Tata Steel to announce 1500 job cuts
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
how many jobs being lost at plants elsewhere in the world i wonder - another British company asset stripped and in the process of being fecked over...
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why should we, the tax payers, subsidise a loss making & inefficient business? If TATA thought they could make a go of it then good luck to them, if not then the inevitable happens Heavy industry is looking to be a distant memory for this country.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
TATA being Indian owned - we send: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/ge...Moon_missions/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12607537
"India spends £36bn a year on defence and £750m a year on its space programme," he says. "What's more, India is one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. It's completely unjustifiable, especially at this time."
Perhaps india should look after and feeds its poor staving and defenceless people first then before squandering money on the above!
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not exactly over the moon about my tax payments subsidising dole bludgers either I suppose in that respect HM Treasury could fund a loss making business and recoup some of that loss by reducing the spend on benefits. In fact that's not a bad idea, lets re-open the coal mines etc. and send the layabouts down there to do a decent days work
#9
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
As long as heavy industry keep migrating to China, the demand for steel processing in the UK will always be on the decrease.
Where I live, that steel was often used to make cars, motorbikes, chains, anchors, amongst various other types of forgings and industrial manufacture/assembly.
Very little of that left here.
Regardless of who owns what; if they aren't making money, cuts will be made and operations moved elsewhere or shut down; We are too reliant on our (demising) home markets and not exporting more than we import....we need to be doing the reverse; Like Germany, for example.
Where I live, that steel was often used to make cars, motorbikes, chains, anchors, amongst various other types of forgings and industrial manufacture/assembly.
Very little of that left here.
Regardless of who owns what; if they aren't making money, cuts will be made and operations moved elsewhere or shut down; We are too reliant on our (demising) home markets and not exporting more than we import....we need to be doing the reverse; Like Germany, for example.
#10
Not exactly over the moon about my tax payments subsidising dole bludgers either I suppose in that respect HM Treasury could fund a loss making business and recoup some of that loss by reducing the spend on benefits. In fact that's not a bad idea, lets re-open the coal mines etc. and send the layabouts down there to do a decent days work
#11
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
In fact that's not a bad idea, lets re-open the coal mines etc. and send the layabouts down there to do a decent days work
Just think of the NHS bill for all the injuries and health damage caused by working conditions (coal dust, accidents, etc).
Gotta think ahead when dealing with the workshy layabouts to make sure they don't find a way to wriggle out of working.
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hoping Jeffs lad is safe
From the Scunny Telegraph to give perspective on this... http://www.thisisscunthorpe.co.uk/ta...l/article.html
#15
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yep, we had a meeting on Tuesday with one of the Union head honcho's about this as well as our 3.5% payrise kicking in (can't be that hard up?) Supposedly lots of the grey stuff to be mined and will create lots of jobs. Also a biiiig order for tyre coil is bumping up profits in the Scunny Rod mill. BBM is one of the poorest performing sites on the works and there are 4 blast furnaces running currently.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: St Louis, Missouri. USA./Newcastle UK.
Posts: 3,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Conservative Government sadly started the demise in British Industry's in the 80's. Steel, Coal, Shipbuilding are mostly a thing of the past now.
Pleased your safe for now Andy and Steve but you will always be wondering if there is a future in your jobs.
Pleased your safe for now Andy and Steve but you will always be wondering if there is a future in your jobs.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 3,229
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm from Hartlepool, although have lived in Liverpool for 13 years now, but my bro works in the Hartlepool plant!!
#24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While it's easy for fans of the various governments of the last 30 years to blame cheaper labour abroad, decreasing domestic markets, foreign demand etc. the truth lies in the fact that no government in this country for the last 30 years has wanted to see the UK as a manufacturing nation.
It started with Thatcher and continued under Blair/Brown and now will more than lilely continue under Cameron.
The reason it doesn't wash as an excuse is simple of we look at our German cousins.They seem able to have a thriving manufacturing sector despite all this foreign competition.
It started with Thatcher and continued under Blair/Brown and now will more than lilely continue under Cameron.
The reason it doesn't wash as an excuse is simple of we look at our German cousins.They seem able to have a thriving manufacturing sector despite all this foreign competition.
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
While it's easy for fans of the various governments of the last 30 years to blame cheaper labour abroad, decreasing domestic markets, foreign demand etc. the truth lies in the fact that no government in this country for the last 30 years has wanted to see the UK as a manufacturing nation.
