Gay guys kicked out a pub for kissing
16 April 2011, 09:47 AM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Gay guys kicked out a pub for kissing
I can only think of Soho, Brighton and possibly some parts of Manchester where gay people could organise a protest on getting kicked out a pub for kissing. If it happened in Glasgow or most other parts I'm sure it would kick off into a street battle.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13096519
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-13096519
16 April 2011, 10:44 AM
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Landlord was probably committing a criminal offence in that he can throw out who he likes but not on the grounds of sexual orientation.
I'll make no further comment
dl
I'll make no further comment
dl
16 April 2011, 11:29 AM
#7
I am fairly pro gay rights but to be honest I dont want to see anyone snogging in a pub, there was a couple in the cinema when I was in Brighton last week, they were a straight couple (surprisingly given the area) and it made me uncomfortable sat behind them (really spoilt my **** 
)
So, really, the last thing Gay rights needs is gay men openly getting intimate in a pub and then protesting about it, the landlord had every right to kick them out, I beleive "Get a room" is the phrase.
)So, really, the last thing Gay rights needs is gay men openly getting intimate in a pub and then protesting about it, the landlord had every right to kick them out, I beleive "Get a room" is the phrase.
Trending Topics
16 April 2011, 11:48 AM
#9
My thoughts exactly. (Refers to J4CKO's post, not DYK's 
), Gays now have many, many rights, probably more than us heteros.
So WHY do they still feel the need for gay rights marches and stuff like this?
I don't need a hetero rights march, are they so unsure of their sexuality they need a march to prove it?
), Gays now have many, many rights, probably more than us heteros.So WHY do they still feel the need for gay rights marches and stuff like this?
I don't need a hetero rights march, are they so unsure of their sexuality they need a march to prove it?
16 April 2011, 12:21 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My thoughts exactly. (Refers to J4CKO's post, not DYK's ), Gays now have many, many rights, probably more than us heteros.
So WHY do they still feel the need for gay rights marches and stuff like this?
I don't need a hetero rights march, are they so unsure of their sexuality they need a march to prove it?
), Gays now have many, many rights, probably more than us heteros.So WHY do they still feel the need for gay rights marches and stuff like this?
I don't need a hetero rights march, are they so unsure of their sexuality they need a march to prove it?
Even Scottish/Welsh devolution was a manifestation of this.
get a room ffs.
16 April 2011, 02:17 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
That's ok you as a Man are the way nature intended you to be,and that's attracted to Females,so seeing two sexy girls kissing turns you on.It would also give me a massive boner and want to join in...
16 April 2011, 02:20 PM
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dull White BMW
Posts: 5,052
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone can go into a gay pub. You might not want to but you can. I've been in a few bars on Canal Street with my wife and her friends in Manchester and they are much more relaxed places that the Townie bars in Piccadilly. I didn't use the toilets though!
Steve
Steve
16 April 2011, 02:45 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: If you're not braking or accelerating you're wasting time.
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16 April 2011, 04:25 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
I don't think it's that modern an issue. Some people would argue the jews were probably the first to form themselves into this special group of 'victims'
16 April 2011, 07:33 PM
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nobody granted the Jews special rights under the hegemony of the state, they were not 'owned' by the state like modern 'groups' are.
16 April 2011, 07:36 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
16 April 2011, 07:49 PM
#23
Scooby Regular
16 April 2011, 07:57 PM
#25
Scooby Regular
Well they formed maybe the first collectivism, but the 'groups' you hear of nowadays are only 'groups' because the light of the state shines on them making them so. Not sure what you mean by 'victims' BTW. Judaism was a religious collective.
Nobody granted the Jews special rights under the hegemony of the state, they were not 'owned' by the state like modern 'groups' are.
Nobody granted the Jews special rights under the hegemony of the state, they were not 'owned' by the state like modern 'groups' are.
1)Probably the same thing as you meant by victims?
2) Nobody has granted homosexuals 'special rights'. My understanding is that 'they' have been fighting for equal rights in the eyes of the state and legal system.
