The Dogs B******s

With his Watch Threads,all is forgiven




Its must be better than talking about all the Foreigners.

zip106

As boring as watches are, they're not as boring as NSR being filled with stories about, you know...... ethnics






(edit by web-team... Ahem)

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

If you want to talk to a gypo give your family a ring.

The Dogs B******s

But you're not my family,you Pikey ****

Turbohot

IMO Yoza was a good poster despite of his watch threads.

For me, he specifically landmarked his SN participation with his response on the thread by Jacko called something like "When we were poor..........".

I took Yoza for a good poster.

Lee247

Lee247

He was interesting when he wasn't talking about watches but he did take umbrage if you did not like his favoured subject
We can't all agree or like the same things. It would be bloody boring if we did

little-ginge

Hush your filthy mouth!!

Trout

iTrader: (1)

what would scooby do

*WARNING*

NOSTALGIA THREAD!!

Turbohot

Too touchee type, then.

Very true.


There was definitely a distinct substance to his posts that I happened to read, which I admired.

Bubba po

Please, for the sake of Mary, mother of God and all the orphans, don't bring back those tedious fecking watch threads. I've had as much as I can stand of them.

bigsinky

bit like your band threads bubba

MMT WRX

No, no more watch threads, please.

Will

Leave the fat pikey cunt were he is!!!!

MMT WRX

Crickey, can you call him that on here...















Was he really that fat then?

f1_fan

iTrader: (9)

Bubba, normally and in any sane world I would agree with you, but compared to the 'you know what' threads I am not so sure

PaulC72

i would agree there is no room for someone who threatens violence over a bloody internet forum and the comments made within.

I suppose too many steroids fuse the brain.

Bubba po

I don't recall posting any?

Jamo

iTrader: (23)

why was he banned?

hell they let pete back so surely yoza is a sure thing?

zip106

You didn't get my irony, then.

kingofturds

iTrader: (1)

I don't think Pete threatened to kill members of the forum though.

ALi-B

iTrader: (1)

Of course, that only happened because a certain known group of users hounded him.

That's no excuse for his actions, but if we permanently removed the persons who were responsible for the initial baiting, the situation may have not have escalated in the manner it did. If we noted the pattern of users involved alot sooner, maybe the outcome would have been different, who knows?

Keep pushing someone and they will react. Although call me cynical, could that have been the whole intention to ensure he did get banned?

Jamo

iTrader: (23)

Oh I obviously missed that thread..

what happened?

ALi-B

iTrader: (1)

Put it this way, it resulted in this sticky:

https://www.scoobynet.com/scoobynet-...ing-on-sn.html

Leslie

They were forgettable!

Les

Jamo

iTrader: (23)

Ouch!

PaulC72

You may or may not be right Ali, we will never know however on the fact that it did happen can be discussed :-)

Also if the other users involved should have been repremanded/banned/beaten (oops can't say that) earlier the mod team would now need to stand down as they missed the entire problem

Eitherway I don't condone anyone being like that regardless of how pushed they are, real life being a differnet matter with face to face situations but on a forum there is no need especially as he could have just ignored then using a built in function and also reported it to you guys.

I never really had much of a discussion with the guy myself.

ALi-B

iTrader: (1)

Yes requests to ignore and back away were ignored, as with the other main parties who equally ignored our requests. Because of that I personally wanted to ban all parties involved. In fact I actually said that in a reply to a thread you made during that time Paul. However that was considered to be too draconian; as some of the "hangers on" who were part of the same group that followed each other around and chipped in with their own posts would have also ended up being banned too, as at one point we had about ten users involved in this.

So maybe in hindsight we should have banned everyone involved, and doing it alot sooner (be it only temporary bans), but instead we gave everyone benefit of the doubt. In effect giving them the shovel to dig their own holes with, so each time a mod request was ignored or they made an abusive post, the deeper their hole became. In the end, some people ended up being banned anyway.

This hindsight was confirmed when we were allowed access to outside information/forums some time after the matter had been dealt with, confirming to me at least there was smoke before the fire and a few people were indeed out to stir up trouble on SN, be against the forum as a whole or just certain users, however by then it was too late. On the plus side, it does help to provide us with background information, and is useful to keep tabs on things incase anything similar happens again in the future.

DCI Gene Hunt

Oi, Robocop.... get a grip, it's the "internet" unless...