It started with Thatcher and continued under Blair/Brown and now will more than lilely continue under Cameron.
The reason it doesn't wash as an excuse is simple of we look at our German cousins.They seem able to have a thriving manufacturing sector despite all this foreign competition.
It started with Thatcher and continued under Blair/Brown and now will more than lilely continue under Cameron.
The reason it doesn't wash as an excuse is simple of we look at our German cousins.They seem able to have a thriving manufacturing sector despite all this foreign competition.
It does not help that we are operating under the pretence of free trade when in fact our trading partners in the East are doing everything in their power to manipulate things in their favour.
#26
Scooby Regular
the ultimate irony is that the british re-built the german economy (with US money but the structure by the British) in the late 40,s and 50,s -- VW was run by the British army for a time (and actually named VW by the british army)
they have a high quality, high skill economy, with massive state investment in education
we have a low quality, low skill, two tier economy --- and before you know it we will be a failed state
they have a high quality, high skill economy, with massive state investment in education
we have a low quality, low skill, two tier economy --- and before you know it we will be a failed state
Last edited by hodgy0_2; 20 May 2011 at 11:21 PM.
#27
We can never compete of cheap labour, but we have allowed unrestricted immigration and the large scale immigration of social groups who cause lots of trouble and will for generations.
To what end I'm not sure, just to add to the tills in consumer retail? Or to boost house prices?
Whatever way you looks at it, it was supreme folly.
I'm sure the UK is closer to massive social problems that it has been for centuries.
#28
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I fear it will go that way.
We can never compete of cheap labour, but we have allowed unrestricted immigration and the large scale immigration of social groups who cause lots of trouble and will for generations.
To what end I'm not sure, just to add to the tills in consumer retail? Or to boost house prices?
Whatever way you looks at it, it was supreme folly.
I'm sure the UK is closer to massive social problems that it has been for centuries.
We can never compete of cheap labour, but we have allowed unrestricted immigration and the large scale immigration of social groups who cause lots of trouble and will for generations.
To what end I'm not sure, just to add to the tills in consumer retail? Or to boost house prices?
Whatever way you looks at it, it was supreme folly.
I'm sure the UK is closer to massive social problems that it has been for centuries.
#29
Scooby Regular
Unfortunately this is what happens when you subsidise everyone by borrowing on their behalf. Why do we need to make steel? There's no point, the Chinese slaves will do it for us, as long as they lend us the money to buy it from them. Meanwhile we've got so many regulations and taxes in place that no one in their right mind would invest here. Want to make a profit, to produce something that you can then trade with others? Why, that's greedy and evil don't you know.
And by the way, subsidising the steelworks would be even worse. What's the point?
And by the way, subsidising the steelworks would be even worse. What's the point?
#30
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Doncaster, S. Yorks.
Posts: 21,415
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Had the official company memo today in the post with ironically, my wageslip
Just says that there will be discussions with regards to those who will be affected - I assume that's 100% of the staff then. IMHO some of the older boyos should be offered early retirement, half the management can go (too many chiefs) and there are a lot of useless contractors just claiming a wage for no work (this is NOT aimed at Jeffs lad!).
A little worried yeah, that's natural but I'm not seeing the point in crying into my pillow just yet. I really struggle to see the benefits to the company of getting rid of new blood that must cost a fortune to train up. Job cuts are needed, we know that here, but in a few years if things recover, many of the guys now will be 55-60+ with a huge age gap missing from the workforce. It would then IMHO cost them a lot more in bringing contractors/agency staff in to cover this aged black hole.
Just says that there will be discussions with regards to those who will be affected - I assume that's 100% of the staff then. IMHO some of the older boyos should be offered early retirement, half the management can go (too many chiefs) and there are a lot of useless contractors just claiming a wage for no work (this is NOT aimed at Jeffs lad!).
A little worried yeah, that's natural but I'm not seeing the point in crying into my pillow just yet. I really struggle to see the benefits to the company of getting rid of new blood that must cost a fortune to train up. Job cuts are needed, we know that here, but in a few years if things recover, many of the guys now will be 55-60+ with a huge age gap missing from the workforce. It would then IMHO cost them a lot more in bringing contractors/agency staff in to cover this aged black hole.