Nobody granted Jews special rights, they granted it to themselves by self proclaiming themselves as the 'chosen people' in ancient times.
The state of Israel now seems to have given itself special rights in that it believes it is above international law
16 April 2011, 08:05 PM
#26
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1)Probably the same thing as you meant by victims?
2) Nobody has granted homosexuals 'special rights'. My understanding is that 'they' have been fighting for equal rights in the eyes of the state and legal system.
Nobody granted Jews special rights, they granted it to themselves by self proclaiming themselves as the 'chosen people' in ancient times.
The state of Israel now seems to have given itself special rights in that it believes it is above international law
2) Nobody has granted homosexuals 'special rights'. My understanding is that 'they' have been fighting for equal rights in the eyes of the state and legal system.
Nobody granted Jews special rights, they granted it to themselves by self proclaiming themselves as the 'chosen people' in ancient times.
The state of Israel now seems to have given itself special rights in that it believes it is above international law
Tell me...would 'gays' identify as a special social group if gay rights were not available to be granted?
16 April 2011, 08:13 PM
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll make no further comment
dl
dl
I will.
If a kiss (or a snog) exchange in a pub between a man and a woman is digestable (whether one likes it or not), why can't one tolerate a kiss (or even a snog) exchange between two male gay partners?? If one can't, then one is discriminating against gays IMO.
16 April 2011, 08:17 PM
#28
I think guys that have a problem with ******* are unsure of their own sexuality and have *** fantasy.
As far as i'm concerned two less blokes chasing ***** that i'm after.
who cares what they do as long as they don't try and bash my back door let them get on with it.
Besides most of them are quite good looking chaps and it just means more ***** for the hetro guys.
Go for it guys bums away.
Land rights for gay wales.
As far as i'm concerned two less blokes chasing ***** that i'm after.
who cares what they do as long as they don't try and bash my back door let them get on with it.
Besides most of them are quite good looking chaps and it just means more ***** for the hetro guys.
Go for it guys bums away.
Land rights for gay wales.
16 April 2011, 08:20 PM
#29
Scooby Regular
This guy struck me as a bit of a d*ck tbh. Listened to him on the radio yesterday and he was pretty antagonising. Have to agree with Jer, he would get thrown out on his **** up here. So glad I live where I do and not amongst these guardian reading losers.
Not so sure about gay rights... would prefer universal rights. Gay rights to me means privileges. What did this guy expect? Ok, so they should be treated equality, but there is something about two guys kissing that is still quite surprising. That's just part of the world we live in at the mo. Maybe in the future our culture will change; but where you have the vast majority of people straight, it will always make people uncomfortable. That's not discrimination, it's just a natural reaction.
I would never even 'snog' a girl in an environment like that. A bit of a kiss to show affection, yeah - tongue down throat, no.
Not so sure about gay rights... would prefer universal rights. Gay rights to me means privileges. What did this guy expect? Ok, so they should be treated equality, but there is something about two guys kissing that is still quite surprising. That's just part of the world we live in at the mo. Maybe in the future our culture will change; but where you have the vast majority of people straight, it will always make people uncomfortable. That's not discrimination, it's just a natural reaction.
I would never even 'snog' a girl in an environment like that. A bit of a kiss to show affection, yeah - tongue down throat, no.
16 April 2011, 08:36 PM
#30
Lots of ******* are exhibitionists and do stuff like that just to shock and provoke a reaction, screaming queens being a prime example.
If your a woman trapped in a mans body you would not feel the need to run around like a raving banshee pro claiming your femininity.
It's a mans interpretation of what he thinks a woman is and acts like.
I've been around more than my fair share of women and also have 5 sisters and iv'e never met a woman that acts like a screaming queen.
except the ones im giving multiple orgasms to
If your a woman trapped in a mans body you would not feel the need to run around like a raving banshee pro claiming your femininity.
It's a mans interpretation of what he thinks a woman is and acts like.
I've been around more than my fair share of women and also have 5 sisters and iv'e never met a woman that acts like a screaming queen.
except the ones im giving multiple orgasms to
Last edited by ditchmyster; 16 April 2011 at 08:38 PM.