Random weird question
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Random weird question
Probably with a simple answer too, but here goes...
A few years back when the National Lottery had a massive jackpot, there was talk of a consortium coming together to cover all bases, and buy all combinations available.
Apparently the odds of the jackpot are 14,000,000 - 1
So, imagine this happens, and suprise, yes the win the jackpot....
With the other tickets remaining, how many other winning tickets would they have with 3 numbers, 4 numbers, 5 numbers, and 5= the bonus?
A few years back when the National Lottery had a massive jackpot, there was talk of a consortium coming together to cover all bases, and buy all combinations available.
Apparently the odds of the jackpot are 14,000,000 - 1
So, imagine this happens, and suprise, yes the win the jackpot....
With the other tickets remaining, how many other winning tickets would they have with 3 numbers, 4 numbers, 5 numbers, and 5= the bonus?
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bring back infractions!
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Saw a programme about some group trying to do that in the USA for one of their lotteries.
As you only have a week to enter all winning combinations the logistics of it were a nightmare. They employed people to be feeding slips into lottery machines night and day, and seem to remember they had somehow acquired half a dozen or so machines for their purposes. Even then they failed to get every single combination in before the deadline but luckily did have the winning ticket. Must have been a bit of a bottom clencher as the numbers were drawn though. Like you say they also got a lot of money from the lesser prize tickets. Think it took them ages to sort through all that too despite having a lot of computers involved in it all. Think it was a few years back though so probably a bit easier with the computing power available today.
As you only have a week to enter all winning combinations the logistics of it were a nightmare. They employed people to be feeding slips into lottery machines night and day, and seem to remember they had somehow acquired half a dozen or so machines for their purposes. Even then they failed to get every single combination in before the deadline but luckily did have the winning ticket. Must have been a bit of a bottom clencher as the numbers were drawn though. Like you say they also got a lot of money from the lesser prize tickets. Think it took them ages to sort through all that too despite having a lot of computers involved in it all. Think it was a few years back though so probably a bit easier with the computing power available today.
#3
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
besides the link is blocked at work haha. Does it actually say how many winning tickets would be generated?
#5
ok, £14m outlay, £15.5m return based on a £10m jackpot:
1x £10m
6x £195k
250x £2.5k
14000x £90
245000x £10
1x £10m
6x £195k
250x £2.5k
14000x £90
245000x £10
Last edited by SJ_Skyline; 29 September 2010 at 02:57 PM.
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excellent nice one
Hmmm what other random crap can I think of while I "work"
Cheers fella
Trout its ok, like PSL, I like to keep my money locked away safely, and would never gamble it like this
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E London
Posts: 13,654
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM