially if it could be proved that the revenue went into the roads. Mobile phone use ought to be £150 in my opinion, and texting personally i'd make it £500 and an automatic ban.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:28 PM
  #14  
CREWJ's Avatar
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 1
From: Aberdare / Daventry
Default

There are many ways to look at this, whether it's comparing it to inflation and showing that it's a large hike in cost. Or the fact that it shouldn't really matter because unless you go out and get fined regularly it shouldn't effect you.

Personally I don't have a problem with it. If you don't break the law then you don't get fined. No problem.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:30 PM
  #15  
Midlife......'s Avatar
Midlife......
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,583
Likes: 4
Default

Nope........no such thing as hypothecated taxation / fines in the UK. It all goes into one big pot

Shaun
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:30 PM
  #16  
tony de wonderful's Avatar
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Default

Is the any evidence that speed cameras and other devices reduce road accidents and deaths?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:32 PM
  #17  
joz8968's Avatar
joz8968
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,764
Likes: 9
From: Leicester
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
... believe it is also soon to be extended to wearing a loud shirt in a built up area, loitering with inetnet to use a zebra crossing and being in possession of an ugly wife*

Copright NTNOCN 1980
"offensive wife"



"...A Mr... Co-do-gooo?! Of 55 Mercer Road..."


I better not mention the rest.

Last edited by joz8968; Jun 14, 2012 at 02:53 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 01:35 PM
  #18  
EddScott's Avatar
EddScott
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12,575
Likes: 65
From: West Wales
Default

Originally Posted by dpb


Except for people on the phone , who should be horse whipped as well
Usually committed by quite fit looking hairdresser type birds so a seperate lottery for male tax payers to do the whipping.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:03 PM
  #19  
zip106's Avatar
zip106
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,623
Likes: 1
From: ....
Default

And you last saw a copper driving around to issue these fines when, exactly?
I very rarely see one, but I regularly see driving behaviour that warrants the increased fine.
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:41 PM
  #20  
GC8's Avatar
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
From: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
I believe it is also soon to be extended to wearing a loud shirt in a built up area, loitering with intent to use a zebra crossing and being in possession of an ugly wife*

Being in posession of an ugly wife is punishment enough in itself, shirely?
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 02:44 PM
  #21  
CREWJ's Avatar
CREWJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 5,365
Likes: 1
From: Aberdare / Daventry
Default

Originally Posted by GC8
Being in posession of an ugly wife is punishment enough in itself, shirely?
Also, don't call f1_fan Shirley
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 03:13 PM
  #22  
TelBoy's Avatar
TelBoy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
From: God's promised land
Default

He didn't
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 09:42 PM
  #23  
boomer's Avatar
boomer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
From: West Midlands
Default

Meanwhile driving without insurance has the fines raised to a massive £300 a pop - not much of a deterrent if the crim is saving severalteen hundred pounds a year on their policy!

mb
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 09:49 PM
  #24  
petethemeat's Avatar
petethemeat
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Lancs
Default

Originally Posted by boomer
Meanwhile driving without insurance has the fines raised to a massive £300 a pop - not much of a deterrent if the crim is saving severalteen hundred pounds a year on their policy!

mb
But there is a high almost certain probability of a ban too (unless they decided to ignore that too!) I hate un insured drivers !
Reply
Old Jun 14, 2012 | 11:53 PM
  #25  
markjmd's Avatar
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 70
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Think you ned to read the link lads, this isn't just about speeding, but extending it to careless driving, passing on the nearside, taligating or even braking suddenly. It is also about making it easier (less paperwork) for the police to issue tickets.
The person who needs to read your link is YOU! But since you didn't seem capable of grasping the salient points by yourself first time round, I'll highlight them for you now.

Firstly, it says "motoring fines may rise to £90".

Second, it says "Ministers are seeking views from the public on the proposals, which would apply to England, Scotland and Wales, before deciding whether to pursue them."

To sum up then, if you were really bothered, your time in launching this thread would have been far better spent in putting forward your views on the consultation website, and encouraging the rest of us to do the same.

Sermon over, amen


ps
Personally I look forward to the day where d!ckheads who sit up my @rse on the motorway or other roads when I'm already driving as fast as conditions allow get stung in the pocket for their exceptional moronicness.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:10 AM
  #26  
Lee247's Avatar
Lee247
SN Fairy Godmother
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
From: Far Far Away
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd


ps
Personally I look forward to the day where d!ckheads who sit up my @rse on the motorway or other roads when I'm already driving as fast as conditions allow get stung in the pocket for their exceptional moronicness.
So do I, but whenever I get said moron on the bum end of my car, there is never any law about. Yet when I am on a quiet road, possibly going 3 over the 30 limit with not a soul in sight, lily law is hiding in the bushes.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:52 AM
  #27  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
The person who needs to read your link is YOU! But since you didn't seem capable of grasping the salient points by yourself first time round, I'll highlight them for you now.
If you want to waste yet more of your time writing another load of your usual dull useless nonsense then that is up to you

Ah so you do ...

Originally Posted by markjmd
Firstly, it says "motoring fines may rise to £90".

Second, it says "Ministers are seeking views from the public on the proposals, which would apply to England, Scotland and Wales, before deciding whether to pursue them."
Sorry but for a minute their I actually believed you had been suckered by your beloved Tories into thinking your views might actually be listened to and that they haven't like all governments decided already exactly what they are going to do.

Originally Posted by markjmd
To sum up then, if you were really bothered, your time in launching this thread would have been far better spent in putting forward your views on the consultation website, and encouraging the rest of us to do the same.
F**k me, you have... you really are that stupid!

Originally Posted by markjmd
Sermon over, amen
Sermon, more like a wet behind the ears fifth former's essay

Originally Posted by markjmd
ps
Personally I look forward to the day where d!ckheads who sit up my @rse on the motorway or other roads when I'm already driving as fast as conditions allow get stung in the pocket for their exceptional moronicness.
Maybe your driving ability like your reasonaing ability is just that poor that they could drive much faste than you quite safely in which case why not get out of their way?

Just saying
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:58 AM
  #28  
markjmd's Avatar
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 70
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
... ...

Just misspelling, typo-ing, generally getting stuff totally wrong
EFA.
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 12:59 AM
  #29  
f1_fan's Avatar
f1_fan
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
EFA.
Whatever you thick ****!

Last edited by f1_fan; Jun 15, 2012 at 01:07 AM. Reason: Edited to add the SN reqd emoticons so it gets classed as banter like all the gay and racist jibes on here
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2012 | 01:12 AM
  #30  
markjmd's Avatar
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Likes: 70
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Whatever you thick ****!
I bow to the man's obviously superior intellect and wit
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 AM.