Passenger aircraft rolls 140 degrees
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Passenger aircraft rolls 140 degrees
ANA passenger aircraft rolls after the co pilot flicks the wrong switch
What the heck was this single switch then? Maverick/Iceman mode on|off ?
http://video.uk.msn.com/watch/video/...tokyo/2g5lgcf0
What the heck was this single switch then? Maverick/Iceman mode on|off ?
http://video.uk.msn.com/watch/video/...tokyo/2g5lgcf0
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
First Office hit the rudder trim switch switch, which is 10cm away from the cockpit door open switch. He was just letting the Capt back in from a toilet break.
He probably needed another one after that!
He probably needed another one after that!
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: RIP Tam.
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Theres a design fault if I ever heard one. Important buttons like the cockpit door open should be kept away from the rudder buttons
#9
I was in a 'plane that dropped a 1000 feet (maybe more) according to the pilot. I thought I was going to die and did not want to get back on a 'plane again after that.
Pilot came on, said sorry, said something about unexpected pocket of air (?) whilst everyone was looking very sick and very scared.
Off for a 10 hour flight tomorrow (Sunday), wish me luck!
Pilot came on, said sorry, said something about unexpected pocket of air (?) whilst everyone was looking very sick and very scared.
Off for a 10 hour flight tomorrow (Sunday), wish me luck!
#10
Scooby Senior
Could a passenger plane really roll fast enough for the G to keep people seated?
I can't believe for a second that not many passengers knew. Surely to maintain pos G it would have to have been a fairly violent roll.
All of this is guessing as the only thing i know about flying is how to get the attention of the trolly dollies to acquire another drink
I can't believe for a second that not many passengers knew. Surely to maintain pos G it would have to have been a fairly violent roll.
All of this is guessing as the only thing i know about flying is how to get the attention of the trolly dollies to acquire another drink
#11
Scooby Regular
Yes they can, it's all about the position of the centre of the roll.
There is a very famous film of Tex Johnson, performing a full 360 degree roll whilst demonstrating the all new Boeing 707. The guests and crew aboard remained in their seats throughout.
Here it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vHiYA6Dmws
There is a very famous film of Tex Johnson, performing a full 360 degree roll whilst demonstrating the all new Boeing 707. The guests and crew aboard remained in their seats throughout.
Here it is
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vHiYA6Dmws
#14
Scooby Senior
Yes they can, it's all about the position of the centre of the roll.
There is a very famous film of Tex Johnson, performing a full 360 degree roll whilst demonstrating the all new Boeing 707. The guests and crew aboard remained in their seats throughout.
Here it is
There is a very famous film of Tex Johnson, performing a full 360 degree roll whilst demonstrating the all new Boeing 707. The guests and crew aboard remained in their seats throughout.
Here it is
As a passenger though - you must be very aware that the plane is rolling though?
#15
Scooby Regular
Not sure, I've never been in one. I don't hink
But I would suspect that if the aircraft maintained about +1g and you had no external references (night-time, closed windows), you would probably detect some movement but possbly not how much
I think Les may be the man to answer this one for us
But I would suspect that if the aircraft maintained about +1g and you had no external references (night-time, closed windows), you would probably detect some movement but possbly not how much
I think Les may be the man to answer this one for us
#17
Modern air liners are actually quite agile. So yes quite easy to keep +ve g.
Also, in the dark, with lowish g loads its hard to keep your orientation, even more so in the cabin. Plenty of crashes have been attributed to pilots losing their orientation.
Most modern aircraft have a 'bank limit' set into the auto pilot.
So you never really get into high angles but they can still be thrown around if the pilot relay wants too.
Also, in the dark, with lowish g loads its hard to keep your orientation, even more so in the cabin. Plenty of crashes have been attributed to pilots losing their orientation.
Most modern aircraft have a 'bank limit' set into the auto pilot.
So you never really get into high angles but they can still be thrown around if the pilot relay wants too.
#18
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I looked at the official flight report (in Japanese PDF) and the picture shows two very different switches. Translation courtesy of Google so may be way off, but how would you get this mistaken for each other?
The flight data looks like some rollercoaster of a ride! , to me, that looks like they pulled close to 3G?
The flight data looks like some rollercoaster of a ride! , to me, that looks like they pulled close to 3G?
#19
Only just seen this. The video wont work for me unfortunately.
I dont understand the term "trim ladder switch" If they mean the rudder trim control switch then I can understand that if he held it over for a specific amount of time, that would apply a rudder force. If that caused the autopilot to disengage than the aircraft might roll towards the direction that the trim was applied fairly slowly and one would also feel a sideways force due to the aircraft's sideslip. That may not have registered to the pilot at the time.
If the first officer was not paying attention to the aircraft attitude then it might roll fairly slowly towards the inverted. He would be being well in the wrong to allow that to happen of course. The nose would drop and the aircraft would eventually enter a spiral dive if there was no recovery action. Recovery would involve pretty positive control movements to restore the aircraft to straight and level flight and could well involve highish G forces. That would depend on the pilot's style of using the controls during the recovery. I see that the Mach no. did not get all that high which was pretty fortunate and the indicated air speed also did not increase too badly. The nose low pitch must have been recovered fairly quickly. Maybe he used speedbrakes as well.
140 degrees of roll is fairly high, also depending on how low the nose dropped at the time. not irrecoverable luckily, I have many times had a Vulcan banked to 180 degrees of roll as a matter of course during displays. I always kept the nose on the horizon until the aircraft was recovering to a lesser angle of bank on the exit of a wingover.
It may well be that the aircraft got to that position due to unintended application of rudder trim with the autopilot disconnected while the operating pilots attention was distracted while trying to unlock the door.
Not a very good thing to happen on an airliner of course and they were all pretty lucky to get away with it.
Les
I dont understand the term "trim ladder switch" If they mean the rudder trim control switch then I can understand that if he held it over for a specific amount of time, that would apply a rudder force. If that caused the autopilot to disengage than the aircraft might roll towards the direction that the trim was applied fairly slowly and one would also feel a sideways force due to the aircraft's sideslip. That may not have registered to the pilot at the time.
If the first officer was not paying attention to the aircraft attitude then it might roll fairly slowly towards the inverted. He would be being well in the wrong to allow that to happen of course. The nose would drop and the aircraft would eventually enter a spiral dive if there was no recovery action. Recovery would involve pretty positive control movements to restore the aircraft to straight and level flight and could well involve highish G forces. That would depend on the pilot's style of using the controls during the recovery. I see that the Mach no. did not get all that high which was pretty fortunate and the indicated air speed also did not increase too badly. The nose low pitch must have been recovered fairly quickly. Maybe he used speedbrakes as well.
140 degrees of roll is fairly high, also depending on how low the nose dropped at the time. not irrecoverable luckily, I have many times had a Vulcan banked to 180 degrees of roll as a matter of course during displays. I always kept the nose on the horizon until the aircraft was recovering to a lesser angle of bank on the exit of a wingover.
It may well be that the aircraft got to that position due to unintended application of rudder trim with the autopilot disconnected while the operating pilots attention was distracted while trying to unlock the door.
Not a very good thing to happen on an airliner of course and they were all pretty lucky to get away with it.
Les
#23
Holy crap! The data is not good to see! 3G for 30 seconds, not a *lot* but it is a lot for a pax airliner, IYSWIM!
Also there are 2 clear spikes from 1G to 3G. Anyone stood up would struggle to stay on their feet thats for sure.
Its also worth mentioning that the average modern airliner is rated to about 3G. Some of the really new stuff is slightly higher, 3.5 ish, but thats about the max design limit. Actual operational limit will be much below this, at 2G approx. I would say they have been lucky not to have a structural failure of some kind.
There is also the issue of objects causing serious injury and damage at high bank / roll AND high G... objects very quickly become fast moving 100kg+ projectiles.
Also there are 2 clear spikes from 1G to 3G. Anyone stood up would struggle to stay on their feet thats for sure.
Its also worth mentioning that the average modern airliner is rated to about 3G. Some of the really new stuff is slightly higher, 3.5 ish, but thats about the max design limit. Actual operational limit will be much below this, at 2G approx. I would say they have been lucky not to have a structural failure of some kind.
There is also the issue of objects causing serious injury and damage at high bank / roll AND high G... objects very quickly become fast moving 100kg+ projectiles.
#25
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 3,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
22 December 2015 11:59 AM